China Doesn’t Play Monroe Doctrine, ‘America’s Backyard’ on Fire?

Published in China Review News
(Hong Kong) on 10 January 2015
by Zhijun Guo (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Anthony Chantavy. Edited by Bora Mici.
"Latin America" refers to the region south of the United States, including Mexico, Central America, the West Indies and South America. Latin America has a total of 34 countries and regions. For a long time, it has also been called "America's backyard,” and America keeps a close eye on it. Latin America is the reason for America's Monroe Doctrine. The Monroe Doctrine, published in 1823, reveals the attitudes of the United States of America back then, such as those against Europe's great powers colonizing America or Europe's right to set foot in America or Mexico. Regarding disputes between European countries or wars between every country and its American colony, America remains neutral. If similar wars occured in America, America would see them as signs of hostility. The doctrine was an effective strategy that let America grow from a weak little country to a strong and supreme one; of course, there are mixed responses to this. Within the doctrine is America's ambition to control Latin America.

With this, we can understand that any country crossing paths with Latin America will attract suspicion of offending America's strategic interests. China is no exception.

The first China-Latin America and the Caribbean Forum (China-CELAC) for foreign ministers had its grand opening on Jan. 8 in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. At the ceremony, President Xi Jinping delivered a speech entitled "Jointly Writing a New Chapter of the China-CELAC Comprehensive Cooperative Partnership." Xi stated, "We should make joint efforts to achieve the goal of raising the trade volume between China and the CELAC to $500 billion and China's direct investment volume in the Latin American region to $250 billion within 10 years." It appears that comprehensive cooperation with Latin America is a goal upon which China is settled.

The China-CELAC Forum, taking place in Beijing for the first time, not only clearly showed Latin America's important place in China's diplomatic layout, but has even improved China's global partnership network and turned the world's eyes once again to China's first round of diplomacy in 2015. Of course, this artful South-South cooperation also arouses doubt.

There is some public worry that China has moved America's "cheese" in Latin America — that is, worry that China is a threat to America's interests in Latin America. There are also some foreign media claiming that China intentionally uses the forum to implement Asia-Pacific rebalancing in America's backyard, planting itself in America's geostrategic territory.

However, in reality, we believe that China means not to fight with America for interests in Latin America, but [wants] everyone to benefit.

This is because China's rapid increase in demand for Latin America's mineral resources and bulky goods will boost Latin America's economic momentum, taking some burden off America's shoulders. Moreover, President Xi Jinping has already expressed that the Chinese economy will maintain a new semi-rapid growth, providing more marketing, investment and cooperation opportunities to countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. This makes it clear that China's investment in Latin America is continual and stable, and Latin America has always profited from China. As a matter of fact, China-Latin America cooperation happens to serve as Latin America's main economic momentum, and these South-South relations will help build a more prosperous and open Latin America.

China-Latin America relations may have had a late start, but they have developed quickly. Especially in this new century, this cooperation across the Pacific Ocean constantly picks up speed, and both parties have discovered the value of each other's cooperation. Since China's policy paper on Latin America and the Caribbean was published in 2008, China and Latin America have entered the fast lane, and now China is already Latin America's second largest trade partner and third largest source of investment. In the future, they can broaden their field of cooperation through this forum. We are certain that every country will reach out to cooperate in fields such as energy resources, construction of basic facilities, agriculture, manufacturing and technological innovation.

Actually, many Chinese and foreign scholars have recently shared their perspectives on current China-Latin America relations. Dr. Wang Youming, director of the Department for Developing Countries Studies at the China Institute of International Studies, states that even though China's economic interests in Latin America increase rapidly, they have not changed America's position or overall regional structure there. America has no need to worry about "China factors" growing day by day. Jin Canrong, associate dean of the School of International Studies at Renmin University of China, adds that ever since America's Asia-Pacific rebalancing, China-Latin America relations have escalated, especially in terms of strategy; but up to now, the economy is still their strongest tie. Therefore, America is not at all on its guard. It views Latin America as a poor family member, so China sending money to help Latin America's economic independence is worthy of America's approval. As long as conflict between China and America does not stand out, there will not be so much tension.

Margaret Myers, program director of the China-Latin America Initiative of the Inter-American Dialogue, states that Latin America was never good at thinking or developing as a whole, and existing problems will not immediately end with China’s forum. She says, “If China can push Latin America’s integration forward through the forum or other diplomatic initiatives, then that’s fantastic.”* Bruno Ayllón, researcher and famous scholar from the School of International Relations at the National Institute of Advanced Studies of Ecuador, states that the increasingly intimate cooperation between Latin America and the Caribbean and China will have huge influences on the structure of the world. China and Latin America have different national conditions, so their unique advantages can combine to benefit one another and suit everyone’s interests.

From this, we can clearly see that China's interactions with "America's backyard" focus on economic interests and balance. These are completely different from America's activities in Asia, because the Asia-Pacific rebalancing strategy focuses on strategic interests and even military alliance interests. So China is not starting a fire in "America's backyard" — it is America igniting China's borders. There is no way to discuss both of these on the same day.

We also believe that the relationship between China's development and Latin America's, and that between America's development and Latin America's do not go together. The development of China-Latin America relations benefits America and other regions of the world. China has persevered on its path of peaceful development, maintaining a direction of closeness, loyalty, favor and inclusiveness. We have never practiced the Monroe Doctrine or hegemony. This diplomatic tactic works with our surrounding countries, and it works with Latin America. On Nov. 18, 2013 in Washington, John Kerry said that the Monroe Doctrine is over, and that country relations in the Americas are built on a foundation of balanced partnership and joint responsibility. Never again will the U.S. devote itself to interfering with the affairs of other countries of the Americas. This being the case, it should not turn to conspiracy theories about China's friendly interaction with Latin America.

The ghost of the Monroe Doctrine may yet linger, but it cannot resist the sun's rays. China does not pursue exclusive interests in Latin America, and it does not wish to contend with the U.S. for "backyard sovereignty" and thereby put U.S. territory at risk. Rather, we seek harmonious development, and societies across the world should know this. Followers of the Monroe Doctrine cannot simply coin a “China threat" theory and distort China's true intentions. The sky is vast, cooperative trends are becoming global and no one can obstruct us.

We also hope that China-Latin America interactions will be transparent from now on, so that the world will have more knowledge and trust. China does not play the Monroe Doctrine game — because it has no intention to control Latin America. It has not a single stick of firewood, and any criticisms that say it is playing with fire are groundless.

*Editor's note: Accurately translated, this quotation could not be verified.


中評社香港1月10日電(評論員 郭至君)中國最近與拉丁美洲打得火熱,世界輿論議論紛紛。

  拉丁美洲是指美國以南的美洲地區,包括墨西哥、中美洲、西印度群島和南美洲。拉丁美洲共有34個國家和地區。拉美長期被稱作“美國後院”,美國盯得很緊,這個地區讓美國產生了“門羅主義”。“門羅主義”(Monroe Doctrine)發表於1823年,表明美利堅合眾國當時的觀點,即歐洲列強不應再殖民美洲,或涉足美國與墨西哥等美洲國家之主權相關事務。而對於歐洲各國之間的爭端,或各國與其美洲殖民地之間的戰事,美國保持中立。相關戰事若發生於美洲,美國將視為具敵意之行為。“門羅主義”作為行之有效的戰略,有助美國從弱小國家變成強大的霸權國家,對此褒貶不一,當然,“門羅主義”本身包含美國控制拉美的野心。

  由此可知,與拉美打交道,任何國家都有冒犯美國戰略利益的嫌疑。中國更是不會成為例外。

  中國-拉美和加勒比國家共同體論壇首屆部長級會議8日在北京人民大會堂隆重開幕。中國國家主席習近平出席了開幕式並發表題為《共同譜寫中拉全面合作夥伴關係新篇章》的講話。在講話中,習近平提出:“我們要共同努力,實現10年內中拉貿易規模達到5000億美元、中國在拉美地區直接投資存量達到2500億美元的目標。”由此看來,與拉美全面合作,是中國已經認定的目標。

  中國—拉共體論壇首次在北京召開,不僅凸顯了拉美在中國外交佈局中的重要位置,還進一步完善了中國遍佈全球的夥伴關係網絡,也讓全世界的目光再次聚焦於2015年中國的首場主場外交。當然,2015年年初這場大手筆的“南南”合作,也讓一些充滿疑慮的聲音浮出水面。

  其中,有一些輿論擔心中國會動了美國在拉美的“乳酪”,把中國因素視為對美國在拉美地區利益的“威脅”;也有一些外媒炒作稱,中國有意借助“中拉論壇”在美國的“後院”實施中國版的“亞太再平衡”戰略,長久地嵌入美國的地緣戰略版圖。

  但事實上,我們認為,中國和拉共體國家的合作,不是所謂和美國爭搶在該地區的利益,而是“惠本國且利天下”的。

因為,中國對拉美礦產資源和大宗商品需求的快速增長將進一步增加拉美經濟發展的動力,同時,也有助於減輕美國幫扶拉美發展經濟的負擔和壓力。而且,國家主席習近平也已經表示,中國經濟將保持中高速增長的新常態,給拉美和加勒比等國提供更多市場機遇、增長機遇、投資機遇和合作機遇。這就表明,中國對於拉美的投資將是持續且穩定的,拉美從中國的獲利也不是一天兩天的事。實際上,中國與拉美國家的合作正好成為該地區經濟發展的主要動力,中拉“南南聯手”也有助於建立一個更加繁榮、開放的拉美。

  中國與拉美關係雖然起步較晚,但進展很快。尤其是進入新世紀以來,中拉跨越太平洋的合作更是不斷提速,雙方都發現了彼此的合作價值,2008年中國發佈了《中國對拉丁美洲和加勒比政策檔》之後,雙方的合作更加進入了快車道,目前,中國已是拉美地區第二大交易夥伴和第三大投資來源地。未來,中國和拉美國家可以合作的領域更是寬廣,通過此次論壇,相信各國將在包括能源、基礎設施建設、農業、製造業以及技術創新等等領域內展開合作。

  其實,中外多位專家學者近日來都對中拉關係的走近做出了評價。中國國際問題研究院發展中國家研究所所長王友明說,儘管中國在拉美的經濟利益迅猛增加,但並未改變美國在該地區的地位和地區總體格局。美國無需擔心日益增長的“中國因素”。中國人民大學國際關係學院副院長金燦榮也稱,美國亞太再平衡後,中拉關係升級,在戰略上有所側重。但到今天為止,仍以經濟為主導,戰略不佔主導。因此,美國並不特別戒備。美國將拉美視為自家窮親戚,中國輸出金錢,幫助其“經濟自立”,對美國有好處,也比較讚同。中美矛盾不突出,緊張有限。

  美洲國家對話組織中國和拉美專案的主管瑪格麗特•邁爾斯說,拉美國家歷來就不擅長從區域整體的角度思考和發展,已經存在的問題也不會因為中國舉辦的論壇立即結束。“如果中國通過這次論壇或其他外交倡議對該區域的一體化起到推動作用,那將是極好的。”厄瓜多爾國家高等研究院國際關係資深研究員、著名學者布魯諾•艾利翁則表示,拉共體和中國建立日益密切的合作關係必將對世界格局產生重大影響。中國和拉美國家國情不同,優勢互補,同中國發展互利互惠的夥伴關係符合各方利益。

由此,我們可以清晰地看出,中國在“美國後院”的互動活動,是以經濟利益為主,是經濟平衡。這與美國在亞洲的活動性質完全不同,美國的亞太再平衡戰略,是以戰略利益,甚至是以軍事同盟利益為主線的。所以,中國不是在美國的後院放火,而美國則是在中國的周邊點火。兩者不可同日而語。

  我們也認為,中國發展與拉美國家的關係與美國發展與拉美國家的關係並行不悖,中拉關係發展對美國和世界其他地區都有利。中國一直都堅持走和平發展道路,堅持親、誠、惠、容的周邊外交方針,從不搞“門羅主義”或是“霸權主義”。這樣的外交策略,在周邊國家行得通,在拉美地區也同樣適用。美國國務卿克里2013年11月18日在華盛頓表示,“門羅主義”的時代已經終結,今天的美洲國家間關係建立在平等夥伴關係和共同責任基礎上,美國不再致力於干預其他美洲國家事務。既然如此,對於中國與拉美的良性互動,就不要往陰謀論方面轉腦筋。

  “門羅主義”或者陰魂不散,但是畢竟無法抵擋陽光的投射。中國在拉美不追求排他性利益,更不是要與美國爭奪其“後院主權”,從而威脅美國本土,而是求和諧共發展,國際社會應對此有正確的認識。“門羅主義”的信徒們不要一味地渲染“中國威脅論”而曲解中國的本意。青冥浩蕩,全球化的合作大勢,滌蕩拉美國家,誰也阻擋不住的。

  我們也希望,中國與拉美國家的互動在今後要完全透明,讓世界多一份了解,會多一份信任。中國不玩“門羅主義”,就是不要有任何想控制拉美的戰略意圖。一根火柴都沒有,如何指責玩火都是沒有根據的。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Topics

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Related Articles

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Hong Kong: Foreign Media Warn US Brand Reputation Veering toward ‘Collapse’ under Trump Policy Impact

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony