The diplomatic rapprochement between Cuba and the United States has occurred 56 years after the breakdown of relations between the two nations, after pressure from Pope Francis and other international requests, including the intervention of the Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who is rightly concerned about the huge amount of natural gas that is being sent each month to the Caribbean island and which the Russians need to sustain their economy.
Russia maintains a dangerous confrontation in the Crimea region, which possesses the bulk of Russia’s troops, and, most importantly, the natural gas it needs.
Russia is not greatly interested in the future of Cuba, a country that is concerned about the turn its economy has taken. For this reason, Raul Castro, substitute for his brother Fidel who was in power, has changed his political and economic position in the last two years in order to provide a timid diplomatic opening to his citizens abroad, mainly in the United States. He has also opened Cuba’s borders to the import of products of the modern globalized world in which we live, which was previously forbidden.
The world is changing, and relations between nations are suffering a phenomenal change in which everyone has to do what they can to adapt to the new order.
Therefore, the Cuban regime has contributed to an approach with the Yankees — situated so close and yet so far — while Barack Obama, the U.S. president, has seen this as an attractive opportunity to do business with Cuba and to strengthen links, peace and harmony. Moreover, in this way, Vladimir Putin is getting out of his commitment to Fidel Castro by leaving the Cubans to see how they manage to survive on their own. History does not stop, but changes as time passes.
Rusia mantiene una peligrosa confrontación en la región de Crimea, donde está el grueso de sus tropas y, lo más importante, posee el gas natural que necesita.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.
The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.
Stone ... argued that Hernández’s liberation would give renewed energy to the Honduran right wing, destabilize President Castro’s government, and strengthen what he believes to be Trump and the U.S.’ interests in the region.