President Obama and Islamophobia

Published in El Punt
(Spain) on 14 February 2015
by Joan Gil (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ken Woodhouse. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
It is some time now since President Obama managed to disillusion the progressives — what the left is called in the U.S. — without whom he would never have got into power. He made fantastic speeches, positioning himself alongside the best orators that the country has known. He went to Cairo to promise a new era and new policies and the end of the unpopular Iraq war. Recently, an academic wrote in the famous Harper’s magazine that he deceived us all — even, unexpectedly, the Nobel Committee — presenting himself, before we knew him, as something he wasn’t and in fact has ended up as the most imperialist president in recent history. The very recent drama in the city in which the famous Duke University in North Carolina is situated, has made us think again that he or his advisers are avoiding or are not worried by the tragedy of the conversion to jihadism of our young Muslim citizens.

The incident began in a condo complex (privately owned flats and dwellings) in Chapel Hill, a very quiet city with universities and well known research facilities. It is a pleasant place, somewhat flat, very green and with a good climate. A very unpleasant man lived here; divorced, 50-ish, who was forever putting photos of his automatic weapon on his Facebook page and who in fact sometimes knocked, gun in hand, on the door of neighbors who annoyed him. He was poorly thought of because of his confrontations, which were threatening, complaining and demanding. Curiously no one ever complained to the police. It seemed that he was forever watching over the parking area. As the complex was private it wouldn’t have been easy to move him on.

One day, the man saw the car of some comfortably-off and working Muslim neighbors arrive with three students in it, all about 20-something, a recently married couple and the wife’s sister. He went out with his gun and a dispute quickly developed with the young people about whether the space where they had parked was for residents or reserved for visitors, a subject that was one of his obsessions. The man fired three times and the young Muslims, who of course were unarmed, were killed.

Police and the White House Don’t Take it Seriously

To the police, this was simply a parking dispute between neighbors and they decided to ignore the racist and xenophobic nature of the crime, which to everybody else seemed obvious. What would have happened if the three dead people had been black rather than Muslim of Pakistani heritage? Curiously the White House, from where there are so many speeches about coexistence and tolerance, also didn’t want to get involved. One would have to be very ignorant not to immediately see the danger. This is not only for the large number of Muslims who live in the country, but also because jihadi websites are continually repeating to their young people that Muslims are hated and badly treated in all Western countries and that the only option is to escape to save their lives and fight to the death. The case of the Abu Graib prison and civilian deaths in the Middle East caused by U.S. drone and aerial attacks are two of the main arguments used with so much success by the jihadi recruiters that live among us. Now they have another one.

Two days after the crime, once complaints and warnings had come in from all over, the White House finally began to understand. So many people turned out at the funeral of the three victims in Chapel Hill that it had to be moved to a sports field. Muslims started to demonstrate all over and suddenly a crowd gathered, in Muslim prayer, touching their heads to the ground, in Lafayette Park in front of the White House. At last the president was seen to understand and deigned to condemn in public. Too late. The jihadis have scored again. A dispute in a parking lot and nothing more?

Wars, Wars and More Wars

Mr. Obama got himself elected with the promise of ending the war in Iraq, something that he achieved very slowly and, as we are seeing now, very incompletely. He started and has never finished the war in Afghanistan that has now lasted 10 years. Yes, he tried to impose a peace treaty on Israel in Palestine, but he was made to retreat with his tail between his legs. New wars broke out in Syria, Yemen, Somalia, the Russian Caucasus, Lebanon, Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad, Niger, Mali, Algeria and Libya; there are continually more conflicts and more regimes that are shaking Arabia, and the Israelis continue to boycott any negotiations with Iran, insisting on bombing and a new war. Mr. Obama has impotently presided over all this, simply responding with force and even more violence. It cannot be denied that some things need a military response, but no one gets the impression that there could also be a convincing political response or a credible analysis of the situation made. We will continue to see wars and destruction for many years even in the West. Where are the spirit and the changes announced in Cairo? Everything seems like a ship in a storm that cannot go where it wants or decide its destination. If only the good old days of President Bush could return, when there was only one war …

The American Left and Obama

The president does few press conferences, preferring instead to travel to provincial cities and present himself at town meetings — meetings and question and answer sessions from supposedly ordinary people who don’t worry about things which are too complicated. However, journalists have managed to ask him his opinion about the growing hostility from within progressive circles about his policies, now as bad as those of the Republicans. He always answers arrogantly, like an emperor offended by discourteous subjects. But, leaving aside the completely out of control issue of jihadi wars, there are other things.

One example is the matter of the protection of privacy and the storage of phone data, which has put the two giants of industry, Google and Apple, on a war footing. Imagine their anger and surprise when a few weeks ago, after the incident with the North Korean dictator, government agents presented themselves at the headquarters of those companies, physically opened certain computers and forcibly installed their own chips, saying that they needed them to know where the attacks in defense of the dictator had come from. Both Google and Apple have responded by developing an encryption system which is impossible to penetrate and refusing to give the government the code, so long as Congress doesn’t pass a law requiring them to hand it over and this is unlikely. Obama continues to talk of Edward Snowden as a traitor and a criminal who should go to jail for spying. Every day there are more and more people who see it differently.

Another example would be the matter of the law establishing compulsory health insurance, Obama’s only legislative success. In principle, it was a notable success, but looking at the details, it doesn’t seem to be so well thought out. Those who don’t get company health insurance — like the insurance which I have had for my whole career — are obliged to buy one from a profit-driven private company. If they don’t, they have to pay a fine in the form of additional taxes. Some reasonably priced health plans are offered but there are many exclusions and above all demand enormous contributions — of $7,000 in the worst case, which is very common. There was always the option of simply admitting younger ill people to Medicare, the federal insurance for people over 65, which works quite well. Instead of this, the government offered a fabulous business opportunity with millions of new compulsory policies to private industry, which surely will do nothing to control the ever escalating prices. It would be good if the Federal Supreme Court were to end this fundamental aspect of the program very quickly.

With regard to the lack of punishment or prosecutions against the bank directors who caused the 2008 disaster and who happily continue to earn salaries of millions, don’t they need locking up like Snowden?

I always say that the politicians we have in the U.S. have never been the best. In any case less than two years remain. Will the successor be any better? Ah …


El President Obama i la Islamofòbia
Tragèdia a Chapel Hill
El President Obama ja fa temps que va aconseguir desenganyar a tots els progressius (que és com l’esquerra és anomenada als EUA), sense els quals no hauria arribat mai al poder. Feia discursos fantàstics, posant-se al nivell dels millors oradors que aquest país ha conegut, va anar al Cairo a prometre una era i una política noves i la fi de la guerra impopular de l’Iraq. Un acadèmic va escriure recentment a la famosa revista Harper que ens va enredar a tots (fins i tot inesperadament al Comitè Nobel) presentant-se, abans que el coneguéssim, com una cosa que ell no era i que de fet ha resultat el President més imperialista de la història dels darrers temps. El drama tan recent a la ciutat on està situada la famosa Duke University a Carolina del Nord, ens ha tornat a fer pensar que o ell o els seus consellers o no toquen o no es preocupen per la tragèdia de la conversió al Gihadisme dels nostres ciutadans joves musulmans.
L’incident va començar a una urbanització de condominis (pisos i habitatges de propietat individual) a Chapel Hill, una ciutat molt tranquil•la amb universitats i instituts de recerca famosos. És un lloc agradable, més aviat pla i molt verd amb bon clima. Al lloc vivia un home desagradable, divorciat, de cinquanta-tants anys, que sempre publicava al seu Facebook fotos del fusell automàtic del que era propietari i de fet a vegades trucava a la porta de veïns que l’havien molestat amb el fusell a la mà. Era molt mal vist perquè confrontava als residents amb amenaces, queixes i ordres. Curiosament, ningú es va queixar mai a la policia. Sobretot semblava vigilar molt l’aparcament. Com que els habitatges són de propietat, no hauria estat fàcil treure’l fora.
L’home va veure arribar un mal dia el cotxe d’uns veïns musulmans acomodats i amb carreres, ocupat per tres joves estudiants, tots d’uns vint anys, que eren un matrimoni recentment casat i una germana de la dona. Va sortir amb el seu fusell i aviat es va desenvolupar una disputa amb els joves sobre si el lloc on havien aparcat era per residents o reservat per visitants, un tema que era una de les seves obsessions. L’home va disparar el seu fusell tres vegades i els tres joves musulmans, que naturalment anaven desarmats, van caure abatuts.
La Policia i la Casa Blanca no s’ho prenen seriosament
Per a la policia es tractava simplement d’una disputa entre veïns per un aparcament de cotxes, i van decidir ignorar el caràcter racista i xenofòbic del crim, que a tothom li semblava transparent. I si els tres morts haguessin estats negres enlloc de ser musulmans d’arrels al Pakistan? Curiosament la Casa Blanca, que fa tants sermons sobre la convivència i la tolerància tampoc s’hi volia ficar. Cal ser molt ignorant per no veure immediatament el perill, no sols pel gran nombre de musulmans que viuen al país, sinó també perquè els webs gihadistes a l’internet contínuament repeteixen al seu jovent que els musulmans són odiats i maltractats a tots els països occidentals i que no hi ha més remei que escapar per salvar la vida i lluitar a mort. El cas de la presó d’Abu Graib i les morts de civils al Mig Orient pels drons i atacs aeris dels EUA són dos dels arguments principals usats amb tant èxit pels reclutadors gihadistes que viuen entre nosaltres. Ara ja en tenen un altre.
Als dos dies del crim,i quan ja arribaven les queixes i els avisos de tot arreu, finalment a la Casa Blanca ho van entendre. Al funeral de les tres víctimes a Chapel Hill es va presentar tanta gent, que van haver de traslladar-ho a un camp de futbol. Musulmans van començar a manifestar-se a tot arreu i de sobte una multitud es va presentar fent una sessió de precs musulmans tocant el sòl amb el cap al Parc Lafayette davant de la Casa Blanca. Ara es veu que al final sí que el President ho ha entès i s’ha dignat fer una condemnació pública. Massa tard. Els gihadistes han tornat a marcar. Una disputa a un parking i si no, res?
Guerres, guerres i més guerres
El Sr Obama es va fer elegir amb la promesa d’acabar amb la guerra d’Iraq, cosa que va aconseguir molt poc a poc i tal com veiem ara, molt incompletament. Va encetar i no ha acabat mai la guerra d’Afganistan, que ja dura uns deu anys. A Palestina sí que va intentar imposar a Israel un tractat de pau, però el van fer recular amb la cua entre les cames. Noves guerres van esclatar a Síria, al Iemen, a Somàlia, al Caucas rús, al Líban, a Nigèria, a Cameroon, a Chad a Niger, a Mali, a Algèria, a Líbia, cada dia hi ha més conflictes i més règims que trontollen a Aràbia, i els israelians segueixen boicotejant qualsevol negociació am Iran, insistint en un bombardeig i una nova guerra. El Sr Obama ha presidit sobre tot això de forma molt impotent, simplement responent amb força i encara més violència. No es pot negar que certes coses necessitaven una resposta militar, però ningú viu sota la impressió que hi hagi també una resposta política contundent ni un anàlisi digne de crèdit de la situació. Seguirem veient guerres i destrucció fins i tot a l’Occident per molts anys. I l’esperit i els canvis anunciats al Cairo, on són? Tot sembla com un vaixell al mig d’una tempesta, que no pot anar on vol ni fixar la seva destinació. Si els temps feliços del President Bush poguessin tornar, quan nomes hi havia una sola guerra…
L’esquerra americana i Obama
El President no fa gaires conferències de premsa, preferint en canvi viatjar a ciutats provincials i presentar- se a”town meetings” (reunions i respostes a preguntes de gent suposadament comú, que no es preocupen d’assumptes massa complicats). No obstant, els periodistes han aconseguit preguntar-li la seva opinió sobre la hostilitat creixent dels cercles progressius a la seva política, ja tan dolenta com la dels Republicans. Ell contesta sempre de forma molt arrogant, com un emperador ofès per súbdits desvergonyits. Però, deixant de banda la qüestió completament descontrolada de les guerres gihadistes, hi ha altres coses:
Un exemple és la qüestió de la protecció de la intimitat i el magatzematge de trucades telefòniques, que ha posat els dos gegants de la indústria, Google i Apple, en peu de guerra. Imagineu-vos la seva ràbia i sorpresa quan fa unes setmanes, després de l’incident amb el Dictador Nord-Koreà, agents del govern es van presentar a la seu d’aquestes companyies a obrir físicament certs ordenadors i ficar-hi per força “chips” propis dient que els necessitaven per saber d’on havien vingut els atacs en defensa del Dictador. Tant Google com Apple han respost desenvolupant un sistema d’encriptació impossible de penetrar i negant la clau al govern sempre que el Congrés no faci una llei exigint-lo, cosa molt poc probable. I Obama segueix parlant d’Edward Snowden com un traïdor i un delinqüent que hauria d’anar a la presó per espionatge. Cada dia hi ha més gent que ho veu de forma diferent.
Un altre exemple seria l’assumpte de la llei establint l’assegurança obligatòria de malaltia, l’únic èxit legislatiu d’Obama. En principi, fou un succés notable però mirant els detalls, no sembla gens ben feta. Els qui no reben una assegurança de malaltia de l’empresa (com la que jo vaig tenir sempre durant tota la carrera) tenen l’obligació de comprar-ne una sempre d’una companyia privada, que només vol guanyar diners. Si no ho fan han de pagar una multa en forma d impostos addicionals. Ofereixen alguns plans a bon preu que exclouen moltes coses i sobre tot exigeixen co-pagaments enormes, de $7,000 en el pitjor cas (molt freqüent) Hi havia sempre l’alternativa de simplement admetre malalts més joves a Medicare, l’assegurança federal per als ancians de més de 65 anys, que funciona força bé. Enlloc d’això, el govern va oferir un negoci fabulós de milions de pòlisses noves obligatòries a una indústria privada, que segur que no farà res per controlar els preus cada dia més astronòmics. Podria ser molt be que el Tribunal Federal Suprem acabes amb un aspecte fonamental del programa ben aviat.
I l’assumpte de la falta de càstig o processaments contra els directors de bancs que van causar el desastre de 2008 i segueixen guanyant feliçment molts milions de sou? No són com l’Snowden, que cal empresonar.
Jo sempre dic que els polítics no han estat mai el millor que tenim als EUA. En qualsevol cas, ja queden menys de dos anys? Serà millor el successor? Ai, ai…
Joan Gil

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Topics

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Related Articles

Turkey: Pay Up or Step Aside: Tariffs in America’s ‘Protection Money’ Diplomacy

Guyana: Guyana’s Ongoing Subservience to the US, Jagdeo’s Really

Brazil: Trump’s Tariffs Anger the World – But Betting against America’s A.I. Juggernaut Risks Economic Oblivion

Palestine: Axis under Siege? The US-Israeli Plan To Isolate Iran before the Next War

India: Trump vs Judiciary: Will US Power Balance Shift?