Will Iran Once Again ‘Throw In’ with the US?

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 16 July 2015
by Hua Liming (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nathan Hsu. Edited by Ashley Pinamonti .
An eleventh hour agreement reached in the Iranian nuclear negotiations has opened a door to relations between Iran and the West. The sanctions that Iran has been subject to for the past nine years due to the nuclear issue will be lifted, and well over $100 billion dollars in frozen funds are set to be released. European enterprises that have been waiting for this moment will flock to Tehran to scuffle over this long forbidden piece of fruit, and one can be sure that U.S. transnational firms will not be far behind.

Although Iran has outlasted the sanctions, a dearth of hard currency has left its economy emaciated and hungrily eyeing Western capital and technology. Iran is a traditional market for the West, and Western industrial standards and technology command high respect among many Iranian businesses and technocrats. There is little doubt that the hundred-plus Chinese enterprises and export companies that have invested in and operate in Iran will face stiff competition in the days to come.

Faced with another historic opportunity, will Iran put China in its rear view mirror and steer the Islamic Republic in the direction of the United States and the West? The answer to that question in the minds of most analysts, including those in the West, will likely be no.

The Islamic administration that currently holds power in Iran came to that position 36 years ago with the toppling of the U.S.-leaning Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, and adopting the motto "neither East nor West," sought to build an independent regional power that would uphold the honor of the Persian people. For this, Iran stood in opposition to the United States and paid a heavy price in sanctions from the West. Even in the recently concluded talks, one could see that behind the smiles of Iran's representatives lay a determination to protect the honor and interests of their people.

It is only a matter of time before the Iranian economy is integrated into the globalized system, and while an influx of Western influence will follow the flow of capital and technology into Iran, the sitting Iranian administration's policy to maintain its independence and autonomy in foreign affairs, free from the constraints of reliance upon any power, will not change. Politically, it is in this resolve that China and Iran share the most.

Although the two nations' societies and values are entirely separate, they have each chosen a path of development and model of political authority that they believe to be suitable for the conditions within their respective countries. China's socialist system and Iran's Islamic republic are not fully embraced by Western mainstream society, but China and Iran respect and do not interfere with the decisions of the other. Thus, the political foundation of China's relationship with Iran is entirely secure.

The end of the nuclear talks will quickly warm relations between Europe and Iran, but there is still a long way to go in the improvement and normalization of U.S.-Iran relations, which at least in the short term will not reach the same levels as the United States' relationships with Cuba, Myanmar or Vietnam.

After 36 years of enmity, grudges and a growing mountain of problems, the nuclear issue is only the tip of the iceberg. Iran fears that the United States is still plotting to overthrow its Islamic government, while the United States harbors suspicions that Iran will look to put a feather in its cap and then edge its benefactors out of the Middle East. The Vienna agreement has limited Iran's capability to manufacture nuclear weapons, but the United States still wishes to restrict Iran's capacity to produce missile delivery vehicles. Much to the chagrin of the United States, Iran continues to support Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Palestinian organization Hamas, while similar support for Bashar Assad's regime in Syria and Houthi forces in Yemen has long been a bone of contention between the United States and Iran. Clearly, what Iran desires is first and foremost to rid itself of sanctions, not necessarily the normalization of relations with the United States.

Iran sits at the confluence of the Caspian Sea and Persian Gulf, two regions rich in petroleum and gas, and is both a passageway for Central Asian nations to access the Indian Ocean and a bridge connecting East and West Asia. The first order of business in developing Iran's economy will be to build infrastructure and industrialize the manufacturing sector, the two areas that just so happen to be China's strong suit. In receiving the West, therefore, the doorway to Iran will be swung open even wider for China.

The author is a former Chinese ambassador to Iran.


  伊朗核谈判达成最终协议为伊朗与西方国家的关系打开了一扇门。伊朗为核问题被制裁九年,冻结的上千亿美元的资金将得以释放。等待多时的欧洲企业家们即将蜂拥而至德黑兰,争抢这块久违了的蛋糕,美国的跨国公司大概也不会落后。
  伊朗虽然挺过了制裁,但硬通货的匮乏毕竟已使伊朗经济嗷嗷待哺,急盼西方的资金和技术。伊朗是西方的传统市场,许多企业和技术官僚对西方的工业水准和技术是顶礼膜拜的。毫无疑问,百余家在伊朗投资经营的中国企业和出口商品的中国公司将遭遇剧烈的竞争。
  面对又一次历史机遇,伊朗会将“伊斯兰共和国”的方向盘转向美国和西方,同时弃中国而去吗?我想包括美国和西方在内多数分析家对这个问题的回答是否定的。
  现在伊朗执政的伊斯兰政权是36年前推翻亲美的巴列维国王上台的,他们的口号是“不要东方,不要西方”,理想是建立一个独立的、有波斯民族尊严 的地区大国。为此伊朗付出了与美国对抗被西方制裁的沉重代价。在此次核谈判中,人们看到伊朗谈判代表微笑背后保卫自己民族尊严和利益的坚定立场。伊朗的经 济迟早会融入全球化体系,西方的影响也会随着资金和技术大举进入伊朗,但是,伊朗现政权维护自己独立自主外交,不依附于任何大国的国策不会改变。这恰恰是 中国和伊朗在政治上的最大公约数。
  中国与伊朗的社会制度与价值观念绝然不同,但是两国都选择了各自认为适合自己国情的发展道路和政权模式。中国的社会主义制度和伊朗的伊斯兰共和制都不被西方主流社会完全认同,但是中伊相互尊重各自的选择,互不干涉。中伊关系的政治基础十分牢固。
  核谈判之后,伊朗与欧洲的关系预计会快速上升,而伊美关系的改善与正常化还有很长的路要走,至少在短期内达不到美古、美缅或美越关系的水平。
  美伊敌对36年,恩怨情仇,问题堆积如山,核问题只是冰山一角。伊朗疑惧美国图谋推翻伊斯兰政权,美国怀疑伊朗羽毛丰满后要将美逐出中东。维也纳核协议限制了伊朗制造核武器的能力,但是美国还要限制伊朗生产运载工具导弹的能力;伊朗支持的黎巴嫩真主党和巴勒斯坦的哈马斯是美国的心腹之患;伊朗对叙利亚巴沙尔政府和也门胡塞武装的支持都是美伊之间长期博弈的焦点。显然,伊朗要的是解除制裁,而不急于对美关系正常化。
  伊朗处于里海和波斯湾这两个世界上油气资源富集区的交汇点,它是中亚国家通向印度洋的通道,也是连接东亚和西亚的桥梁。伊朗发展经济的第一要务是基础设施建设和工业化制造业的发展,这两个领域正是中国的强项。伊朗在迎接西方的同时会将对中国的大门打得更开。(作者是中国前驻伊朗大使)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Topics

Canada: The Walls Are Closing in on Donald Trump’s Ramblings

   

Austria: Trump’s Film Tariffs Hurt Hollywood

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Related Articles

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China