Obama’s New Steeliness

Published in Frankfurter Rundschau
(Germany) on 12 September 2015
by Daniel Haufler (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
President Obama originally wanted to heal the political divide in the United States, but he has since given up trying to win the Republicans over to any of his proposals. Instead, he has become resolutely uncompromising in his dealings with them.

The Republicans may have taken control of both houses of Congress during Obama's presidency, but they have failed to advance their own agenda, regardless of what it might be. In the ongoing budget battle and the debt ceiling question, they remain as unsuccessful as they were in trying to roll back Obama's health care reforms or preventing him from concluding a nuclear agreement with Iran.

Never has an opposition party come off so pitifully — and never has a president been so successful in putting such far-reaching legislation through with the help of only the senators and representatives of his own party.

His Steeliness Increases Democrats' Chances

If Obama wanted to overcome the political divisions in the United States during his first term, he has long since reconciled himself to no longer even trying to win Republicans over to any of his agenda. He deals uncompromisingly, whether on the issue of immigration, the minimum wage, re-establishing diplomatic ties with Cuba, or concluding nuclear agreements with Iran.

That will result in the acceleration of many of his initiatives and will please the Democratic Party — something the Democratic candidates in waiting will benefit from as a welcome side effect. It raises the chances for Democrats to remain in control of the White House after 2016. And for that, they mainly have the Republicans to thank.


Die neue Härte von Obama
Von DANIEL HAUFLER


Präsident Obama wollte ursprünglich mal die politische Spaltung in den USA überwinden. Doch inzwischen versucht er gar nicht mehr, die Republikaner zu überzeugen, sondern agiert kompromisslos.


Die Republikaner haben während der Amtszeit von US-Präsident Barack Obama zwar in beiden Kammern des Kongresses die Mehrheit gewonnen. Doch sie scheitern mit fast jedem ihrer Vorhaben. Im Dauerstreit um den Haushalt und die Schuldenobergrenze stehen sie am Ende genauso erfolglos da wie bei den Versuchen, die Gesundheitsreform rückgängig zu machen oder, nun, das Atom-Abkommen mit dem Iran zu verhindern.

Noch nie wirkte eine Opposition in den USA so kümmerlich – und noch nie war ein Präsident so darauf angewiesen, allein mit den Senatoren und Abgeordneten seiner Partei weitreichende Entscheidungen durchzusetzen.

Härte erhöht Chancen der Demokraten

Wollte Obama in seiner ersten Amtszeit noch die politische Spaltung des Landes überwinden, hat er sich längst mit ihr abgefunden und versucht gar nicht mehr, Republikaner zu überzeugen. Er agiert kompromisslos, sei es bei der Einwanderungspolitik oder der Erhöhung des Mindestlohns, sei es bei den diplomatischen Beziehungen zu Kuba oder dem Atom-Deal.

Das beschleunigt viele Projekte und gefällt der Basis der Demokratischen Partei – was für deren Präsidentschaftskandidaten in spe eine erfreuliche Begleiterscheinung von Obamas neuer Härte ist. Sie erhöht die Chancen, dass die Demokraten bei den Wahlen 2016 erneut das Weiße Haus erobern. Und dafür müssten sie den Republikanern echt dankbar sein.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Paraguay: Believing What You’re Told without Knowing If It’s True: The Dangers of Disinformation

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Topics

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Thailand: Southeast Asia Amid the US-China Rift

Japan: Trump Administration: Absurd Censorship

Related Articles

Germany: Donald Trump vs. James Comey: A Legal Vendetta

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

United Kingdom: The Democrats Are in Deep Trouble in the US – and Labor Is on the Way to Joining Them

Pakistan: The Heir Apparent

Germany: Unfortunately, Reality Comes to Those Who Wait