Some Warmth in Washington

Published in La Tribune de Genève
(Switzerland) on 9 November 2015
by Jean-Cosme Delaloye (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Katie Gibson. Edited by Rachel Pott.
Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu were as warm as they could be with each other yesterday in Washington. The American president and the Israeli prime minister were looking for even the smallest of common denominators after months of tension over the nuclear agreement with Iran and the situation in the Middle East.

Last week, the White House recognized it no longer has any great hopes for peace in the Middle East between now and the end of Barack Obama's term in January 2017. As for Benjamin Netanyahu, he has had to swallow a bitter pill with the Iranian nuclear agreement. But unlike his last visit to Washington in March, when he severely criticized the Obama administration's policy on Tehran, the Israeli prime minister came with the intention of strengthening ties with the White House. In particular, he was aiming to get $50 billion worth of American military aid over 10 years.

It's in Barack Obama's interest to nurture his relationship with Benjamin Netanyahu, despite their profound ideological differences. The Democrats are hoping to keep the White House and win back a majority at the Senate in November 2016. However, in the presidential campaign, tensions with Israel are a formidable weapon for Republicans, who have relentlessly criticized Barack Obama's foreign policy to weaken Hillary Clinton and erase memories of George W. Bush's responsibility for the chaos in Iraq.

The Jewish American electorate will play a particularly important role in Florida, one of the key states on the road to the White House. In light of this, Barack Obama is preparing the way for Hillary Clinton. His former secretary of state, moreover, is distancing herself from him on the issue, and last week promised a little more warmth toward Israel if she is elected to the presidency.


Barack Obama et Benjamin Netanyahou ont été aussi chaleureux qu’ils pouvaient l’être hier à Washington. Le président américain et le premier ministre israélien ont cherché le plus petit dénominateur commun après des mois de tensions à propos de l’accord nucléaire avec l’Iran et de la situation au Proche-Orient.

La Maison-Blanche a reconnu la semaine dernière ne plus avoir de grands espoirs de paix au Proche-Orient d’ici à la fin de mandat de Barack Obama en janvier 2017. Quant à Benjamin Netanyahou, il a dû avaler l’amère pilule de l’accord nucléaire avec l’Iran. Mais contrairement à sa dernière visite à Washington en mars, où il avait sévèrement critiqué la politique de l’administration Obama vis-à-vis de Téhéran, le premier ministre israélien est arrivé avec l’intention de resserrer les liens avec la Maison-Blanche. Son but est notamment d’obtenir une aide militaire américaine de 50 milliards de dollars sur dix ans.

Barack Obama a aussi intérêt à soigner sa cohabitation avec Benjamin Netanyahou, malgré leurs profondes divergences idéologiques. Les démocrates espèrent conserver la Maison-Blanche et récupérer la majorité aux Sénat en novembre 2016. Or, les tensions avec Israël sont une arme de campagne redoutable pour des républicains qui ne cessent de critiquer la politique étrangère de Barack Obama pour affaiblir Hillary Clinton et faire oublier la responsabilité de George W. Bush dans le chaos irakien.

L’électorat juif américain jouera notamment un rôle important en Floride, l’un des Etats incontournables sur la route de la Maison-Blanche. Dans ce contexte, Barack Obama prépare le terrain pour Hillary Clinton. Son ancienne secrétaire d’Etat s’est d’ailleurs distancée de lui dans ce dossier et a promis la semaine dernière un peu plus de chaleur vis-à-vis d’Israël si elle est élue à la présidence. (TDG)

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Topics

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Related Articles

Israel: Israel Sets Its Sights on Trump, and the Iranian Nuclear Facility Is Not the Only Reason

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail

Australia: The US’s Biggest Export? Trump’s MAGA Mindset