America Says China Has Recently Deployed Guided Missiles on Yongxing Island (Woody Island), Bureau of Foreign Affairs Responds

Published in Global Times
(China) on 19 February 2016
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Calvin Blackburn. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
Question: According to reports, on Feb. 18 U.S. State Department spokesman John Kirby said that pictures from a commercial satellite clearly showed that guided missiles had been deployed on Yongxing Island, demonstrating that China has not ceased militarization. Similarly, he claimed that China has not adopted any measures to stabilize the situation. What is China’s response to this question?

Answer: China’s sovereignty over the Nansha Islands (Spratly Islands) and its surrounding area are supported by history and international law. China’s declaration that it has no intention of engaging in the “militarization” of the Nansha Islands is entirely serious and earnest. But things are just as the head of the Bureau of Foreign Affairs, Wang Yi, said yesterday. Non-militarization is not to be done by only one country, we must not apply double or multiple standards. This process will require the hard work and cooperation of countries in the region as well as related countries from outside the area.

However, the present circumstances are as follows. America continues to strengthen its forces in the South China Sea, frequently dispatching military ships and aircraft into the South China Sea region. These forces conduct high frequency missions toward China that are very similar to military reconnaissance. They have also on multiple occasions dispatched guided missile destroyers and bombers that have encroached on and at times even entered into the adjacent sea and airspace of China’s Nansha Islands. America has time and again enticed and pressured its allies or partners into highly targeted “Joint Military Exercises” and “Joint Patrols.” These activities have aggravated the tense situation in the South China Sea, and it is only as a result of them that China has engaged in the “militarization” of the South China Sea.

Yongxing Island is the inseparable territory of China. In 1959, the Chinese government established an administrative body on Yongxing Island and afterward its governmental facilities. Over the years, China has constantly been developing and constructing the necessary defense forces for the island. The countries and people with an interest in this matter ought to first educate themselves about the basic points and fundamental facts of the South China Sea’s history before they make any statements.

Question: On Feb. 18 President Barack Obama signed a new bill imposing sanctions on North Korea which included freezing involvement in North Korea’s nuclear program and provides funding to human rights abuse monitoring personnel. Does China have any comment on this?

Answer: I have paid attention to the relevant news. Currently, the situation on the Korean Peninsula is both complex and sensitive. The parties involved ought to continue to exercise self-restraint and cool-headedness, as well as persist in inter-party talks to resolve the direction of this issue.

China believes that no matter which hot button issue it is, no one can achieve fundamental resolution through pressure and sanctions alone. Any action that harms a third party’s legitimate interests will not help resolve the issue, and will only serve to make the situation even more complicated. We urge the related parties to exercise caution and prudence, as there is no need to create artificial trouble.

Question: In response to China’s deployment of guided missiles onto Yongxing Island, Australia and New Zealand have both requested that China exercise restraint on the issue of the South China Sea. What is your response to this?

Answer: The islands in the South China Sea have been the inseparable territory of China since ancient times. China has the authority to protect its rights and interests in accordance with the law. If China deploys the proper and necessary national territorial defensive installations on its own soil, this is exercising the rights endowed by international law for sovereign nations to practice self-defense and self-preservation. This is not engaging in “militarization.”

Australia and New Zealand are not among the countries involved in the South China Sea issue. I hope that the two nations can look objectively at the South China Sea issue’s history and not disregard the facts, and refrain from putting forward nonconstructive opinions.


美方称中国最近在南海永兴岛部导弹 外交部回应

问:据报道,美国务院发言人柯比 18日 称,商业卫星图片显示永兴岛导弹是最近部署的,看不到中方停止了军事化迹象,中方也没有采取任何措施使局势更稳定、更安全。中方对此有何回应?

答:中国对南沙群岛及其附近海域的主权拥有充分历史和法理依据。中国在南沙群岛无意搞“军事化”的表态是认真、严肃的。但正如日前王毅外长所说,非军事化不是一个国家的事情,也不能实施双重或多重标准,需要域内及有关域外国家一道作出努力。

然而目前的情况是,美国不断加强在南海军力部署,频繁派出军用舰机进入南海海域,对中国进行高频度抵近军事侦察,并多次派出导弹驱逐舰和战略轰炸机逼近甚至深入中国南沙群岛有关岛礁邻近海空域,一再诱压盟国或伙伴在南海搞针对性极强的“联合军演”和“联合巡航”。上述行动加剧了南海紧张局势,才是在南海搞“军事化”。

永兴岛是中国固有领土。1959年,中国政府即在永兴岛设立了办事机构及之后的政府设施,几十年来一直在其上开展建设及必要布防。有关国家和人士在表态前应先把南海的历史经纬和基本事实弄清楚。

问:美国总统奥巴马18日签署了新的对朝制裁法案,制裁措施包括冻结参与朝鲜核项目、违反人权记录的人员资产。中方对此有何评论?

答:我注意到有关报道。当前朝鲜半岛形势复杂敏感,有关各方应保持冷静克制,坚持对话协商解决问题的大方向。

中方认为,任何一个热点问题都不可能仅仅通过施压或制裁得到根本解决。任何有损第三方正当利益的行为都无助于问题的解决,只会使局势更加复杂。我们敦促有关方面慎重行事,不要人为制造麻烦。

问:针对中国在永兴岛部署导弹,澳大利亚、新西兰方面要求中方在南海问题上保持克制。你对此有何回应?

答:南海诸岛自古以来就是中国的固有领土,中国有权维护自身合法权益。中方在本国领土上部署适当、必要的国土防卫设施,是行使国际法赋予主权国家的自卫权和自保权,不是搞“军事化”。

澳大利亚和新西兰不是南海问题的当事国。希望两国客观看待南海问题的历史经纬,不要罔顾事实,也不要提出一些不具建设性的意见。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

India: What if Trump Has Just Started Another ‘Forever War’?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Topics

India: What if Trump Has Just Started Another ‘Forever War’?

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Related Articles

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Previous article
Next article