A Hard Sell of American Values Won’t Aid in the Fight Against Terrorism

Published in Wen Wei Po
(Hong Kong) on 4 May 2016
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nathan Hsu. Edited by Graeme Stewart-Wilson.
Five years have now passed since the U.S. military eliminated Osama bin Laden. But despite that notch on their proverbial belt, U.S. President Barack Obama indicated during an interview that the terrorist threat is far from past. Speaking in part to his successor, the president emphasized the importance of staying true to American values. Referring to how bin Laden was tracked down, the president added that as long as the United States remains confident, it can overcome any obstacle. Washington has widely promoted American values around the world and taken them to be universal values, holding them up as a metric to separate friends from enemies. The result has been political instability in many regions around the globe, recurring wars and conflicts, the rampant expansion of terrorist groups, and a slew of terror incidents. These facts show that the export of American values cannot bring the world peace, security, prosperity or civilization, and moreover is of no aid in the fight against terrorism.

Bin Laden's masterminding of the 9/11 attacks left not only Americans, but all people around the world shocked and dismayed, while the U.S. government saw the incident as a bitter humiliation. Rallying other nations around the world to its banner, the United States spent a full decade pursuing the perpetrators of the attack across the globe. The manhunt culminated in an operation that sent military units into Pakistan to kill bin Laden without first informing Pakistani authorities or gaining their consent, showing little consideration for diplomatic decorum. Having governed for eight years, and with the last months of his tenure now sinking below the horizon, Obama has earned few political achievements to put to his name, with the U.S. economy still lethargic and health care reforms hobbled by bureaucracy. At the time of bin Laden's death five years ago, Obama's approval ratings were at their peak. By recollecting that event at this juncture and again emphasizing its strategic and symbolic significance for the United States, Obama hopes to bolster his support among the public and remind Americans of his and the Democratic Party's contributions to the fight against terrorism, and by doing so perhaps garner more votes for the Democratic candidate in this year's general election.

Obama believes that adherence to American values can not only defeat the world's most prominent terrorists, but that it can also be a salve for other chronic ills that plague the planet. But what exactly are those American values? Simply speaking, they are the separation of powers and a political system with competitive elections, placing the social values of democracy, human rights and freedom above all else, and a set of religious beliefs rooted in the Christian tradition. The United States views this as a superior system of values — values that should be spread over the globe for all of humanity to adopt. For nearly half a century, the United States has used every means at its disposal to promote these values to various regions, but the resulting color revolutions over the past few decades have spelled only war and chaos for the Middle East, Eastern Europe and North Africa. American values have not brought democracy and civilization to those countries that have embraced them, but rather have only overturned the effective systems originally in place and created ripe breeding grounds for terrorism.

Bin Laden was the product of U.S. efforts during the Cold War to export American values to Afghanistan in opposition to the former Soviet Union, and his turning against the United States was a catastrophe of Washington's own making. The lingering effects have fueled civil wars in Iraq and Syria, given rise to the Islamic State group, a terrorist organization that has proven even more brutal and bloodthirsty than al-Qaida, and led to abhorrent terrorist attacks such as the Paris massacre and the airport bombing in Brussels. Millions of refugees have been displaced from their homes, a host of complex political, economic and religious issues have now surfaced, and at their center terrorists and their operations have become the single greatest threat to global security.

Judging friend from foe by their values has clouded the United States' vision and left them in a precarious position where the more mightily it struggles, the greater the terrorist threat it is fighting becomes. If U.S. leaders fail to recognize this and persist in forcing American values on other countries, worse yet is sure to befall the world, and the United States is no exception.


美軍擊殺拉登已經5周年。美國總統奧巴馬接受訪問時表示,即使殺死拉登,恐怖主義的威脅仍然存 在。奧巴馬寄語其接班人要堅守美國價值,並以捉拿拉登為例,認為只要保持信心,便可迎難而上。美國在全世界強推美國價值,甚至把美國價值當作普世價值,並 以此劃分敵友,結果導致全球各地政局動盪,戰亂迭起,恐怖組織氾濫猖獗,恐怖活動層出不窮。事實已經證明,輸出美國價值並不能給世界帶來和平、安全、富 庶、文明,對反恐亦於事無補。

拉登策動「9.11」恐襲,全球和美國民眾震驚不安,美國政府視為奇恥大辱,舉全國之力,花了整整 10年時間全球追兇,最終不惜破壞外交原則,在沒有知會巴基斯坦當局、更沒有取得許可的情況下,動用軍力越境誅殺拉登。奧巴馬執政8年,卸任在即,拿得出 手的政績乏善可陳,美國經濟復甦緩慢,醫療改革舉步維艱。5年前美軍擊殺拉登之時,奧巴馬的民望曾攀至頂點,如今舊事重提,重新強調誅殺拉登對於美國的戰 略和象徵意義,奧巴馬希望藉此再博得美國民眾的掌聲,重溫自己及民主黨反恐的豐功偉績,也為今年大選的民主黨候選人拉票。

奧巴馬認為堅守美國價值,不僅可以打敗全球頭號恐怖分子,而且其他難題也能迎刃而解。何為美國價值? 簡單而言,就是三權分立、選舉競爭的政治制度,再加上民主、人權、自由至上的社會價值觀,以及以基督教為本的宗教信仰。美國自視美國價值是最優越的價值 觀,應作為人類的共同價值向全球推而廣之。近半個世紀以來,美國在世界不同地區以各種手段推銷美國價值,引發一連串的顏色革命,結果造成過去數十年的中 東、東歐、北非的戰亂。美國價值沒有給接受國帶來民主文明,反而摧毀原有行之有效的制度,製造了一個又一個滋生恐怖主義的溫床。

拉登正是冷戰時期美國在阿富汗輸出美國價值抗衡前蘇聯的產物。拉登反咬美國一口,是美國自己養虎為 患。同時,因為美國價值作祟,伊拉克、敘利亞內戰不止,催生比拉登更血腥兇殘的「伊斯蘭國」,導致血洗巴黎、布魯塞爾機場爆炸等震驚全球的恐襲事件,更催 生數以百萬計的難民,為世界帶來複雜的政治、經濟及宗教問題,而當中潛伏的恐怖分子、恐怖活動更成為世界安全的首要威脅。

以價值觀來判斷敵友,讓美國陷於敵我難分的困局,陷於反恐越反越恐的惡性循環。美國再不反思自省,繼續執迷不悟將美國價值強加別國身上,必然會進一步禍害全球,也禍害美國自己。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

India: What if Trump Has Just Started Another ‘Forever War’?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Topics

Canada: Trump Did What Had To Be Done

Japan: Reckless Government Usage of Military To Suppress Protests

Mexico: The Military, Migrants and More

Australia: NATO Aims To Flatter, but Trump Remains Unpredictable

Germany: Can Donald Trump Be Convinced To Remain Engaged in Europe?

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Iran and Israel: a Fragile Ceasefire

India: US, Israel and the Age of Moral Paralysis

Related Articles

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Hong Kong: Foreign Media Warn US Brand Reputation Veering toward ‘Collapse’ under Trump Policy Impact

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony