Obama Says Farewell to the UN with a Defense of His Legacy and an Attack on Populism

Published in Publico
(Portugal) on 20 September 2016
by Rita Siza (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jane Dorwart. Edited by Sarah Hamilton .
In his final speech before the General Assembly of the United Nations, U.S. President Barack Obama defended his foreign policy legacy and his approach in responding to the great international crises, characterized, as he explained, by a deep belief in the functioning of diplomacy, in cooperation between countries and in multilateralism. It is an approach which both explains the great successes of his administration — the historic international agreement for the supervising of the Iran nuclear program and the normalization of relations with Cuba, for example — as well as his major failures, the paralyzed Israeli-Palestinian peace process and the impasse which has fueled the war in Syria for almost six years.

On the same day that various world leaders spoke in less than diplomatic terms about the regime of Bashar al-Assad, the president of Syria, after the collapse of a ceasefire agreement negotiated by the U.S. and Russia, and the worst bombing of a humanitarian convey, the North American president said he was disposed to give another chance to his diplomatic strategy because, as he repeated, “in a place like Syria, no military solution is possible.”*

Beyond a brief reference to the war in Syria, Obama enumerated other challenges and global concerns such as the proliferation of nuclear arms, condemning the recent “provocative” [nuclear] tests conducted by the North Korean regime; the expansion of fundamentalist groups and of regimes nostalgic for a golden era, definitions which fit the jihadi movements such as the Islamic State and Boko Haram as much as the Russian maneuvers on the border with Ukraine; and another concern, the Zika virus, which knows no borders.

The president counterposed the complex problems which he will leave pending when he abandons the White House with the “successes” achieved by his administration and the international community, such as the signing of the great Paris accord to combat global warming, or the concerted response which enabled the containment of the Ebola epidemic in West Africa.

But Obama used his most passionate tone in New York defending the principles of dignity, transparency, diversity and tolerance, whose respect involves a “course correction” in globalization movements, “as too often, those trumpeting the benefits of globalization have ignored inequality within and among nations.”** Along with defending these principles, Obama encouraged the rejection of “aggressive” recipes such as protectionism and nationalism. They are, he stressed, “a crude populism — sometimes from the far left, but more often from the far right — which seeks to restore what they believe was a better, simpler age free of outside contamination,” warning against the temptation of favoring “the strong man” and measures that call into question transparency and democratic institutions. “There appears to be [a] growing contest between authoritarianism and liberalism right now. And I want everybody to understand, I am not neutral in that contest,” Obama reflected.

The president of the U.S. also asked the leaders in New York to “reject all forms of racism and fundamentalism” and most of all to avoid “a darker and more cynical view of history” which foments division and violence. “Each of us as leaders, each nation can choose to reject those who appeal to our worst impulses and embrace those who appeal to our best,” he suggested. Without naming names, Obama criticized leaders who seek legitimacy “not because of policies or programs but by resorting to persecuting political opposition, or demonizing other religious sects.”**

"Today, a nation ringed by walls would only imprison itself,” he emphasized.

*Editor’s note: This quotation, accurately translated from the article, is a paraphrase of President Obama’s exact quote in his speech to the United Nations.

**Translator’s note: This is not an exact translation of the author’s original quote or translation of the UN speech, but it is an exact quote from the text of Obama’s final speech at the UN.





Obama despede-se da ONU com defesa de legado e ataque ao populismo
Rita Siza
20/09/2016 - 20:53


No seu derradeiro discurso perante a Assembleia Geral das Nações Unidas, o Presidente dos Estados Unidos, Barack Obama, defendeu o seu legado de política externa e a sua abordagem na resposta às grandes crises internacionais, caracterizada, como explicou, por uma profunda crença no funcionamento da diplomacia, na cooperação entre os países e no multilateralismo. Uma abordagem que tanto explica os grandes sucessos da sua Administração – o histórico acordo internacional para a supervisão do programa nuclear do Irão ou a normalização das relações bilaterais com Cuba, por exemplo – como os seus principais falhanços, do paralisado processo de paz israelo-palestiniano, ao impasse que alimenta a guerra da Síria, há quase seis anos.
No mesmo dia em que vários líderes mundiais falaram em termos menos diplomáticos sobre o regime do Presidente da Síria, Bashar al-Assad, após o colapso de um acordo de cessar-fogo negociado pelos EUA e a Rússia e o pior bombardeamento de uma coluna humanitária, o Presidente norte-americano disse estar disposto a dar mais uma oportunidade à sua estratégia diplomática. Até porque, “num lugar como a Síria, não há nenhuma vitória militar possível”, repetiu.
PUB
Além da breve referência à guerra na Síria, Obama enumerou outros desafios e preocupações globais, como a proliferação de armas nucleares – a censura foi para os recentes ensaios “provocatórios” conduzidos pelo regime da Coreia do Norte –; a expansão de grupos fundamentalistas e de regimes nostálgicos com a era imperial – definições que tanto enquadram os movimentos jihadistas como o Estado Islâmico e o Boko Haram, como as manobras da Rússia na fronteira com a Ucrânia –, ou o desconhecimento de vírus como o Zika.
Aos problemas complexos que deixará pendentes quando abandonar a Casa Branca, o Presidente contrapôs os “sucessos” alcançados pela sua Administração e a comunidade internacional, como a assinatura do grande acordo de Paris para o combate às alterações climáticas, ou a resposta concertada que permitiu conter a epidemia de ébola na África Ocidental.
Mas o tom mais apaixonado que Obama usou em Nova Iorque foi na defesa dos princípios da dignidade, transparência, diversidade e tolerância, cujo respeito implica uma “correcção do rumo” dos movimentos de globalização, “que muitas vezes ignoraram o crescimento das desigualdades”, bem como a rejeição de receitas “agressivas” como o proteccionismo e o nacionalismo. “Há fenómenos populistas, na extrema-esquerda mas mais frequentemente na extrema-direita, que procuram restabelecer uma ordem mais simples e livre de contaminações exteriores”, assinalou, alertando contra a “tentação dos homens fortes e providenciais” que põem em causa a transparência e as instituições democráticas. “Parece que há um conflito crescente entre autoritarismo e liberalismo, e nesse conflito não se pode manter a neutralidade”, considerou Obama.
O Presidente dos EUA também pediu aos líderes em Nova Iorque para “rejeitar todas as formas de racismo e fundamentalismo”, e sobretudo para evitar as “visões negras e cínicas” que fomentam a divisão e a violência: “Podemos ignorar os nossos piores impulsos e abraçar os melhores”, sugeriu. Sem referir nomes, Obama criticou os líderes que buscam legitimidade não “através dos seus programas políticos mas pela demonização de outras religiões ou pelo acirramento da fúria contra imigrantes e refugiados inocentes”. “No mundo de hoje, quem defende a construção de muros sabe que eles só servem para nos aprisionar”, sublinhou.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Topics

India: What if Trump Has Just Started Another ‘Forever War’?

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Related Articles

Venezuela: Trump’s Foreign Policy

Germany: Trump’s Attack on Harvard: A Campaign against Science

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

China: White House Peddling Snake Oil as Medicine

Previous article
Next article