Donnie Trump ‘Em’s Trade War

Published in Wen Wei Po
(Hong Kong) on 2 March 2017
by Lau Si Lou (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Chase Coulson. Edited by Christine Murrison.
The U.S. International Trade Commission recently issued a notice that China's passenger car tire imports did not constitute any substantial damage or threat to the U.S. automotive industry, and that U.S. Customs would not impose any anti-dumping or anti-subsidy tariffs on China's passenger car tire imports. The Trade Investigation Bureau of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) responded that the U.S. International Trade Commission's ruling was objective and in line with the facts, and the Chinese expressed appreciation for the fairness of the ruling.

This author strongly believes that China is highly reluctant to openly assert that, if the United States imposed punitive tariffs on Chinese tires, U.S. car buyers would have serious trouble getting their hands on low-cost, high-quality alternatives, thus putting unnecessary burdens on the consumer. There has been a laundry list of attacks on China by rookie president Donald J. Trump; from day one he began attacking Sino-U.S. trade as unfair, on the grounds that China has obtained a great trade surplus through manipulation of the exchange rate, and he intends to declare China a currency manipulator, allowing him to impose punitive tariffs on Chinese products. Many analysts believe that the imposition of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy tariffs by the U.S. is no small wonder, but the fact that so far there have been no tariffs could knock down many an analyst with a feather. When the Trump administration finally does come to its senses and begins weighing the pros and cons, it will find that launching a trade war with China would be a losing proposition.

If past commanders-in-chief have been political presidents, then Trump — an economic president — has to be the economic yin to their political yang, not only because he comes from the business world, but also because he has seen the terrible ramifications that stemmed from the United States indulging too liberally in the speculative financial bubbles of the fictitious economy, while turning a blind eye to its goods and services economic base that resulted in a hollowing out of America’s real economy. And so our intrepid hero “The Donald” is bound and determined to wrest the manufacturing industry back from the hands of the Chinese, who pulled off the “greatest theft in history.” Trump has been in office for more than a month now, and has spent the majority of that time bogged down in international issues with no settlement or forward motion in sight, yet he still enjoys a great deal of support.

However, Mr. Trump must realize that returning the manufacturing industry to the United States is a hefty proposition, and going so far as to threaten and intimidate others with an even bigger bat will prove fruitless because his actions and policies inherently go against the current tide of globalization.

Trump has pressured Apple CEO Tim Cook to bring Apple's smartphone production lines back home from China. The iPhone has always been designed in California, though the parts come from more than 700 suppliers around the world. Apparently, Mr. Trump feels that there is no point in mentioning the fact that the cost of assembling an iPhone in China is less than $10, and if that same phone were assembled in the United States, U.S. consumers would have to pay $30 or $40 more; if those same parts were manufactured in the United States, then the iPhone would cost hundreds of dollars more. In an economically globalized world, products manufactured entirely in one country, especially high-tech products, are getting rarer as days go by.

For Mr. Trump, the subject of trade imbalances is an even more convoluted question. Before Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s two meetings with Mr. Trump in early February, the U.S. Department of Commerce had already announced that, of last year's U.S. trade deficit, Japan accounted for 9.4 percent of the total, up 0.2 percentage points over the previous year. It also bears mentioning that in the auto industry Trump has so vehemently accused of unfair trade practices so often, there was a huge growth in last year's trade deficit of $52.6 billion, which increased by $48.9 billion over the previous year, accounting for 80 percent of the total deficit. Although the Japanese auto industry has taken great pains to expand production in the United States, the vehicles Japan sold to the United States are high quality and the average unit price has risen, resulting in further expansion of the deficit.

With a total of $297 billion, which blew China’s $245 billion out of the water, the title for trade surpluses in 2016 has to go to Germany. Some analysts claim that Germany has replaced China as “the one with its head on Trump’s chopping block,” because after all, he who sticks his neck out is liable to get it cut off. Trump is absolutely fuming and now has Germany right in his sights, accusing the country of manipulating the euro’s exchange rate so that it profits off trade at the expense of the U.S. Seeing as there has been little change to the average German worker’s wages over the past 14 years, American economists have thus accused the German government of intentionally suppressing wages, thereby reducing German manufacturing costs and boosting the country’s competitiveness on the world market.

The stiff competition that high-quality automobiles and other consumer products from Japan and Germany present to the United States are what is giving it fits, not trade agreements with the Middle Kingdom, which are highly complementary. The Trump administration should sit down calmly and assess the situation, then look in the mirror and seriously contemplate whether it actually wants to fight a trade war with China or to maintain cooperation, mutual benefit and common development.


從中德日對美貿易看特朗普的貿易戰
2017-03-02
劉斯路 資深評論員
美國國際貿易委員會日前發佈公告,認定自中國進口的卡客車輪胎並未對美國的產業構成實質損害或威脅,美國海關將不對中國進口的卡客車輪胎徵收反傾銷和反補貼稅。對此,中國商務部貿易調查局回應,美國國際貿易委員會的裁決符合客觀事實,做出公正的裁決,中方表示讚賞。
筆者相信,有一點中國不方便講的,那就是,如果美國對中國輪胎徵收懲罰性關稅,那麼美國的汽車用戶難以獲得價廉質優的替代品,負擔必然增加。美國新總統特朗普一直攻擊中美貿易不公平,中國通過匯率操縱獲得大量貿易順差,要宣佈中國為匯率操縱國,要向中國產品徵收懲罰性關稅等等。裁決前不少分析家認為,美國對中國輪胎徵收反傾銷和反補貼稅並不出奇。如今,不加徵稅倒有些意外。事實上,特朗普團隊冷靜下來,權衡利弊,會發現與中國打貿易戰得不償失。
如果說,過往的美國總統是政治總統,那麼特朗普就是經濟總統,這不但因為他是商人出身,而且他看到美國過去沉迷於虛擬經濟,忽視實體經濟,造成經濟空洞化,特朗普決心令製造業回流。他上任個多月來,在許多國際問題進退失據,但是在國內問題還是有相當多支持者。
但是,特朗普必須認識到,讓製造業回流美國並非易事,即使他用再大的威嚇手段也難奏效,因為這是逆全球化而動。特朗普向蘋果公司CEO庫克施壓,讓蘋果手機的生產線從中國遷回美國。 可是,蘋果手機的設計在加利福尼亞,但零件來自世界各地700多個供應商,在中國組裝的成本還不到10美元,根本不值一提。如果在美國組裝,美國消費者則不得不多支付三四十美元;如果更多的零件在美國製造,售價會多出上百美元。在全球化的世界,要找到一件產品,尤其是高科技產品,完全由一個國家生產出來的,情況越來越難。
說到貿易不平衡,就更複雜。2月初,日本首相安倍二次朝見特朗普之前,美國商務部公佈去年商品貿易收支,美國的貿易逆差中,日本佔比率為9.4%,比上年上升0.2個百分點。值得一提的是,被特朗普多次指責不公平貿易的汽車業,去年的貿易逆差達526億美元,較前年的489億美元大幅成長,佔對日逆差總額的8成。日本汽車業者雖努力在美擴產,但日本銷往美國的汽車多為高級車款,平均單價上漲,造成逆差進一步擴大。
2016年對美貿易順差的冠軍是德國,達到了2,970億美元,超過中國的2,450億美元。有分析家說,德國取代中國,成為特朗普打擊的「出頭鳥」。的確特朗普非常憤怒,也指責德國操縱歐元匯率,令德國對美貿易獲利。美國的經濟學家還指責德國政府,長期故意壓制德國工人的工資,過去14年德國工人的工資幾乎沒太多變化,從而降低德國製造業的成本,提高競爭力。
日本、德國在汽車等高消費產品對美國構成激烈競爭,倒是中國與美國貿易互補性強。特朗普團隊應冷靜分析,認真思考究竟是要和中國打貿易戰,還是保持合作,互補互利,共同發展。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Pakistan: Trump’s Gaza Blueprint Unfolds

Topics

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Related Articles

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate