Does This Guy Have Nothing Better To Do?

Published in El País
(Spain) on 8 July 2017
by Francisco G. Basterra (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Annabel Gill. Edited by Christine Murrison.
Trump subjects international order to maximum unpredictability.

The president of the United States, the world's greatest nuisance, took advantage of the launch of a North Korean intercontinental ballistic missile, which is supposedly capable of reaching Hawaii or even Alaska, to ask Kim Jong Un, the unpredictable and extravagant president of the poor hermit kingdom of North Korea whether or not this guy has anything better to do in his life. The bewildered U.S. allies and a good many of their fellow citizens might ask the same question of Donald Trump. Opposites are touching and two unstable personalities are creating sparks.

Does the occupant of the White House have nothing better to do than to subject the international order to maximum unpredictability, to act as the arsonist of democratic institutions, starting with the presidency that was won with the interference, or at least some kind of boost – to a degree still unknown – by Vladimir Putin's Russia? Trump encourages the division of the European Union, which is another setback to Germany, starting his second trip to the old continent with Poland, whose xenophobic, populist national government interferes with the judiciary and restricts freedom of the press. He has used Warsaw to launch a nationalistic and apocalyptic discourse, questioning if the West has the will to survive.

His constant lies, his scathing attacks on the press, the brainless dialogue he has established through his tweets, his inability to dispel doubts about the alleged Russian plot, his unusual refusal to disclose his tax returns and his inability to distinguish his presidency from the family business has buried his presidency, and he hasn’t even served six months in office.

He has already succeeded in destroying the world’s image of the United States and has increased the polarization of the country. Trump, states The Economist, is “not only the symptom of America’s divisions but a cause of them, too.” His legislative agenda is blank, despite having a Republican majority in Congress. He has not achieved his own health reform meant to replace Obama’s health care law. The law proposed by the president would leave 23 million citizens without health care, many of them people who voted for Trump.

To establish his protectionist philosophy, Trump abandoned the important Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, giving China not only an economic stake, but also a political one. He had to bury the fiasco of using Taiwan in front of Beijing, demonstrating his abysmal international ignorance, and failed, as he naively believed he could do, to cajole Xi Jinping by inviting him to his Florida mansion. He has loosened trade demands on the Asian giant to get China to halt North Korea's nuclear arms race. Beijing has not done so, and Trump has resurrected a rhetoric of military solution, applying it to a conflict that does not have one. Without a sensible policy in Asia, all the while despising Europe and eating away at the trans-Atlantic relationship, Trump worsens the relationship with Putin's Russia, this after his initial courtship and his declared admiration for the strong leadership of the Russian president. Doesn’t this guy have anything better to do?


¿Este tipo no tiene nada mejor que hacer?
Trump somete al orden internacional a la máxima imprevisibilidad
El presidente de Estados Unidos, el gran trastornador mundial, aprovechaba esta semana el lanzamiento de un misil balístico intercontinental norcoreano, supuestamente capaz de alcanzar Hawái o incluso Alaska, para preguntarle a Kim Jong-un, el también imprevisible y extravagante presidente del paupérrimo reino ermitaño de Corea del Norte: ¿No tiene este tipo nada mejor que hacer en su vida? Los desconcertados aliados de EE UU y una buena parte de sus conciudadanos podríamos plantearle la misma pregunta a Donald Trump. Los extremos se tocan y dos personalidades inestables provocan chispas.

¿No tiene nada mejor que hacer el inquilino de la Casa Blanca que someter al orden internacional a la máxima imprevisibilidad, actuar como el pirómano de las instituciones democráticas, empezando por la presidencia que alcanzó con la interferencia, o al menos algún tipo de impulso —en grado todavía desconocido—, de la Rusia de Vladímir Putin? Alienta la división de la UE, otro desplante a Alemania, iniciando su segundo viaje al viejo continente por Polonia, cuyo Gobierno, xenófobo, nacional populista, interfiere en el poder judicial y restringe la libertad de prensa. Ha utilizado Varsovia para lanzar un discurso nacionalista y apocalíptico cuestionando que Occidente tenga la voluntad de sobrevivir.

Sus constantes mentiras, sus zafios ataques a la prensa, el diálogo descerebrado que ha establecido a través de sus tuits, su incapacidad para despejar las dudas sobre la supuesta trama rusa, su insólita negativa a mostrar sus declaraciones de renta, su inepcia para distinguir la presidencia de los negocios de la familia sepultan su presidencia cuando todavía no ha cumplido los seis meses.

Ya ha logrado hundir la imagen de EE UU en el mundo e incrementado la polarización del país. Trump, afirma The Economist, no solo es el síntoma de la división, sino también su causa. Su agenda legislativa está en blanco, a pesar de contar con mayoría republicana en el Congreso. No ha conseguido su propia reforma sanitaria para sustituir al Obamacare. La ley que propone el presidente dejaría sin asistencia sanitaria a 23 millones de ciudadanos, muchos de ellos votantes de Trump.

Para establecer su filosofía proteccionista, Trump abandonó el importante acuerdo comercial transpacífico, regalándole una baza a China no solo económica, sino también política. Tuvo que tragarse el fiasco de utilizar a Taiwán frente a Pekín demostrando su abisal ignorancia internacional y no consiguió, como ingenuamente creyó, engatusar a Xi Jinping invitándole a su palacete de Florida. Aflojó las exigencias comerciales frente al gigante asiático para conseguir que China frenara la carrera nuclear de Corea del Norte. Pekín no lo ha hecho y Trump resucita una retórica de solución militar para un conflicto que no la tiene. Sin política sensata en Asia, menospreciando a Europa y erosionando la relación transatlántica, Trump empeora la relación con la Rusia de Putin, tras su cortejo inicial y su admiración declarada por el fuerte liderazgo del presidente ruso. ¿Este tipo no tiene nada mejor que hacer?
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: Canada’s Retaliatory Tariffs Hurt Canadians

Germany: Big Tech Wants a Say in EU Law: More Might for the Mighty

Taiwan: Taiwan’s Leverage in US Trade Talks

Spain: Not a Good Time for Solidarity

Mauritius: The US-Israel-Iran Triangle: from Obliteration to Mediation

Topics

Germany: Big Tech Wants a Say in EU Law: More Might for the Mighty

Germany: Trump’s Disappointment Will Have No Adverse Consequences for Putin*

             

Spain: Global Aid without the US

Spain: Not a Good Time for Solidarity

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Australia: Donald Trump Is Not the Only Moving Part When It Comes to Global Trade

Ireland: As Genocide Proceeds, Netanyahu Is Yet Again Being Feted in Washington

Related Articles

Germany: US at a Crossroads

Germany: Big Tech Wants a Say in EU Law: More Might for the Mighty

Germany: Trump’s Disappointment Will Have No Adverse Consequences for Putin*

Spain: Not a Good Time for Solidarity