Trump’s Diplomacy

Published in El Pais
(Spain) on 12 June 2018
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Kaleb Vick. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
The final word on the summit between Donald Trump and Korean President Kim Jong Un can be considered very positive and, in this sense, the meeting has been a success. North Korea is an unstable dictatorship with regard to foreign policy; it is strongly nuclearized and in recent years has conducted numerous ballistic missile tests in a growing defiance of the U.S. and its neighbors.

The pre-war hostility of just a few months ago, including the personal threats between both presidents, has disappeared. The four points signed by Trump and Kim ratify the beginning of a new era between the countries but neither party has made any specific commitments. The normalization of diplomatic relations between the United States and North Korea, the exchange of prisoners of war, the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and the signing of a peace treaty between both Koreas that definitively ends the war which was waged between 1950 and 1953 are goals that both presidents now leave in the hands of diplomats. In any case, the statement — pretentious in words, minimal in details — would not have been possible without the thaw during the Winter Olympic Games generated by South Korean President Moon Jae-in, and China’s mediation.

Contrast this diplomatic achievement of the U.S. president, and how comfortable he has been with the North Korean dictator, with the confrontations experienced between the same president and the leaders of the other six most industrialized countries in the world — which are also democracies — during the Group of Seven leading industrial nations summit last weekend in Canada. If he has built bridges with Kim Jong Un, he has dug a deep pit in front of his G-7 allies, accusing the Canadian prime minister of lying. Trump gives the impression of being better understood face-to-face with authoritarian regimes than with representatives of democracies. But these are the true partners of the United States.


La declaración final de la cumbre entre Donald Trump y el presidente de Corea del Norte, Kim Jong-un, puede considerarse muy positiva y, en este sentido, el encuentro ha sido un éxito. Corea del Norte es una dictadura inestable en política exterior, está fuertemente nuclearizada y en los últimos años ha realizado numerosos ensayos de misiles balísticos en un creciente desafío a EE UU y sus vecinos.

La hostilidad prebélica de hace apenas unos meses ha desaparecido, incluyendo las amenazas personales entre ambos mandatarios. Los cuatro puntos firmados por Trump y Kim ratifican el inicio de esta nueva era entre ambos países pero sin asumir compromisos concretos. La normalización de relaciones diplomáticas entre EE UU y Corea del Norte; el intercambio de prisioneros de guerra; la desnuclearización de la península de Corea y la firma de un tratado de paz entre ambas Coreas que ponga fin definitivamente a la guerra librada entre 1950 y 1953 constituyen unas metas que ambos presidentes dejan ahora en manos de los diplomáticos. En cualquier caso, la declaración —altisonante en las palabras, mínima en los detalles— no habría sido posible sin el deshielo protagonizado durante los Juegos Olímpicos de Invierno por el presidente de Corea del Sur, Moon Jae-in, y la mediación de China.

Contrasta este logro diplomático del presidente de EE UU —y lo cómodo que se le ha visto junto al dictador norcoreano— con los enfrentamientos vividos por el mandatario con los líderes de los otros seis países más industrializados del mundo —que además son democracias— durante la cumbre del G7 del pasado fin de semana en Canadá. Si con Kim Jong-un ha tendido puentes, frente a sus aliados del G7 ha cavado un profundo foso y ha acusado al primer ministro de Canadá de mentir. Trump da la impresión de entenderse mejor en el cara a cara con regímenes autoritarios que con representantes de democracias. Pero son estos los verdaderos socios de EE UU.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Topics

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Related Articles

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate