It was expected that in his first speech broadcast from the Oval Office, Donald Trump would declare a national emergency with respect to the situation at the southern border, but this did not happen. In fact, the real surprise was that, for a moment, we saw the businessman and reality TV star assume the role of a normal president. It was almost like being in the presence of any other politician.
Trump described the situation at the border as a growing humanitarian crisis. In fact, he acknowledged the enriching effect of immigrants on his country. He voiced concern for African-Americans and Latino workers. He expressed regret over the sexual assaults suffered by female immigrants on their journey north, and remarked that politicians and the wealthy do not put walls and railings around their homes “because they hate the people on the outside, but because they love the people on the inside.”
However, Trump’s presidential demeanor was short-lived, and he soon began accusing immigrants of being drug addicts, rapists and murderers, and of having a negative impact on his country’s economy. In general, he blamed them for virtually all of American society's ills before asking, “How much more American blood must we shed before Congress does its job?”
First, even if it were true that Trump did not hate outsiders in general, this is certainly not true of Mexicans, as he insults us at every opportunity. As for his concern for women, he must have been referring to those in his family because, as is common knowledge, the head of state has boasted that, when in the presence of women, he likes to grab their genitals.
There was absolutely nothing novel or newsworthy in his speech. No one understands why the White House asked the television networks to broadcast it during prime time since in reality it was a futile endeavor. The president did not announce what people long for most: an end to the government shutdown, which is now in its third week. Nor did he give any new reason for his stubborn resolve to build a wall along the Mexican border.
As predicted, the man in the White House lied, beginning with a description of the heinous crimes that, according to him, are committed by large numbers of immigrants. Statistics show, however, that foreigners tend to commit fewer offenses, including murder and other forms of violent crime, than those that were born and raised here.
Trump spoke repeatedly about the lack of security at the border, but figures show that far fewer people entered the country illegally during the fiscal year that ended in September 2018 than in 2014 and 2016. In contrast, the figures show that the number of individuals that entered the country legally and remained here, even after their visas had expired, doubled during this period.
The president stated that the southern border was the entry point for all manner of drugs, claiming that this was the reason for the 300 deaths caused by heroin overdoses that occur in the U.S. each week. And while it is a proven fact that 90 percent of the heroin in the U.S. does come from Mexico, it comes through legal ports of entry, including airports, meaning that a wall would not stop it.
The idea of making Mexico pay for the wall was the most successful line of his campaign. However, once he had grasped that he would not get a penny from the Mexican government, Trump claimed that Mexico would pay indirectly through the new trade agreement it had signed alongside Canada last November, which will supposedly generate a great deal of revenue for the United States. The trouble is that the agreement has not yet been approved by Congress, it is uncertain whether it will ever be approved, and even if it is, financial experts doubt whether it will, in fact, be as profitable as claimed.
Trump’s desperate maneuver to appear presidential simply did not work. His message was the same as ever: immigrants without documentation are a scourge, and only a wall can keep them in check. According to most statistics, only 30 percent, or in some cases, 40 percent, of his fellow citizens support the construction of a wall, and 50 percent are against it.
The real national crisis, say his opponents, lies in climate change, which Trump refuses to acknowledge, the endless problem of racial discrimination, the lack of access to medical care affecting 30 million Americans, and the fact that half of the elderly population has no savings to live on. And these issues have nothing to do with immigrants.
En su primer discurso trasmitido teniendo a la Oficina Oval como escenario, se esperaba que Donald Trump declarara como emergencia nacional a la frontera sur, no sucedió. De hecho la sorpresa fue que por un momento vimos al empresario, estrella de un reality show, actuando como un Presidente normal. Casi parecía que estábamos frente a un político como tantos otros.
Trump describió la situación en la frontera como una crisis humanitaria que crece. De hecho reconoció que los inmigrantes enriquecen a su país. Expresó preocupación por los afroamericanos y por los trabajadores hispanos. Lamentó los asaltos sexuales que sufren las mujeres inmigrantes en su travesía hacia el norte y dijo que los políticos y los ricos ponen bardas y rejas en sus casas “no porque odien a la gente de afuera, sino porque aman a la gente adentro”.
Pero el Trump presidencial no duró mucho, pronto empezó a culpar a los inmigrantes de ser drogadictos, violadores, asesinos y de afectar negativamente a la economía de su país. En términos generales los culpó de prácticamente todos los males que afectan a la sociedad aquí, preguntándose “¿cuánta más sangre estadunidense vamos a permitir que se derrame a causa de ellos?”
Para empezar, en caso de que fuera cierto que Trump no odia a los de afuera, seguro eso no incluye a los mexicanos, ya que en cada oportunidad que tiene nos insulta. Y en cuanto a su preocupación por las mujeres, serán las de su familia, porque es bien sabido que el mandatario ha presumido que cuando tiene mujeres enfrente, lo que le gusta es tocar sus genitales.
Nada absolutamente en su discurso fue nuevo ni noticioso. Nadie entiende porqué la Casa Blanca pidió a las cadenas de televisión que lo trasmitieran en horario estelar, ya que en realidad fue un esfuerzo inútil. El mandatario no anunció lo más ansiado: que se reabriría el Gobierno, paralizado ya en su tercera semana. Tampoco ofreció razones que no había dicho antes sobre su terquedad de construir un muro con México.
Como se sabía de antemano que ocurriría, el Jefe de la Casa Blanca dijo mentiras, empezando por describir los más horrendos delitos que según él cometen en gran número los inmigrantes. Sin embargo, las estadísticas indican que quienes son de fuera tienden a cometer menos crímenes, incluyendo asesinatos y otros delitos violentos, que aquellos nacidos y educados aquí.
Una y otra vez Trump habló de la falta de seguridad en la frontera, pero las cifras indican que en el año fiscal que terminó en septiembre de 2018, mucho menos personas entraron ilegalmente al país que en 2014 y 2016, mientras que en el mismo tiempo se duplicó el número de individuos que entraron legalmente y se quedaron aquí, aun luego de que sus visas expiraron.
El mandatario dijo que por la frontera sur entran a Estados Unidos todo tipo de drogas, por lo que, dijo, cada semana mueren 300 estadunidenses por sobredosis de heroína. Y es que está comprobado que el 90 por ciento de la heroína aquí sí proviene de México, pero ésta es introducida por los puntos legales de entrada, inclusive aeropuertos, por lo que un muro no servirá para detenerla.
Que México pagaría por el muro fue la frase más exitosa de su campaña, pero una vez convencido que el Gobierno mexicano no le dará un cinco, Trump aseguró que México pagará indirectamente con el nuevo tratado comercial que junto con Canadá se firmó en noviembre pasado y que supuestamente traerá enormes ganancias a Estados Unidos. El problema es que el acuerdo aún no ha sido aprobado por el Congreso, no se sabe si lo aprobará y, de aprobarse, los expertos en finanzas dudan de que efectivamente traerá esos enormes beneficios.
La desesperada maniobra de Trump de parecer Presidente simplemente no funcionó. Su mensaje fue el mismo: los inmigrantes sin documentos son una lacra y sólo un muro podrá frenarlos. La mayoría de las estadísticas indican que sólo un 30, o en casos 40 por ciento de sus conciudadanos apoya su construcción y un 50 por ciento se opone.
La verdadera crisis nacional, dicen sus oponentes, está en el cambio climático que Trump se niega a reconocer; en el problema racial sin fin, en la falta de atención médica que sufren 30 millones de estadunidenses y en el hecho de que la mitad de la población de la tercera edad, no tienen ahorros de qué vivir. Y con eso los inmigrantes no tienen nada que ver.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,