Trump’s Triumph

Published in Folha de São Paulo
(Brazil) on 26 Mar 2019
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Domitila Olivé. Edited by Denile Doyle.

 

 

The Investigation results strengthen the position of the president in the final stretch of his term in office.

The results of the inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 American election, disclosed this past Sunday, March 24, are certainly positive for President Donald Trump.

After nearly two years of investigation, Special Counsel Robert Mueller did not find evidence that the Republican president himself, or people tied to him, had any part in colluding with Russian authorities to influence the presidential election.

The imbroglio hung over Trump like the sword of Damocles, given its potential to lead to the initiation of impeachment proceedings.

Sticking to his usual behavior, the president celebrated the result with a reaction that ranged somewhere between euphoria and claiming he was a victim. He told journalists that the inquiry was an illegal attempt to remove him from power, which had now failed.

Attorney General William Barr published a summary of the report, which strengthens the position of the president in the final stretch of his term in office and his race for re-election.

Although it did not deliver a devastating verdict for Trump, Mueller’s investigation painted a disturbing picture. The Russian government interfered repeatedly in the American election, hacking into computers tied to the Democratic campaign; Trump's supporters, knowing what happened, did nothing.

However, according to the report, then-candidate Trump did not participate directly or coordinate such actions with Russia. The conclusions regarding attempts to halt the interaction with Russia were not as decisive. Mueller wrote, “while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,” listing actions that Trump took which could be interpreted as obstruction of justice.

Drawing any conclusion about the severity and extent of such conduct depends on the release of the full report. A fight among Democrats to make Barr deliver the full report to Congress and the evidence supporting its findings probably lies ahead in a dispute may reach the court.

In short, even though the special counsel's findings mean an undeniable political triumph for Trump, it is too soon to tell if the battle, which has been going on since the beginning of his term, will play to his advantage.


Resultado de investigação robustece o presidente na reta final de seu mandato

As conclusões da investigação sobre a interferência da Rússia no pleito americano de 2016, conhecidas no domingo (24), são por certo alvissareiras para o presidente dos Estados Unidos, Donald Trump.

Após quase dois anos de averiguações, o procurador Robert Mueller não encontrou evidências de que o republicano ou pessoas a ele ligadas tenham agido em conluio com autoridades russas para influenciar a eleição presidencial.

O imbróglio pendia como uma espada de Dâmocles sobre Trump, dado o potencial de desencadear um processo de impeachment.

Bem à sua maneira, o mandatário comemorou o resultado oscilando entre euforia e vitimismo. A jornalistas, disse que a investigação fora uma tentativa ilegal de apeá-lo do poder que havia falhado.

O sumário da apuração, tornado público pelo secretário de Justiça, William Barr, robustece o presidente na reta final de seu mandato e na disputa pela reeleição.

Mesmo não tendo chegado a um veredito devastador para o republicano, o escrutínio de Mueller revelou um quadro preocupante. O governo russo interferiu de modo reiterado no pleito americano, invadindo computadores ligados à campanha democrata; partidários de Trump, ao tomar conhecimento do fato, nada fizeram.

Tais ações, no entanto, não contaram com a participação direta, ou coordenação, do então candidato, segundo o documento.

Menos peremptórias foram as conclusões acerca de tentativas de atrapalhar a apuração. “Enquanto este relatório não conclui que o presidente tenha cometido um crime, ele tampouco o isenta”, escreveu Mueller, listando atos de Trump que podem vir a ser interpretados como obstrução da Justiça.

A avaliação da gravidade e da extensão dessas condutas depende, porém, da liberação de todo o documento. Espera-se agora uma luta dos democratas para obrigar Barr a entregar ao Congresso a íntegra do relatório e as evidências que o acompanham, numa disputa que pode chegar aos tribunais.

Em resumo, embora as afirmações do procurador constituam vitória política inequívoca de Trump, é cedo para dizer que a batalha em andamento desde o início de seu mandato está decidida a seu favor.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Donald Trump, Ice Cold Narcissist

Saudi Arabia: Imposing Peace Through War

India: US Sutra | America Is at War with Itself: Minnesota Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Australia: US Citizens Are Becoming Collateral Damage in Donald Trump’s Quest To Deport Immigrants

Philippines: ‘Bye, Bye, Miss American Pie’

Topics

South Korea: ICE: A Cold That Cuts Flesh

Egypt: Davos 2026 and the Reshaping of the International Order: The Trump–El-Sisi Summit

Saudi Arabia: Imposing Peace Through War

India: US Sutra | America Is at War with Itself: Minnesota Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Australia: Donald Trump’s Many Foreign Policy Bluffs Come at a Political Price

Australia: Donald Trump Has Iran in His Sights, but What Is His Endgame?

Austria: Donald Trump, Ice Cold Narcissist

Ireland: Ireland’s Reluctance To Speak Out against Trump’s Board of Peace Is Shameful

Related Articles

Germany: Alex Pretti Killing in Minneapolis: The Camera as a Weapon

Egypt: Davos 2026 and the Reshaping of the International Order: The Trump–El-Sisi Summit

Saudi Arabia: Imposing Peace Through War

India: US Sutra | America Is at War with Itself: Minnesota Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Australia: Donald Trump’s Many Foreign Policy Bluffs Come at a Political Price