The Iran crisis that U.S. President Donald Trump was hoping for has taken on the form the White House was going after. In order to reinforce Israel’s security strategy in the Middle East and Saudi Arabia’s hegemonic ambitions over the Persian Gulf, Trump has been vilifying Barack Obama’s nuclear deal with the republic of the ayatollahs since the 2016 election campaign, a deal that was backed by the European Union, Russia and China. From the moment the president decided to leave the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and impose sanctions on Iran, an escalation of tensions was only to be expected. The first step was Iranian President Hassan Rouhani announcing his decision to stop selling surplus enriched uranium and heavy water, raising warning flags, because it means that—regardless of the veneer of ad hoc diplomacy—the Iranian regime is ignoring the accord, or, at the very least, setting conditions to stay.
The impact of this dissension could be huge within the EU, which must apply the Blockage Statute to safeguard the interests of Iranian investors and neutralize any possible retaliation on the part of the United States against European companies. At the same time, the EU cannot wash its hands of a new nuclear arms race in the Gulf, which will surely have an impact the price of oil and the stability of the region. This is a prospect which threatens to fracture the always precarious unity of external action of the 28 member states.
Escalada en la crisis EEUU- Irán
A partir del momento en que Trump optó por abandonar el acuerdo nuclear, solo cabÃa esperar una escalada de la tensión
Los efectos del choque de trenes pueden ser enormes en el seno de la UE, que debe proteger los intereses de los inversores en Irán con la aplicación del Estatuto de Bloqueo para neutralizar eventuales represalias de Estados Unidos contra empresas europeas y, al mismo tiempo, no puede desentenderse de una nueva carrera nuclear en el Golfo con una repercusión segura en el precio del petróleo y la estabilidad en la región. Un panorama que amenaza con fracturar la siempre precaria unidad de acción exterior de los Veintiocho.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
Whether George HW Bush or Donald J Trump, Americanimperialism is unabated—the pathetic excuses and the violentshock-and-awe tactics don’t matter; the results do.
Whether George HW Bush or Donald J Trump, Americanimperialism is unabated—the pathetic excuses and the violentshock-and-awe tactics don’t matter; the results do.
Washington is no longer content with slow exhaustion; it has adopted a strategy of swift, symbolic strikes designed to recalibrate the international landscape.
It would be a mistake to assume that Netanyahu dictates Trump’s Middle East agenda. It would also be a mistake to allow Netanyahu to tailor American priorities to Israel’s political and military actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria.