On Wednesday, the Iranian government announced that it will cease to comply with “some” of the “commitments” it assumed in the international accord on its nuclear program signed in 2015. This came in response to the unilateral decision by the Trump administration a year ago to withdraw from this pact and reestablish sanctions against the Persian nation. Tehran also warned that it would not meet other commitments if the remaining signatories of the accord (Germany, France, United Kingdom, China and Russia) do not find a solution within 60 days to ease the effects of U.S. sanctions, particularly those affecting the Iranian oil and banking sectors.
As expected, this announcement generated concern within the international community, since Manichean positions, such as those adopted by the U.S. and now announced by Iran, often lead to extreme decisions. And these, in turn, can translate into actions as disastrous as the proliferation of a nuclear arms race in one of the most unstable and conflicted zones on the planet, or armed conflicts, which is precisely what is currently at stake.
In fact, the most reckless actors on this chessboard, such as Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have already started beating the drums of war. Netanyahu, after learning of Tehran’s decision, warned that “Israel will not allow Iran to take control of nuclear weapons. We will continue fighting those who want to wipe us out.” A veiled threat behind one of the worst scenarios for the “resolution” of this conflict.
El miércoles, el Gobierno de Irán anunció que dejará de cumplir con “algunos” de los “compromisos” que asumió en el acuerdo internacional sobre su programa nuclear suscrito en 2015. Esto en respuesta a la decisión unilateral del gobierno de Trump de retirarse de ese pacto hace un año y restablecer las sanciones contra la nación persa. Teherán también advirtió con renunciar a otros compromisos si los restantes signatarios del acuerdo (Alemania, Francia, Reino Unido, China y Rusia) no encuentran una solución en 60 días para aliviar los efectos de las sanciones estadounidenses, en particular las que afectan a los sectores petrolero y bancario iraníes.
Como es de suponer, este anuncio generó preocupación en la comunidad internacional, pues posiciones maniqueas, como la que ha adoptado EEUU y la que ahora anuncia Irán, suelen derivar en decisiones extremas. Y éstas a su vez pueden traducirse en acciones tan nefastas como la proliferación de una carrera armamentista nuclear en una de las zonas más inestables y conflictivas del planeta o conflictos armados, que es justamente lo que se encuentra actualmente en juego.
De hecho, los actores más temerarios de este tablero de ajedrez ya han comenzado a hacer sonar tambores de guerra, como el primer ministro israelí, Benjamín Netanyahu, quien tras conocer la decisión de Teherán advirtió que “Israel no permitirá que Irán se haga con el arma atómica. Seguiremos combatiendo a quienes quieren destruirnos”. Una velada amenaza detrás de uno de los peores escenarios para la “resolución” de este conflicto.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The elderly president, vengeful and bearing a grudge, is conducting an all-out war against individuals, private and public institutions, cities and against U.S. states.
These countries ... have demonstrated that moral courage can coexist with diplomacy and that choosing humanity over expediency carries weight on the international stage.
These countries ... have demonstrated that moral courage can coexist with diplomacy and that choosing humanity over expediency carries weight on the international stage.
The relationship between Israel and the U.S. is increasingly marked by complexity and asymmetry: West Jerusalem continues to pursue its goals ... while Washington, despite growing fatigue with the conflict, remains reluctant to openly confront Netanyahu.