Mexico Says No To Becoming a Safe 3rd Country

Published in El heraldo de México
(Mexico) on 28 August 2019
by Alfredo González Castro (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Tom Walker. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
Fifteen days ahead of time, the Mexican Senate and the Foreign Ministry have responded in the negative to Donald Trump’s request.

Without much fuss, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Mexican Senate reached an important agreement Aug. 22: they said no to the possibility of Mexico becoming a “safe third country.”

They did this 15 days before the date the Trump administration set for resuming talks and reviewing the outcome of our country’s immigration policy, established some months ago to tackle the crisis resulting from the caravans of people from Central America.

Until last night, there was no information as to whether there would be a response from Washington, but on this side of the border, authorities believe that the Trump administration will not be at all pleased that the Foreign Ministry and the legislature are closing ranks.

The Trump administration was not pleased with this because the Mexican government has, in effect, ruled out the possibility that Mexico can become a permanent refuge for undocumented persons from any country in the world, and especially from Central America.

That is a foregone conclusion. And if the U.S. does not like it, we will consider how that affects us, a high-ranking Mexican government official told me.

This past Monday, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador also said there will be a meeting between U.S. and Mexican authorities to discuss the immigration issue on Sept. 10. And he emphasized that his government is complying with its commitment to regulate immigration in our country as agreed and on time.

President Lopez Obrador’s statement and the agreement between the Senate and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, advances the regulation of immigration as we get closer to Sept. 5, Trump’s deadline for Mexico to regulate the flow of immigrants in exchange for not imposing tariffs on all Mexican exports to the U.S.

Not only that, but looking ahead to the Initial Government Report this coming Sept. 1, the 4T will promote all this as a great achievement.*

And that is no surprise, because the way things have turned out, foreign policy is one of the few fields in which López Obrador’s government has halfway held its own.

In fits and starts, the exodus of immigrants to the U.S. has slowed. In May, for example, officials recorded the passage of 144,000 people into the United States without documentation, a shocking historic high.

In August, it fell to 70,000, a little less than half. This means they have been getting something right.

That, along with agreements achieved with other countries and the containment of the crisis in the domestic diplomatic corps, leaves Mexican Secretary of Foreign Affairs Marcelo Ebrard looking good. What we haven’t seen yet is how the U.S. will respond to Mexico saying no to becoming a safe third country.

*Translator’s note: “The 4T” refers to the assertion by current Mexican President López Obrador, that his six-year term as president will constitute a “fourth transformation” in Mexican history, on a par with the three accepted turning points in Mexican history: independence, reform and revolution.


México dijo no al tercer país seguro
Con 15 días de anticipación, el Senado y la cancillería respondieron con una negativa a la petición de Donald Trump

Sin tanto ruido, la Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores y el Senado de la República lograron un importante acuerdo el pasado 22 de agosto: dijeron no a la posibilidad de convertir a México en “tercer país seguro”.

Lo hicieron 15 días antes de la fecha establecida por el gobierno de Donald Trump para reanudar conversaciones y revisar los resultados de la política migratoria de nuestro gobierno, establecida hace unos meses para enfrentar la crisis derivada de las caravanas de centroamericanos.

Hasta ayer por la noche, no se tenía información oficial sobre si hubo o no una respuesta de Washington, pero de este lado de la frontera nuestras autoridades piensan y sienten que a la administración Trump no le agradó en absoluto el cierre de filas de la cancillería y el Poder Legislativo mexicanos.

No le gustó porque cancelan de facto la posibilidad de que el territorio mexicano se convierta en un refugio permanente para indocumentados provenientes de cualquier país del mundo, sobre todo de Centroamérica.

Ya está cantado el tiro. Y si no les gusta, vamos a ver de a cómo nos toca, me dijo un alto funcionario federal.

El lunes pasado, el presidente Andrés Manuel López Obrador informó a su vez que el próximo 10 de septiembre habrá un encuentro entre autoridades de EU y México para analizar el tema migratorio.

Y aseguró que su gobierno está cumpliendo en tiempo y forma con el compromiso adquirido para ordenar la migración en nuestro país.

Con esta declaración y el acuerdo entre el Senado y la SRE, nos adelanta cómo viene la cosa para el 5 de septiembre, que fue la fecha del ultimátum que Trump impuso para que México “ordenara” el paso de migrantes a cambio de no enfrentar la imposición de aranceles a todas sus exportaciones.

No sólo eso, de cara al Primer Informe de Gobierno, el próximo 1 de septiembre, la 4T venderá todo esto como un gran logro.

Y no es para menos, porque haya sido con haya sido, la política exterior es uno de los pocos rubros en los que la administración de AMLO ha salido medianamente bien librada.

Con sus bemoles, frenó el éxodo de migrantes a EU. Por ejemplo, en el mes de mayo se registró el paso de 144 mil indocumentados a territorio estadounidense, una cifra histórica y escandalosa.

Para el mes de agosto bajaron a 70 mil, es decir, a poco menos de la mitad. Lo que significa que algo hicieron bien.

Eso, junto con los acuerdos alcanzados con otros países y el freno a la crisis del cuerpo diplomático doméstico, dejan bien parado al responsable de la política exterior mexicana, Marcelo Ebrard. Sólo falta conocer la respuesta de EU al “no” de México a ser tercer país seguro.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Australia: Donald Trump Is Taking Over the US Federal Reserve and Financial Markets Have Missed the Point

Canada: Minnesota School Shooting Is Just More Proof That America Is Crazed

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Poland: Ukraine Is Still Far from Peace. What Was Actually Decided at the White House?

Topics

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Related Articles

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump