Benign China-US Interaction a Positive Trend

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 20 September 2019
by Wei Shaozhen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Liza Roberts. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
The United States recently published three lists of goods from China involving a total of 437 items on which it will lift tariffs. This is the largest case of the United States removing tariffs to date and is widely regarded as a positive gesture from Washington.

Second-tier China-U.S. economic and trade negotiations are now being held to prepare for next month’s high level China-U.S. economic and trade talks. Both China and the United States have recently announced the elimination of tariffs on certain commodities. The elimination of these taxes will not affect the overall trade situation between the two countries, but they do constitute a benign interaction between the two sides that may be beneficial to next month’s talks.

One might describe the China-U.S. trade war as confusing. The two sides are taking conflicting positions, and it is difficult to say whether or not they are any closer to reaching an agreement as they travel further apart. Regardless of the trade war and the overall relationship between China and the United States, there remain many different possible outcomes.

For example, we must ask whether the trade war is a matter of dispute over national interests, or is the U.S. simply attempting to challenge China's strategic attack? We believe that the elite group in Washington is going after profits by taking extreme strategic actions. How the situation develops will depend on the interaction between China and the United States and how different opinions on the issues will be resolved in the United States.

It is not easy for China and the United States to engage in benign interaction at the moment. In addition to the need for both sides to maintain their negotiating position, the trade war has objectively altered the public’s perception of the other within the two countries. Presently, the public in both the United States and in China is more likely to approve countermeasures to avoid confrontation. Acts of goodwill require public approval before they are put in place, while actual operations have to be approached more cautiously.

However, heated public opinion does not necessarily reflect the true feelings of the public in both countries, and such public opinion does not necessarily reflect the people’s wishes. In the United States, the trade postures of both parties in Congress are very tough, and Fox News broadcasts plenty of incendiary reports. However, in various noticeable ways, the American public hopes that its desire for the trade war to end as soon as possible can be clearly seen. Not only does the U.S. stock market welcome any good news from negotiations between the two countries, the various speeches by senior government officials also suggest that if a trade agreement can be reached before the election, United States public will welcome that result most heartily.

That the China-U.S. trade war has reached the scale it has today must have been unimaginable to both sides; indeed, the worst case scenario imagined by either side. If such a trade war continues, the serious adverse effects are self-evident. Even if they are not fully visible today, they will certainly not go undetected in the future. The politicization of economic consequences is also certain. The trade war will continue indefinitely, and the final test will be the political endurance of China and the United States. It can be said with certainty that such a political test carries greater risks for the U.S. than it does for China.

In reality, both China and the United States have good reason to take advantage of the upcoming 13th round of high-level economic and trade negotiations. In both the previous and current rounds of these consultations, China and the United States engaged in volatile confrontations and communication restarts, further testing the will and strength of both sides, but also exposing the explosive nature of the trade war.

If we consider the trade war to be an international strategy, certainly no one in any country will ever welcome such an approach. However, in response to real public opinion, achieving the end of the trade war or its soft landing is a challenging task that is much more complicated than escalating trade wars. We believe the words and deeds that help ease the tensions of the trade war help the two sides to think calmly about providing reasons to ease demands on the other side and should be regarded as evidence of goodwill. We should support and encourage such positive signals, whether from the Chinese or the U.S., and the other side should respond positively as well.

There are some ideas in Chinese and American societies that contradict each other. However, despite the power of both countries, neither possesses the ability to realize those extreme ideas, and they do not have the determination to bear the massive costs associated with implementing them. Moreover, this is an increasingly realistic and secular world. If you shout and create a disturbance, the most members of the public will definitely reject you. There is a chance that China and the United States could be dismantled by all kinds of secular interests when they confront each other. This trade war is destined to reach epic proportions and will be a crime against history, and mark a historical trend. Ending the trade war, no matter how difficult it is right now, will certainly be viewed as a positive moment in history.




美国方面近日公布了3份对中国加征关税商品的排除清单,共涉及437项商品。这是美方关税排除规模最大的一次,被广泛看成华盛顿的一个积极姿态。

中美副部长级经贸磋商正在举行,为下月初的中美高级别经贸磋商做准备。中美近来都宣布了对部分商品的关税排除,这些排除影响不了两国关税战的整体形势,但某种意义上构成了双方的良性互动,对下月的高级别经贸磋商取得进展是有利的。

中美贸易战形势可谓扑朔迷离,双方是处在相互冲突愈演愈烈的路上,还是打得越厉害越接近达成协议,真是很难说。无论贸易战,还是中美整体关系都存在不同走向的可能。

比如贸易战究竟是利益纠纷,还是美方要搞垮中国的战略性攻击呢?我们认为,追求利益和很极端的战略考量在华盛顿的精英群体中都存在。事情究竟朝哪个方向发展取决于中美互动,以及美方内部不同意见博弈的结果。

中美当下搞良性互动应当说并不容易。除了双方都需要维护自己的谈判地位外,贸易战客观上在两国社会内部都进行了强硬对待对方的动员。当下无论在美国还是在中国,出对抗的措施都更容易获得掌声,释放善意则需要那样做的理由,现实操作也不得不更谨慎。

然而激烈的舆论未必就是两国社会的真实态度,与人们的愿望不一定合拍。拿美国来说,国会两党的贸易战姿态都挺强硬的,福克斯电视台充满了刺激的言论,然而透过各种细节,美国社会希望早日结束贸易战的愿望还是可以挺清楚看到的。不仅美国股市欢迎两国谈判的任何好消息,政府高官的各种谈话也显示出,如果能够在大选前达成经贸协议,将是美方最愿意看到的结果。

中美贸易战打成今天的规模,肯定是当初双方都没有想到的,或者说是当初双方预期的“最坏情况”。这样的贸易战持续下去,严重的负面效果不言而喻,即使今天没有充分显露出来,它们也肯定跑不了。经济后果政治化也是铁定的。贸易战无限打下去,最终考验的是中美两国的政治承受力,可以肯定地说,那样的政治考验对美方来说比对中方有着大得多的风险和不确定性。

实际上中美都有珍惜即将到来的第十三轮高级别经贸磋商的充分理由。在上一轮和这一轮磋商中间,中美经历了很动荡的交锋和沟通重启,进一步检验了双方的意志和实力,同时也垒高了贸易战的爆炸当量。

把贸易战作为国际间的战略清算,决不会有一个国家的人民真正欢迎它。然而如何对应真实的民意,实现贸易战的退出或者它的软着陆,却是富有挑战的工作,比开打和升级贸易战要复杂得多。有助于缓和贸易战节奏,支持双方冷静思考,为对方缓和行动提供理由的那些言行,我们认为都应当被视为释放善意。这样的积极信号无论是中方的还是美方的,都应给予支持和鼓励,还应当得到对方的积极回应。

中美社会中都有一些针对对方很冲动的想法,但是鉴于中美都是有力量的大国,双方都缺少将那些极端念头加以实现的能力,也不真正具有为实施它们而承受巨大代价的决心。加上这是一个越来越现实、世俗的世界,喊一喊可以,真正搞大国战略对撞肯定是不受大多数社会成员欢迎的。中美存在对抗搞着搞着就被种种世俗利益瓦解的很高概率,硬撑着要推动中美打“史诗级”贸易战注定是对历史大势的“顶风作案”。结束贸易战无论在当前有多难,历史地看,它一定会被视为从善如流。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Topics

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Related Articles

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Canada: Putin Is Negotiating Victory, Not Peace

Trinidad and Tobago: US, Venezuela and the Caribbean: Diplomacy First