Remembering Fall of Berlin Wall, the West Should Tear Down Its Walls

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 9 November 2019
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Tyler Ruzicka. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
Thirty years ago on Nov. 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall fell, followed by the collapse of the Soviet Union two years later. Today, as we look back on this history, what will we think about? Will we wonder why the West's victory march was so short-lived, or will we think about the influence that day has had on major global changes happening today?

The fall of the Berlin Wall was seen as an important symbol of the end of the Cold War. So, for a while, the West felt a sense of victory, thinking it had reached the "end of history." However, the world is in constant transition. With the words "end of history" still ringing in the West’s ears, disappointment and instability spread through the West like a virus. In particular, the Western financial crisis of 2008 that swept the globe caused a collapse of morale from within the walls of its fortress. Those who had once celebrated victory started to use words like "recession" and "failure" to describe the financial system. However, they weren't willing to accept that the cause of this instability was the failure of the Western system.

Changes in the global economy illustrate this clearly. From 1980 to 2007, developed economies made up 59% of the world's economic activity on average (based on purchasing power parity), while developing economies accounted for 41%. This ratio has now been reversed. According to the International Monetary Fund's assessment, in 2018, developed economies made up 41% and developing economies made up 59% of total economic activity. After 500 years, due to major trends in global development, the worldwide expansion of Western civilization has reached a turning point. These same major trends have also determined the direction of global organization post-Cold War.

It's not easy to persuade certain Western theorists that they should fully accept this change. On the surface, the Cold War was a military confrontation, but at its heart, it was a political confrontation. Its ideology could not have ended merely because the enemy collapsed. French President Emmanuel Macron said that NATO is brain-dead, but that is only because having lost a military enemy, the world's largest military bloc's military brain started to fail. However, NATO’s political brain is still alive.

The feeling of victory that came at the end of the Cold War strengthened the West's drive to spread its values and systems, and and this extended the life of that political brain. The original ideology and the inertia of the system were also extended. While the form seems to have dissolved, the spirit is still alive. Even though reality has taught the West some painful lessons, it's still not enough to bring thorough change.

The thought patterns and logic of the Cold War developed over a long period of time. In essence, they are products of the expansion of Western civilization. Their greatest harm to the world is how they divide humanity's different value systems into a hierarchy of good and bad, and use this to create antagonism and division. What's more dangerous is that there are powerful countries that still use these divisions to determine their global strategy. Since they struggle to adapt to major trends in global development, they respond by trying to duplicate the environment of the Cold War. Particularly when faced with the abrupt rise of developing nations, which China represents, the West always rushes to raise the flags of the Cold War out of habit, longing to forge a new victory.

Some people intentionally search for new enemies, and they even manufacture imaginary foes and create a feeling of crisis in order to encourage staying alert and a feeling of cohesion. Some are holding on to the dated concept of proselytizing their views, stubbornly trying to have the whole world conform to their "universal" way of thinking. That Cold War-era mindset, which at a glance seems to have already disappeared, has in fact merely been temporarily suppressed. With only the slightest provocation, it will quickly emerge again like a demon being exorcised.

Billions of people rely on the Earth to live, and the huge changes brought by globalization prove that the time when two large military blocs made the world go round is gone. No one hopes for the reemergence of such a dangerous equilibrium. It didn't just cause the people living on either side of the Berlin Wall to live under constant threat; it even once dragged the world into a state of nuclear terror. As the West commemorates the 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, it should tear down the wall in its own heart. It should not let the zombies of the Cold War walk openly down the street, frightening those who live in peace.


社评:纪念柏林墙倒塌,西方应推倒心里的墙

三十年前的11月9日,柏林墙倒塌,两年后,苏联解体。今天重温历史,我们会想到什么?是当年西方的胜利狂欢为何会那么短暂,还是它对当下全球大变局的影响?

柏林墙倒塌被视为冷战结束的重要标志之一。西方一度因此呈现出一派历史终结的胜利感。但世界是变动不居的,“历史终结论”言犹在耳,失望与不安已像病毒一样在西方传播。尤其是2008年席卷全球的西方金融危机,从“堡垒内部”瓦解了士气。那些欢呼胜利的人开始用“衰退”“失败”来形容他们的金融体系。但他们不愿承认造成这一变局的正是西方体制的失灵。

全球经济版图的变化清晰地显示:1980年到2007年,发达经济体平均占据全球经济总量的59%(以购买力平价计算),而发展中经济体的比重总和为41%。这个比例已经发生逆转。根据国际货币基金组织的评估,2018年,发达经济体占41%,发展中经济体达到59%。500多年来西方文明的全球扩张进入了转折期。这是全球发展大趋势的结果,正是这个大趋势决定着冷战之后全球格局的走势。

让西方一些“理论大师”从根本上接受这一变化是不容易的。冷战表面上是一种军事对抗,实质上是政治对抗。它不可能因为敌对一方的解体而在思想上随之彻底结束。法国总统马克龙说北约已经“脑死亡”,那不过是因为在失去军事的敌人之后,世界上最大的武装集团的军事之“脑”开始衰竭,但政治之“脑”依然活着。

冷战结束的“胜利感”增强了西方价值观和体制扩张的冲动,延长了这个政治之脑的寿命。原有的思想、体制的惯性也因此而延续了一定的生命力。其形似散,其魂犹在。即使是现实给了他们一些惨痛教训,但尚不足以促成其彻底改变。

冷战的思维方式及其逻辑是长期形成的,其本身就是西方文明扩张的一个产物。它对这个世界最大的毒害就是将人类不同的价值观划分出优劣和等级,并借此制造对立和分裂。更危险的是,迄今仍有大国依据这种划分来确定其全球战略。它难以适应全球发展的大趋势,幻想着借助复制冷战的场景来应对。尤其是在面对以中国为代表的发展中国家的全面崛起时,总会急迫而习惯性地举起冷战的旗帜,并渴望成功地再造一个“胜利”。

有人在刻意寻找新对手甚至制造假想敌,制造危机感,以期能激励自身的警醒和凝聚力。有人死抱着向全球传播其价值观的旧观念,顽固地要将全球发展整合到其“普世”的轨道上。那些看上去已经消失的冷战思维,其实不过是暂时沉积在心底而已,稍有刺激,很快就会像中了“勾魂术”的邪一样,浮现出来。

全球化的巨变表明,几十亿人赖以生存的地球随两大军事集团转动的时代已经一去不复返。没有人希望危险的平衡重现。它不只是让柏林墙两边的人们都生活在威胁中,甚至曾将整个世界拖入了核恐怖。西方在纪念柏林墙倒塌30周年的时候,理应把自己心里的那堵墙推倒,不要让冷战的僵尸公然走到大街上去,惊扰和平的人们。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Australia Boosts Corporate Law Enforcement as America Goes Soft

Russia: Trump Names Man Fomenting Revolution in the U.S.*

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Topics

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Related Articles

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands

Zimbabwe: What the West Doesn’t Understand about China’s Growing Military Might

Sri Lanka: Trump Is Very Hard on India and Brazil, but For Very Different Reasons