The so-called new economy, based on the spectacular technological developments that have taken place over the past two decades due to globalization, remains unaccompanied by appropriate regulations, especially with regard to taxes. As a result, technology giants are taking advantage of current legal loopholes and complex tax engineering to pay much less in taxes than they should, as measured by their enormous profits. Part of this is caused by the use of tax havens, of course, but also by the Trump administration's support for these huge American tech companies, an unfair practice according to world trade rules. To date, the internet giants have paid $100 billion less than their share in taxes over the last decade.
It is urgent that we put an end to this scandalous situation once and for all. In the European Union, the lack of consensus is preventing progress in tax harmonization, which is greatly damaging many countries' public coffers. Hence, France has already unilaterally approved the Google tax, and in Spain, Pedro Sánchez has also backed it. In Google's case, the company is also continuing to abuse its domination of advertising, so Paris just imposed a fine of $168 million, adding to an endless string of sanctions in Europe. The internet cannot be a jungle ungoverned by the rules of competition.
Washington is no longer content with slow exhaustion; it has adopted a strategy of swift, symbolic strikes designed to recalibrate the international landscape.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.
From a European perspective, the U.S. government's reasoning seems rather absurd. ..[o]rganizations like HateAid do not oppose free speech — they protect it.
While European leaders want to preserve the American security umbrella without subscribing to Trump’s ideological project, he demands that they adhere to a MAGA-fied global order yet offers little in return.