It’s Not a Case of White or Black

Published in El Universal
(Venezuela) on 12 June 2020
by Jorge Sayegh (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Kaitlyn Diehl. Edited by .
Thousands of people across the U.S. forgot about the pandemic and turned out, crowded together (I hope virologists' predictions are wrong), in protest of the assassination of my namesake George Floyd. As a result, I've come across a rationale that attempts to undermine the anti-racist nature of these protests by alleging that the black community in the U.S. shows disproportionately higher rates of violence than others—which is true—and no one complains about it. Ergo, these protests are artificial and wrong because they don’t protest against the criminal violence of African Americans. I see two substantial problems in this argument, among others.

First, it is based upon a false dilemma. You can protest against endemic crime of African Americans, and you can also protest against racially motivated violence. Or only against one, or against the other. Or, if you want, you can protest police violence regardless of race because there are also white cops who rally against whites. But in this case, the protests are specifically intended for the problem of police practices that discriminate against people of color. If you wish to protest for another cause, perfect. Go and do it, but don't look down upon Black Lives Matter.

The second problem is to conveniently overlook the fact that if a community that represents 12% of the population commits more than 50% of the homicides, one must suspect that the established societal model prevents this group of people from harmoniously integrating themselves with fellow citizens. To negate the existence of racial prejudice would be pointless, and to use successful blacks like Barack Obama as examples is misleading because he is the exception, not the rule. The other option would be to believe that African Americans are more genetically predisposed to commit crime than citizens of other races. What do you think, dear reader?




Miles de personas a lo largo de EEUU se olvidaron de la pandemia y salieron a amuñuñarse (espero que los virólogos estén equivocados con sus predicciones) en protesta por el asesinato de mi tocayo Floyd. A raíz de esto me he topado con un razonamiento que pretende subestimar la naturaleza antiracista de estas manifestaciones alegando que la comunidad de negros en EEUU muestra índices de violencia desproporcionadamente más altos que las demás —cosa que es cierta— y nadie se queja de eso. Ergo, estas manifestaciones son artificiales y equivocadas porque no protestan en contra de la violencia delincuencial de los afroamericanos. Entre muchos, veo dos problemas sustanciales en esta argumentación.

El primero es que se trata de un falso dilema. Puedes protestar en contra de la delincuencia endémica de los afroamericanos y también puedes protestar por la violencia racista. O sólo por una. O por la otra. O si quieres podrías protestar por la violencia policial indistintamente de contra qué raza se aplique, porque hay tombos gringos que también arremeten contra blancos. Pero en este caso las manifestaciones son por el problema específico de las técnicas policiales discriminatorias contra los ciudadanos de color. Si tú quieres ir a protestar por otro motivo, perfecto, anda y hazlo, pero no ningunees a los Black Lives Matter.

El segundo problema es pasar olímpicamente por alto que si una comunidad que representa el 12% de la población comete más del 50% de los homicidios, hay que sospechar que el modelo de sociedad establecido le impide a este grupo humano incorporarse de manera armónica con el resto de sus conciudadanos. Negar que existen prejuicios raciales sería ocioso y utilizar como ejemplo a negros exitosos como Obama es engañoso, porque él es una excepción, no la regla. La otra opción sería creer que los afroamericanos son genéticamente más propensos a cometer crímenes que los ciudadanos de otras razas. ¿Usted qué cree, querido lector?
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: Big Tech and the Police State

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Topics

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Related Articles

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Venezuela: Geopolitics and Latin America

Venezuela: Oil Sanctions: Why the US Will Lose More Than Venezuela

Germany: Donald Trump’s Constant Lawbreaking: Destruction of Seemingly Strong Democracy

Venezuela: Ukraine: Weak Countries for Sale