America and Russia: Swords Drawn Over Belarus Unrest

Published in Nihon Keizai Shimbun (Nikkei)
(Japan) on 5 September 2020
by Motohiro Ikeda (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Eric Stimson. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
Russia and America have drawn swords over the former Soviet Republic of Belarus, where unrest continues in connection with a disputed presidential election. Increasingly distrustful of each other, Russia and America are holding back on intervening in the domestic affairs of Belarus. And as the end of Alexander Lukashenko’s long dictatorship comes into view, both America and Russia are quietly bolstering their offensive and defensive strategies.

“Compared to America or Europe, our position is far more moderate and neutral,” said Russian President Vladimir Putin. At the end of August, Putin touched on the unrest in Belarus for the first time in an interview on state TV, criticizing the West for its one-sided attack on the Lukashenko regime.

In the Belarusian presidential election held on Aug. 9, Lukashenko announced that he won his sixth election with 80% of the vote, but opposition forces and Belarusian citizens charged that the election was illegitimate. Huge protests and demonstrations took place, and there is a growing movement demanding that Lukashenko resign and that Belarus hold another election.

Russia claims that Lukashenko’s election was fair, but the West supports the citizens’ protest movement on every front, including the economic front. U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun met with Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, Belarus’ unified opposition candidate who faced Lukashenko in the election.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has determined that the election was “not free and fair,” and said that “[a]s friends of Belarus, we support Belarusian independence and sovereignty, as well as the aspirations of the Belarusian people for a democratic, prosperous future.”

Putin has revealed that at Lukashenko’s request, Russia is prepared to send a peacekeeping squad if the situation deteriorates. He says it will only be deployed under extreme circumstances such as looting, arson or the occupation of administrative institutions, but the West has grown increasingly suspicious. When Biegun visited Russia in late August for talks with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, he warned that America would sanction Russia if it intervened militarily in Belarus. The West’s mistrust of Russia is all the more intense in the wake of Russia’s military intervention during the Ukraine crisis of 2014.

An event took place in Belarus at the end of July which symbolized the deep-rooted conflict between Russia and the United States. More than 30 Russian fighters from the private Russian military company Wagner were detained in the Belarusian capital of Minsk, and elsewhere.

Russia explained that the soldiers were heading to another country, but Belarusian authorities alleged the soldiers were planning “planning riots and acts of terror.” Lukashenko also criticized Russia for “plotting to destabilize the domestic situation ahead of the presidential election.” He thinks that deploying the soldiers was meant to fan anti-government demonstrations and block his reelection.

The Russian tabloid Komsomolskaya Pravda reported that according to Russian authorities, the fighters were Ukrainian special forces sent to sow discord between Russia and Belarus. The newspaper claimed that Russian fighters were allegedly summoned to guard oil installations in the Middle East and Latin America.

The Ukrainian government dismissed this as “fake news,” but the Ukrainian media have reported on possible involvement by Ukraine’s security service and its defense ministry information office. The media reported on conspiracy theories involving America and Ukraine in an operation aimed at arresting soldiers who had participated on behalf of Russia in the conflict in eastern Ukraine.

In reality, although Ukraine asked that the soldiers be handed over, the soldiers were repatriated to Russia. It might have seemed that the incident was over, but Putin brought it up at the aforementioned press conference on state TV, saying, “it was a coordinated operation by American and Ukrainian special forces.”

Whatever the truth is, it is apparent that Russia is somehow warning America against interfering. Ukraine, a former Soviet republic, underwent a popular democratic uprising known as the Orange Revolution in 2004, and in 2014, a pro-Russian government was toppled by a citizens’ protest movement. To Russia, it seems that America is somehow surreptitiously manipulating this, and Russia appears to be firmly determined to stop this in Belarus.

Belarus is a member of the Eurasian Economic Union led by Russia, and with regard to the economic sector, it has signed the Treaty on the Creation of a Union State, which aims to create a unified market, among other things. Belarus, which borders Poland, Lithuania and Latvia to the west, is also important to Russia’s defense strategy in guarding against incursions by NATO.

However, there is doubt even among Russian experts about Lukashenko’s ability to maintain his long-term hold on the presidency. As Russia expels Western influence, it appears to be carefully steering a future transition in government.


大統領選の不正疑惑で混乱が続く旧ソ連のベラルーシを巡り、ロシアと米国がつばぜり合いを演じている。相互不信を強める米ロはともに「内政干渉」をけん制。長期独裁体制を続けるルカシェンコ大統領の早晩の退陣も見据え、水面下で攻防を強めている。

「我々の立場は欧州や米国などよりも、はるかに控えめで中立的だ」。ロシアのプーチン大統領は8月末、国営テレビのインタビューでベラルーシの騒乱に初めて触れ、ルカシェンコ政権を一方的に非難する米欧の姿勢を問題視した。

8月9日に実施されたベラルーシ大統領選は、ルカシェンコ氏が8割の得票で6選を決めたと発表されたが、反体制派や市民らは「不正選挙」と反発。大規模な抗議集会やデモを展開し、同氏の退陣や再選挙を求める動きが広がっている。

ロシアは同氏の当選を「正当」と主張するが、米欧は市民らの抗議活動を全面的に擁護し、資金面を含めて支援する。米国のビーガン国務副長官は選挙戦でルカシェンコ氏に対抗した反体制派の統一候補チハノフスカヤ氏と会談した。

ポンペオ国務長官は選挙が「自由でも公平でもなかった」と断じるとともに「友人としてベラルーシの独立と主権、民主的で繁栄した未来を望む人々の願いを支援する」と表明した。

プーチン氏はルカシェンコ氏の要請で、情勢悪化に備えた治安部隊の派遣をロシアが準備したと明かしている。あくまでも略奪や放火、行政機関の占拠といった非常時に限って投入するというが、米欧の疑心は募る。ビーガン副長官は8月下旬の訪ロ時にラブロフ外相と会談した際、ロシアがベラルーシに軍事介入すれば、米国は対ロ制裁を科すと警告したという。ロシアは2014年のウクライナ危機で軍事介入した経緯があり、米欧の対ロ不信はなおさらだ。

ベラルーシでは、根深い米ロ対立を象徴するような出来事が7月末に起きた。ロシアの民間軍事会社「ワグネル」に所属する30人以上のロシア人戦闘員が首都ミンスクなどで拘束された事件だ。

ロシアは第三国に向かう途中だったと説明したが、ベラルーシ当局は「騒乱・テロ行為を企てていた」と発表。ルカシェンコ氏も「大統領選を前に、国内情勢を不安定化させる試みだ」とロシアを非難した。戦闘員の投入で反政権デモをあおり、自身の6選阻止をもくろんだとみたわけだ。

だがロシア大衆紙コムソモリスカヤ・プラウダはロシア当局の情報として、ロシアとベラルーシを仲たがいさせるために、ウクライナ特殊機関が仕掛けたものだと報じた。中東や中南米での石油施設の保安業務という仕事をエサにロシア人戦闘員を呼び寄せたという。

ウクライナ政府は「偽情報」と否定したが、同国メディアなどもウクライナの保安庁と国防省情報総局の関与説を指摘。米国とウクライナの共謀説、ウクライナ東部紛争で親ロシア派に加担した戦闘員の逮捕を狙ったという説も報じられた。

ウクライナは実際、戦闘員の引き渡しを求めたものの、ロシアに送還された。事件は決着したかにみえたが、プーチン氏は先の国営テレビの会見で「米国とウクライナの特殊機関による共同作戦だ」と蒸し返したのだ。

真相はともかく、ロシアが米国の干渉をいかに警戒しているかがうかがえる。同じ旧ソ連のウクライナでは04年にオレンジ革命と呼ばれる民主化運動が起き、14年には市民の抗議行動で親ロ派政権が倒された。いずれも米国が水面下で主導したとロシアはみており、ベラルーシでは断固阻止する構えのようだ。

ベラルーシはロシアが主導するユーラシア経済同盟に参加し、経済面での単一市場などを目指す「連合国家創設条約」も結んでいる。西側でポーランド、リトアニア、ラトビアと国境を接するベラルーシは北大西洋条約機構(NATO)の浸透を防ぐロシアの安全保障戦略の上でも重要だ。

ただし、ルカシェンコ氏の去就を巡ってはロシア専門家の間でも長期の政権維持に懐疑的な見方が出ている。ロシアは米欧の影響力を排除しつつ、将来の政権移行も見据えたかじ取りを慎重に進めていくとみられる。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Topics

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Related Articles

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang