Trump Secures the Supreme Court

Published in El Periódico
(Spain) on 27 September 2020
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Marta Quirós Alarcón. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
The president is willing to do literally anything to legally challenge the presidential election if the results are unfavorable to him on Nov. 3.

Donald Trump’s decision to nominate Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a representative of Catholic fundamentalism, to succeed the progressive Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court is not surprising. Rather, it confirms that the president is willing to do literally anything to legally challenge the presidential election if the results are unfavorable to him on Nov. 3. If the Senate confirms the nomination and a 6-3 conservative majority in the court becomes a reality, Trump will ostensibly have one last tactic — using a string of resources — to obtain from the justices what voters may deny him.

The White House has ignored the advice of traditional Republican thinking to offer the position to Barbara Lagoa, a conservative but not a regressive judge, and has dismissed the possibility of leaving Ginsburg’s replacement up to the winner in November because he intends to use Barrett’s nomination to mobilize extremist voters. The campaign has thus become tense beyond measure, once again transforming the Republican Party into a puppet in Trump’s hands, which is cause for alarm even among some of his supporters.


Trump se asegura el Supremo

El mandatario está dispuesto a hacer literalmente lo que sea para judicializar la elección presidencial si las urnas le son adversas el 3 de noviembre

La decisión de Donald Trump de proponer al Senado a la jueza Amy Coney Barret, una figura del integrismo católico, para suceder a la progresista Ruth Ginsburg en el Tribunal Supremo no constituye ninguna sorpresa, sino más bien la confirmación de que el presidente está dispuesto a hacer literalmente lo que sea para judicializar la elección presidencial si las urnas le son adversas el 3 de noviembre. Si el Senado aprueba el nombramiento y se hace realidad una mayoría conservadora de seis a tres en el tribunal, Trump dispondrá teóricamente de un último atajo para, mediante el encadenamiento de recursos, lograr de los jueces lo que le hayan podido negar los electores.

La Casa Blanca ha desoído el consejo del republicanismo clásico de ofrecer el cargo a Barbara Lagoa, conservadora, pero no retardataria, y ha descartado la posibilidad de dejar la sucesión de Ginsburg en manos del vencedor de noviembre porque, además, piensa usar el nombramiento de Barret como un factor de movilización del electorado ultra. La campaña se enrarece así más allá de toda medida y convierte una vez más al Partido Republicano en un muñeco en manos de Trump, algo que alarma incluso a parte de sus votantes.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Thailand: Southeast Asia Amid the US-China Rift

Topics

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Related Articles

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge