The US May Set the Pace, but China Will Not Be Passive

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 6 April 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Brittany Bradley . Edited by Michelle Bisson.
On April 4, German Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer reiterated that in August, Germany will deploy a warship to the South China Sea to declare freedom of navigation. She stated that China intends to create its own world order, and that the Western world should not be coerced into following along. Japanese media quoted sources stating that Japan and Germany will hold a two-plus-two video conference in April. Additionally, the U.S., Japan, India and Australia have already begun joint military exercises in the Bay of Bengal on April 5, which will last three days.

The U.S.-led four-country partnership is trending toward the direction of a four-party-plus alliance, with Europe being the extra force Washington and Japan both want to add to the equation. It seems they have made some progress, at least where creating momentum by strengthening ties is concerned.

The Joe Biden administration's idea of strengthening its alliances by working together with other nations is an act of pandering to the Western world's unease about the challenge of the sudden rise of China. It is a move that carries some level of provocation. Some European countries are committed to the European Union’s strategic autonomy, not just to compete with the U.S., but also in the hopes of increasing their visibility and establishing a presence in China. Under the impetus of the U.S., the tricks and ploys against China from these various countries as well as the EU will start to increase.

The U.S. is the only protagonist in this major political game against China, but the nature and trend of it all is still uncertain. The most extreme politicians within the U.S. hope to start another Cold War, and so far there has been adequate political mobilization to do so. The conflict between the U.S. and China already bears some resemblance to a new Cold War. However, the allies the U.S. wish to pull together for support are still fragmented, and the U.S.’s goal of cutting economic ties and confronting China is still far out of reach.

China faces an unprecedented challenge in this strategic political game. It must fight firmly against Washington’s suppression and guard itself against the allies who assist the U.S. in carrying out anti-China policies. We must employ tit-for-tat measures when our core interests are being violated. At the same time, China must also be active in taking appropriate measures, whose effectiveness prioritizes our long-term goals, and avoid conflict that would be conducive to furthering Washington’s extensive mobilization in the West. China must prevent extremist politicians within the U.S. from controlling the situation so as not to play into their hands.

Political conflict between China and the U.S., even China and the West, is inevitable and both sides will gradually adapt to this kind of conflict. A future pluralistic world will not happen by accident, but will only be the result of struggle. China, of course, must adhere to its own political system and national path. No one can deprive us of this right.

At the same time China must take the initiative to ease the impact of political and security issues on the economy. China’s security challenges are mainly located in its immediate surroundings, but it is overall the strongest country in the entire region. Despite disruption from the U.S., it has a considerable amount of power that would allow it to actively face these security issues.

China has a particularly strong economy that continues to grow and is more proactive in easing the economic impact of political and security issues. In other words, as long as China opposes the dividing and decoupling of the world economy, the new Cold War agitators in the U.S. are unlikely to accomplish their goal.

It is critical that the people of China trust in the power of strategy. We must believe that no one can overpower us militarily, and that no matter how the U.S. chooses to strengthen its alliances, it will not be able to form another Eight Nation Alliance. It can only show off its power through the use of military exercises and declarations of freedom of navigation. One of its objectives is to consolidate the confidence of its allies, and strive for more strategic space in order to exert pressure on China.

We must also believe that China is strong enough to deal with any current and future complications. As long as we remain organized, the actual harm caused by various disturbances will be limited. China's greatest advantage is its ability to develop itself, and this strength will continue to provide China with all the necessary resources required to play out this political game.

At the same time, we must believe that ultimately facts speak louder than rhetoric. Although the public opinion of China in the U.S. and other Western nations is extremely poor, and they continue to endlessly slander and discredit us, as long as China continues to refrain from engaging in external geopolitical expansion or instigating conflict, and demonstrates a long-term commitment to equal and mutually beneficial cooperation between nations, most countries in the world, including many Western countries, will observe and come to understand. In the future, there will be various things that require China’s cooperation. The West’s acknowledgement of China cannot be blocked by the iron curtain of U.S.-led ideology.

In short, we cannot allow the U.S. to do as it wishes and drive the international situation in the direction of conflict. We must instead use whatever leverage and resources are at our disposal to unleash the diversity of the world. Because China is big, and will continue to get even bigger, it is possible for us to move the rhythm in a new direction.

We need both the will and ability to counter provocations, as well as the wisdom to prevent political disputes and general conflicts from evolving into strategic confrontations. The abundant political ideology passed down throughout history and the strong cohesiveness of its political system will help China withstand this unprecedented test.


德国国防部长卡伦鲍尔4日重申,德国将在8月份派一艘军舰前往南海宣示航行自由,并称中国想要按自己的蓝图打造世界秩序,西方世界不应受中国逼迫。日本媒体援引消息人士的话说,日德将在4月份举行视频“2+2”会晤,另外法国与美日印澳在孟加拉湾的联合军演已于5日开始,为期三天。

美国主导的四方机制正朝着“四方+”的方向发酵,华盛顿和日本最想加上的额外力量就是欧洲国家。看来至少在通过加强联络制造声势方面,他们取得了一定进展。

拜登政府通过强化盟友体系共同应对中国挑战的主张迎合了西方世界对中国崛起的不安情绪,有一定的鼓动性。一些欧洲国家致力于欧盟的战略自主,不光针对美国,也希望在中国方向刷存在感,提高能见度。在美国的推动下,那些国家和欧盟针对中国的各种作秀将呈增多之势。

美国是这场对华大博弈的唯一主角,但是这场博弈的性质和走势仍有不确定性。美国最极端的精英们希望将之搞成新冷战,到目前为止政治层面的动员已经开展得相当充分,中美的政治冲突氛围也有那么点像“新冷战”了,但是美国想拉的安全阵营仍是碎片化的,经济脱钩和对抗的目标则遥不可及。

中国面临前所未有的战略博弈考验,我们需要坚决反击华盛顿的打压,不纵容其盟友对美国反华政策的配合协助,我们要在核心利益遭到触犯时采取针锋相对的措施。同时我们也要主动把控好时度效,避免形成可能有利于华盛顿在西方进一步开展广泛动员的冲突焦点,防止事态的发展被美国极端精英牵制,不断滑向他们的预设战场。

中美乃至中西的政治摩擦无可避免,慢慢地双方会产生对这类摩擦的适应性,未来的世界多元不会是上苍的安排,只能是斗争的结果。中国当然要坚持自己的政治制度和国家道路,我们的这一权利谁都休想剥夺。

同时要防止政治问题的不断安全化,尤其不能让它朝经济领域渗透蔓延。由于中国的安全挑战主要在周边,我们又是整个地区综合实力最强的国家,尽管有美国搅动,我们有相当大的控制安全问题无限发酵的主动权。

中国的经济实力尤其强大,而且在继续发展。缓释政治和安全问题对经济的冲击,中国的主动性更强。换句话说,只要中国反对世界经济分裂、脱钩,美国的新冷战鼓动者就不太可能办成这件事。

中国人的战略自信将很关键。我们要相信没有人能够以军事方式压倒中国,美国无论怎样强化盟友体系,他们也搞不成新的“八国联军”。他们只能通过军演、宣示“航行自由”等逞强,其真实目的之一是要巩固盟友对美国的信心,为美国争取更大向中国施压的战略空间。

我们还要相信,中国的实力足以应对当前和今后的复杂局面,只要我们自己不乱,各种外部骚扰对中国的实际伤害都将是有限的。中国的最大优势是自我发展能力,它的强劲将不断赋予中国各种需要的战略博弈资源。

我们同时要相信事实胜于雄辩这一终极规律。虽然美西方的舆论对华极不友好,对我各种污蔑、抹黑层出不穷,但只要中国坚持不搞对外地缘政治扩张,不主动挑起冲突,长期致力于平等互利合作,世界大多数国家、包括很多西方国家是能够观察得到、体会得出来的。未来世界上会发生各种事情需要中国参与合作,西方对中国的认知不可能被美国主导的意识形态铁幕封锁得密不透风。

总之我们不能让美国肆无忌惮地带国际局势沿冲突方向演变的节奏,而要用我们手中所拥有的资源和杠杆真正释放这个世界的多元性,因为中国很“大”,而且在继续“变大”,我们是有可能朝另一方向带出节奏的。

我们需要有反制挑衅的意志和能力,有不让政治纷争和一般性冲突演变成战略对抗的胸怀和智慧,中国来源于历史深处的丰富思想资源和政治体制赋予我们的强大凝聚力将帮助我们经受住这场空前的考验。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Horror Show in Oval Office at Meeting of Merz and Trump

Spain: Trump to Students — ‘Don’t Come’

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Hong Kong: From Harvard to West Point — The Underlying Logic of Trump’s Regulation of University Education

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Topics

Germany: Horror Show in Oval Office at Meeting of Merz and Trump

Hong Kong: From Harvard to West Point — The Underlying Logic of Trump’s Regulation of University Education

Spain: Trump to Students — ‘Don’t Come’

Japan: Will the Pressure on Harvard University Affect Overseas Students?

Mexico: From Star Wars to Golden Domes

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Austria: Whether or Not the Tariffs Are Here to Stay, the Damage Has Already Been Done*

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Related Articles

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Australia: The US’s Biggest Export? Trump’s MAGA Mindset

Australia: Trump Misfires Again in His War on the World

Poland: Trump Sets up Power Directorate: Brussels No Longer Rules Europe