US Policy on North Korea: Continued Pressure for Total Denuclearization Is Needed

Published in The Sankei News
(Japan) on 13 May 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by D Baker. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
Joe Biden’s administration has set out a new North Korea policy at a meeting of foreign ministers hosted by the Group of Seven major industrial nations.

While the details remain unclear, it is said to be “a calibrated practical approach,” and marks a divergence from the Donald Trump administration's aim of a “package deal” between the two leaders and the Barack Obama administration's reliance on “strategic patience.” Instead, it seems to envisage reaching agreements incrementally through diplomatic discussions.

Those discussions should push for complete denuclearization, whatever form they will take. Threats to peace must be eliminated.

What is required of North Korea is the disposal of all weapons of mass destruction, including biological and chemical weapons, as well as ballistic missiles, which act as the means of delivery. It is not just the intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching the United States that should be disposed of, but also their medium- and short-range missiles.

Trump called for complete and immediate denuclearization of North Korea in talks between the two leaders only for his “deal” to fall flat. It must be noted that it was the U.S. strategy of “maximum pressure,” exerted on both military and economic fronts, which coaxed Kim Jong Un to those talks.

The sanctions on North Korea set out in a U.N. Security Council resolution were a key part of that pressure. Strict adherence to sanctions should be a prerequisite for the discussions, and this adherence should continue to be closely monitored at all times.

The primary objective of the Security Council resolution was to sever the flow of funds and materials required by North Korea for the development of nuclear missiles. It is essential to stay on the lookout for the illegal acquisition of foreign currencies through cyberattacks and other methods to ensure that this resolution is effective.

We must not forget that after the Agreed Framework between the United States of America and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea in 1994 and an agreement at the six-party talks in 2005, North Korea broke various promises, such as a freeze on nuclear weapons, obtained heavy crude oil and food supplies and managed to achieve an alleviation of U.S. economic sanctions, as well as the removal of its designation as a state sponsor of terrorism. North Korea's lies cannot be tolerated any further.

One concern about the intensifying standoff between the United States and China is that China will increase its support for its fellow “autocratic” state, North Korea. There are also reports of the intention to open the China-North Korea border, closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The onus is on China to behave responsibly as a permanent member of the Security Council.

At the Japan-U.S. foreign ministers' meeting held during the G-7 event, Minister for Foreign Affairs Toshimitsu Motegi welcomed and expressed support for America's policy on North Korea. Coordinated efforts between the U.S. and Japan will also be essential in addressing the North Korean abductions of Japanese citizens, an issue which is very important to Japan.


【主張】米の北朝鮮政策 完全非核化へ圧力継続を

バイデン米政権が新たな北朝鮮政策をまとめ、先進7カ国(G7)外相会合などで説明した。
 中身は明らかにされていないが、「調整された現実的な取り組み」であり、トランプ政権のように首脳間の「一括取引」を目指すものではなく、オバマ政権のように「戦略的忍耐」に依存するものでもないという。外交交渉を通じ、段階的な合意を積み上げることが想定されているようだ。
 どのような形で交渉を進めようともあくまで「完全な非核化」を追求してもらいたい。平和への脅威を排除しなければならない。
 北朝鮮に求められるのは生物、化学兵器を含む全ての大量破壊兵器と、その運搬手段である弾道ミサイルの廃棄だ。米国に届く大陸間弾道ミサイル(ICBM)のみならず、中・短距離ミサイルも廃棄の対象として見過ごせない。
 トランプ前大統領は即時の完全な非核化を求め、首脳会談に踏み切ったが、「取引」は失敗した。ただ、米国などの軍事、経済両面での「最大限の圧力」が金正恩総書記を首脳会談へと引き出したことには留意せねばならない。
 国連安全保障理事会の決議が定めた北朝鮮制裁はその柱である。交渉にあたっては、制裁決議の厳格履行が大前提であり、履行状況を常に厳しく監視すべきだ。
 安保理決議は、北朝鮮の核・ミサイル開発に必要な資金や物資の流入を断つのが第一の目的だ。実効性を確保するためにはサイバー攻撃などによる不法な外貨獲得にも目を光らせる必要がある。
 北朝鮮が1994年の米朝枠組み合意や2005年の6カ国協議での合意の後、核開発凍結などの約束を破り、重油や食糧を手に入れ、米国の金融制裁緩和やテロ支援国家指定解除をもぎとったことも忘れてはならない。これ以上、嘘を許すわけにはいかない。
 気がかりなのは、米中対立が深まる中で、中国が同じ「専制主義国家」である北朝鮮への肩入れを強めることだ。新型コロナウイルスの流行で閉ざされていた中朝国境の再開の動きも伝えられる。中国には安保理常任理事国として、責任ある振る舞いを求めたい。
 G7外相会合の機会に開催された日米外相会談で、茂木敏充外相は、米国の北朝鮮政策に支持と歓迎を表明した。日本にとって重要な拉致問題の解決に向けても日米の一致協力が不可欠である。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Ireland: Irish Examiner View: Would We Miss Donald Trump and Would a Successor Be Worse?

Turkey: Pay Up or Step Aside: Tariffs in America’s ‘Protection Money’ Diplomacy

Australia: Donald Trump Is Taking Over the US Federal Reserve and Financial Markets Have Missed the Point

Canada: Minnesota School Shooting Is Just More Proof That America Is Crazed

Topics

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Related Articles

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Turkey: Pay Up or Step Aside: Tariffs in America’s ‘Protection Money’ Diplomacy

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands

Zimbabwe: What the West Doesn’t Understand about China’s Growing Military Might