US Military, Don’t Drain Polluted Water into the Ocean

Published in Ryukyu Shimpo
(Japan) on 10 July 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dani Long. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
The U.S. military at Marine Corps Air Station Futenma is investigating methods to dispose of an organic fluorine compound, PFAS,* a liquid substance known to be hazardous, into the surrounding area.

Naturally, Denny Tamaki, governor of the Okinawa prefecture, says he “absolutely does not approve.” Even if in small quantities, “contaminated water” will not be permitted to pour into the sea of the citizens’ prefecture.

The U.S. military should investigate disposal methods at its own risk. Any method that would bring harm to the health of citizens will never be deemed acceptable.

PFAS are seen as a problem because of possible negative effects on living organisms, such as cancer and low birth weight. Moreover, they are referred to as “forever chemicals” because they hardly decompose at all in nature. PFAS are also known to accumulate in the bodies of living things, including humans.

Last April, a fire extinguisher foam containing PFAS was leaked from Futenma. Among the PFAS, highly toxic PFOS* and PFOA* (substances that fall under the PFAS category) were detected in the rivers in the city of Ginowan. In June, contaminated water containing PFOS leaked from the U.S. military’s oil storage facility in the city of Uruma.

These are serious accidents that affect the health of citizens in the prefecture. However, it cannot be said that the U.S. military actively disclosed relevant details. The Okinawa Prefecture launched an investigation into these two accidents, but both were only allowed through negotiations with the United States.

The United States military has explained that after contaminated water containing PFAS is treated, it is released via “through the public wastewater system” and “is fully compliant with Japanese drinking water guidelines.”

However, research regarding PFAS is ongoing and every nation has different standards. In Japan, the provisional guideline values of PFOS and PFOA are 50 nanograms (1.76 ounces) per liter (33.8 ounces). In comparison, the guideline value set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is 70 nanograms per liter. The state of California has established still stricter standards of PFOS at 6.5 nanograms and PFOA at 5.1 nanograms.

In a situation in which accurate information cannot be obtained from the U.S. military, claims that disposal “is fully compliant with Japanese drinking water guidelines” cannot be clearly confirmed.

President Joe Biden added PFAS as a “toxic substance” to Superfund law** regulations, which require the person responsible for a contamination incident to bear the expense of cleanup. With regard to the tightening of regulations, it is only appropriate that the U.S. military, the source of the pollution, take the waste back to the U.S. and deal with it at their own risk.

An investigation by the German Environment Agency found that of the 1,109 children between the ages of 3 and 17 that were examined, PFOA was detected in 86% of them. The cause is the consumption of fish that accumulated PFOA drained into the sea through the sewage disposal system.

American fast-food giant McDonald’s has announced that they will phase out PFAS used in packaging by 2025.

Essentially, chemical substances that are cannot be ingested by humans should not flow into the sea to accumulate in people’s bodies through [ingesting] wildlife. The Japanese government should monitor the disposal methods rigorously so that new harm does not come from the military base.

*Editor’s note: PFAS is an abbreviation for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, a group of synthetic, potentially harmful chemicals used in household products and industrial processes. Two kinds of PFAS are PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluorooctanesulfonic acid).

**Editor’s note: The Superfund law refers to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980.


有害性が指摘される有機フッ素化合物(PFAS)を含む液体を、米軍が普天間飛行場から基地外に放出する処分方法を検討している。

 玉城デニー知事が「絶対に認めない」と言うのは当然だ。微量であっても有害物質を含む「汚染水」が県民の海に流れ込むことは許されない。
 米軍は自らの責任でもって処分方法を検討すべきだ。県民の健康に害が及ぶような手法は決して認められない。
 PFASが問題視されるのは、発がん性や出生時の体重に影響が生じる可能性など生き物への悪影響があるからだ。しかも自然の中でほとんど分解されず「永遠の化学物質」と称される。人をはじめ生き物の体内に蓄積することも分かっている。
 県内では昨年4月に米軍普天間飛行場から泡消火剤が流出し、PFASの中でも毒性が強いとされるPFOSやPFOAが宜野湾市内の河川で検出された。
 6月にはうるま市の米軍貯油施設からPFOSを含む汚染水が流出した。
 県民の健康に関わる重大事故だ。しかし米軍が積極的に詳細に関する情報を開示したとはいえない。二つの事故で県の立ち入り調査は実現したが、共に日米協議を経て認められた。県民の安全より米軍の基地管理権が優先される現状に県民は納得していない。
 米軍はPFASを含む「汚染水」を、処理した上で「公共下水施設を通じて放出」「日本の飲料基準に完全に準拠している」と説明している。
 だがPFASに関しては、研究自体が発展途上にあり、世界各国で基準が異なる。日本ではPFOS、PFOAの暫定指針値が1リットル当たり50ナノグラムなのに対し、米連邦環境保護庁は同70ナノグラムとしている。
 ところが米カリフォルニア州はPFOS6・5ナノグラム、PFOA5・1ナノグラムなど、より厳しい基準を設けている。
 米軍から正確な情報が得られない状態で「基準に完全に準拠」したことが確認できるのか不透明だ。
 バイデン米大統領は、汚染発生の責任者に浄化費用の負担などを求めたスーパーファンド法の規制対象に「有害物質」としてPFASを追加した。規制強化の流れから言えば、汚染源である米軍が自らの責任の下、本国に持ち帰って対処するのは当然である。
 ドイツ連邦環境庁の調査では、3歳から17歳の子ども1109人のうち、86%からPFOAが検出されたという。
 排水処理を介してPFOAが海に流出し、蓄積した魚類を食べたことが原因だ。
 米ファストフード大手のマクドナルドは2025年までに包装紙や容器からPFASを全廃すると表明した。
 本来、人の口に入るはずのない化学物質が海に流れ、魚などを通して人々の体に蓄積される事態を招いてはならない。新たな基地被害を生まないよう日米政府は米軍の処理方法を厳重に監視すべきだ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Poland: Ukraine Is Still Far from Peace. What Was Actually Decided at the White House?

Australia: Donald Trump Is Taking Over the US Federal Reserve and Financial Markets Have Missed the Point

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Topics

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Related Articles

Nigeria: 80 Years after Hiroshima, Nagasaki Atomic Bombings: Any Lesson?

Taiwan: Trump’s Japan Negotiation Strategy: Implications for Taiwan

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Japan: Iran Ceasefire Agreement: The Danger of Peace by Force

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far