Did America Lose the War in Afghanistan?

Published in Sot al-Iraq
(Iraq) on 13 July 2021
by Dr. Abdelhamid al-Abbasi (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Meaghan DeWaters. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
A war is won if the desired objective, either to ignite a war or enter into one, is achieved. Completely defeating the opponent is not one of the main goals, although defeat may be a means or way of achieving a war’s objectives, rather than a condition for victory.

What were America’s objectives in the Afghanistan war? (1) That Afghanistan would not be hostile to America; (2) that Afghanistan would not become home to groups like the Islamic State or al-Qaida, which would use the country to launch hostile attacks against America or American interests or allies; (3) that Afghanistan would not be an area of influence for America’s opponents such as Russia, Iran, China or other similar countries, and (4) that there might be agreements, deals, or other pacts if America achieved its objectives.

America has won the war, and yet the Taliban have not lost. Foreign forces have left Afghanistan and the Taliban have taken power. This is how things look now, though it cannot be ruled out that America might have played a facilitating role in how quickly the Taliban overran vast areas of the country recently. Some people say the Americans ran away, leaving their weapons behind. Fleeing and abandoning weapons to enemies -- a disgrace beyond all disgraces in military tradition. Is this what happened?

First, there was no flight, but rather an organized, scheduled and deliberate withdrawal.

Second, during the honeymoon period after the agreement, no one expected the Taliban would use these weapons against America, although they could be used against those who opposed the agreement, which is in America’s interest.

Third, after a period of time, new weapons that do not yet exist will be designed and developed. The weapons left behind by the Americans will lose their advantage, and the Taliban will need to buy spare parts from the Americans for exorbitant prices and under strict conditions. Needless to say, these weapons will be a burden to whomever is left with them, just as it was with weapons left behind in Vietnam.

In light of this, America did not lose the war in Afghanistan, but rather won it. Or is Saddam Hussein’s saying that he “won” the war with Iran inaccurate, unless he wanted to remain in this position forever? Saddam did not achieve his principal goal, which was to recover Shatt al-Arab, by starting the war to become the first Arab to regain what he had lost. Anwar Sadat did not regain Sinai, but instead traded it in exchange for Israel's relinguishing of Syria, Lebanon and Palestine.


*هل خسرت أمريكا الحرب في أفغانستان*

د. عبدالحميد العباسي

هل خسرت أمريكا الحرب في أفغانستان: تكسب الحرب اذا تحققت الأهداف المرجوة من اشعالها او دخولها وليس من الأهداف الرئيسة الحاق الهزيمة بالخصم على ان هذا قد يكون من الوسائل او التداعيات وليس شرطا لتحقيق الاهداف. فماذا كانت اهداف أمريكا من تلك الحرب؟ (1) الا تكون أفغانستان دولة معادية لأمريكا. (3) الا تكون أفغانستان موطنا لفئات (داعش والقاعدة وما شاكل)تشن اعمال عدائي لامريكا, مصالحها او حلفائها. (3) لا تكون أفغانستان ساحة نفود لخصوم أمريكا (روسيا وايران والصين وما شاكل). (4). قد تكون هناك اتفاقات, تفاهمات, أو صفقات أُخر فاذا تحققت اهداف أمريكا تلك تكون أمريكا قد كسبت الخرب ولم تخسرها طالبان. لم تخسر طالبان الحرب فقد خرجت (أخرجت) القوات الأجنبية من أفغانستان واستلمت هي (طالبان ) السلطة , هكذا تبدو الأمور ولا يستبعد ان كان لامريكا دور *مُسهِل* لاجتياح مساحات شاسعة من البلاد مؤخرا . ومن الناس من يقول ان الامريكان هربوا تاركين سلاحهم إإ . أن تهرب وتترك سلاحك للخصم عار ما بعده عار في العرف العسكري, فهل هذا هو ما حصل؟ أولا: لم يكن هناك هروب بل انسحاب منظم مجدول ومدروس. ثانيا: في فترة ^العسل* بعد الاتفاق لا يتوقع استعمال هذا السلاح من قبل طالبان ضد أمريكا وقد يستعمل ضد معارضي الاتفاق وهذا سيصب في مصلحة أمريكا. ثالثا:: بعد فترة ستصمم وتطور اسلحة جديدة ان لم تكن موجودة الان وتفقد الاسلحة التي تركها الامريكان تفقد ميزتها وستحتاج طالبان لها قطع غيار تشتريها من أمريكا بأسعار باهظة وشروط. الخلاصة ان هذه الأسلحة ستكون عبئاً على من تركت معه كما كان الحال في الأسلحة التي تركت في *فيتنام*. وعلى ضوء ما اسلفت لا تكون أمريكا قد خسرت الحرب في افغانستان بل ربحتها. ام قول صدام انه ربح الحرب مع ايران فهو غير دقيق الل الا اذا أراد انه بقي في منصبه بعد انتهاء العرب , فهو لم يحقق هدفه الرئيس من اشعال الحرب وهو استرداد شط العرب فيكون اول عربي يسترد ما خسر. السادات لم يسترد سيناء بل قايضها بإطلاق يد إسرائيل في سوريا ولبنان وفلسطين
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

India: Tariffs, Turmoil and the Midterms: Beginning of the End of the Trump Era

Austria: Rubio’s Trip to Central and Eastern Europe Was More Than Mere Anti-EU Symbolism

Ireland: The Irish Times View on War in the Middle East: the Conflict Widens

Egypt: Era of the Psychopathic Maniac

Topics

Bolivia: Has There Been a Change in World Order?

Taiwan: Trump To Continue Fight Despite Unfavorable Supreme Court Ruling

Lebanon: From Venezuela to Iran: US Move To Contain China and Control Resources

Australia: By Striking Gulf States Iran Is Hitting 1 of Donald Trump’s Vulnerabilities

Australia: Why Iran’s Most Powerful Ally Is Not Coming to Its Aid

Canada: We Can Dislike Trump, but That Shouldn’t Define Us

Poland: Donald Trump’s State of the Union Address: How the US President Strayed from the Truth

Related Articles

Austria: The Tariff Ruling Impacts Several Pillars of Trump’s Political Agenda

Taiwan: US Pushing of ‘Venezuela Model’ Will Invite Inevitable Backlash

Iraq: From Noriega to Maduro: The Logic of Force in US Policy

Cuba: Are Our Days Numbered?

Philippines: Human Rights Watch 2025 vs Donald Trump