After a series of disastrous and tragic days due to attacks by terrorist groups around the Kabul airport, U.S. President Joe Biden announced the end of the evacuation of Americans and allies from Afghanistan, marking the end of the longest intervention in U.S. history.
Biden faced harsh criticism for the decision from the Republican, conservative opposition, but also on the pages and screens of mainstream media. Polls show a drop in his approval rating after the events in Kabul.
However, that drop may not fall any lower in the coming weeks. For some years now, American society has not had much interest in what is going on around the world. The terrorist attacks on the twin towers and Pentagon 20 years ago, which triggered the wars and interventions against Kuwait, Iraq and Afghanistan and their results, led to exhaustion and disappointment beyond concrete acts of revenge, like the capture and killing of Osama bin Laden.
George W. Bush and Barack Obama after him — against the wishes of then-Vice President Biden — continued the intervention in Afghanistan based on that idea of nation building that had dominated a large part of U.S. foreign policy in the second half of the last century.
But since Donald Trump, who promised to put an end to foreign interventions, was elected, it was clear where the will of American voters lay. In fact, it was Trump who had negotiated the withdrawal from Afghanistan; Biden subsequently only adjusted the dates.
Biden said it clearly on Tuesday, Aug. 31: “As we turn the page on the foreign policy that has guided our nation the last two decades, we’ve got to learn from our mistakes. To me, there are two that are paramount. First, we must set missions with clear achievable goals, not ones we’ll never reach. And second, we must stay clearly focused on the fundamental national security interests of the United States of America. This decision about Afghanistan is not just about Afghanistan. It’s about ending an era of major military operations to remake other countries.”
Somehow, I think Biden’s decision will sit well with voters in a few months, including many conservative Americans.
Biden, ¿el fin de una era?
Después de unos días desastrosos y trágicos por los ataques de grupos terroristas alrededor del aeropuerto de Kabul, el presidente de EU, Joseph Biden, anunció el fin de la evacuación de estadunidenses y aliados de Afganistán y con eso el fin de la intervención más larga en la historia de su país.
Le salió caro a Biden la decisión en críticas desde la oposición republicana y conservadora, pero también en las páginas y pantallas de los principales medios de comunicación. Las encuestas señalan una caída en su aprobación después de lo sucedido en Kabul.
Sin embargo, esa caída podría no ser más profunda en las próximas semanas. Hace algunos años que la sociedad estadunidense no tiene mucho interés por lo que pasa en el mundo. Los ataques terroristas de hace 20 años contra las Torres Gemelas y el Pentágono, que provocaron las guerras e intervenciones contra Kuwait, Irak y Afganistán, y sus resultados, provocaron cansancio y decepción más allá de actos de venganza concretos, como la captura y asesinato de Osama Bin Laden.
George W. Bush y después Barack Obama —en contra de los deseos de su entonces vicepresidente Biden— continuaron la intervención en Afganistán con base en aquella idea de construcción de país que había dominado buena parte de la política exterior de EU en la segunda mitad del siglo pasado.
Pero ya desde Trump, quien prometió terminar con esas intervenciones extranjeras, quedaba claro dónde estaba la voluntad del elector estadunidense. De hecho, fue Trump quien había negociado la salida de Afganistán que luego Biden solo ajustó en fechas.
Biden lo dijo con claridad el martes: “A medida que pasamos la página de la política exterior que ha guiado a nuestra nación en las últimas dos décadas, tenemos que aprender de nuestros errores. Para mí, hay dos que son primordiales. Primero, debemos establecer misiones con objetivos claros y alcanzables, no unos que nunca alcanzaremos. Y segundo, debemos mantenernos claramente enfocados en el interés fundamental de seguridad nacional de los EUA. Esta decisión sobre Afganistán no se trata solo de Afganistán. Se trata de poner fin a una era de grandes operaciones militares para rehacer otros países”.
De alguna manera, creo que en unos meses la decisión de Biden caerá bien entre los electores, incluidos muchos conservadores estadunidenses.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Trump’s threat is purely economic, employing the power of coercion and open blackmail, to keep a ‘servant’ perpetually under subjugation from attaining economic independence.
Even Jake Sullivan, former United States president Joe Biden’s national security adviser, said “the Washington Consensus is a promise that was not kept[.]”
While Washington claims Tehran desires an agreement, Iran insists no dialogue will take place without the lifting of sanctions and guarantees respecting its nuclear rights.
Senator Ted Cruz's warning to the Christian establishment about the rise of antisemitism on the American Right applies equally to the Israeli establishment. This poison is spreading among young Christians who will form America's leadership in the next generation.
The crown prince’s historic visit to the US this week crowned these bilateral relations, elevating Saudi Arabia to the status of a major non-NATO ally and a trusted strategic partner.
While China has warned of serious consequences and may impose sanctions, the U.S. frames the sale as a necessary sustainment measure for existing aircraft rather than an escalation.
While Trump is a powerful force within the Republican Party, his polarising presence is creating substantial challenges for the party in appealing to a broad enough coalition to secure consistent, nationwide victories beyond his core base.
[T]he Republican Party is now a coalition of religious conservatives, the social and economic right, and libertarian oligarchs. For their part, the Democrats have become a broad “tent” uniting liberals, moderates, and socialists.