Japan Should Support America in Adopting ‘No 1st Use’ Nuclear Policy

Published in Tokyo Shimbun
(Japan) on 8 November 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by D Baker. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
There are aspirations within President Joe Biden’s administration to officially commit to a 'no first use' policy in the document that outlines the government's nuclear weapon strategy, the Nuclear Posture Review. The Japanese government must not hinder these efforts.

A no first use policy means that a country will not use nuclear weapons unless an enemy uses them first. It is a move to reduce the role of nuclear weapons and the risk of nuclear war.

President Biden has long favored a 'no first use policy,' and said nuclear weapons should be limited to deterring and retaliating against nuclear attacks. This is a major change in direction from the previous administration of Donald Trump, which promoted the development of functional nuclear weapons and favored increased dependence on them.

According to the Financial Times in Britain, the U.S. administration approached Japan, the United Kingdom, France and other allies about the issue of adopting a no first use policy in the NPR, although this met an overwhelmingly negative response.

Former President Barack Obama, who set out a vision of a world without nuclear weapons, advocated a no first use policy in 2016, but had to abandon the idea after encountering opposition from countries, including Japan, that claimed the policy would send the wrong message to China about America's commitment to protecting its allies.

It would be inconsistent for the Japan to oppose a no first use policy after it has stressed the need for reducing the role of nuclear weapons. Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has repeatedly stated that nuclear disarmament is his life's work. Now is the time for him to step up and support the Biden administration in adopting a no first use policy.

In September, a number of individuals, including citizen groups in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, sent an open letter to representatives of all domestic political parties, urging them not to oppose a no first use policy.

In addition to this, former U.S. Secretary of Defense William Perry and the Federation of American Scientists sent a similar letter to then-Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide and others, stating, “It would be tragic if Japan, the only country to suffer nuclear attacks, and a staunch advocate of the abolition of nuclear weapons, blocked this small but important step toward the abolition of nuclear weapons.”

The danger of nuclear war started by misidentification or technological malfunction remains. Even if this type of event does not occur, nuclear accidents such as radioactive leaks are prone to happen. Simply possessing nuclear weapons presents danger.

This year, the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which prohibits the manufacture, possession and use of nuclear weapons, took effect. As the only country to have experienced the devastation of nuclearnweapons, Japan must not turn away from its responsibility to advocate for nuclear disarmament.




<社説>核の先制不使用 日本は米国の後押しを


バイデン米政権は新しい核戦略の指針である「核体制の見直し(NPR)」で、核兵器の先制不使用を打ち出すことを目指している。日本政府はこれを阻んではならない。
 相手が核で攻撃してこない限り、こちらも核を使用しないというのが「核の先制不使用」である。核の役割を減らして核戦争のリスクを低めることを狙った政策だ。
 バイデン大統領はかねて先制不使用の採用に前向きで、核保有の目的は相手の核攻撃抑止と報復に限定すべきだと唱えてきた。「使える核」の開発を進めて核依存を強めたトランプ前政権からの大きな転換である。
 英紙フィナンシャル・タイムズによると、米政府はNPRの取りまとめに向けて、先制不使用政策の採用を日英仏などの同盟国に打診したが、否定的な反応が圧倒的だったという。
 「核なき世界」を掲げたオバマ元大統領も二〇一六年に先制不使用を宣言しようとしたが、日本などから「同盟国を守る米国の決意について中国に誤ったメッセージを送ることになる」という反対に遭って断念した。
 だが「核の役割低減」を主張してきた政府が先制不使用に反対するのは、矛盾している。岸田文雄首相は「核軍縮はライフワーク」と常々言ってきた。ならば先制不使用を目指すバイデン政権を後押しすべきだ。
 この九月、広島や長崎の市民団体などが先制不使用に反対しないよう求める公開書簡を各党代表に送った。
 米国からもペリー元国防長官や全米科学者連盟などが同趣旨の書簡を当時の菅義偉首相らに送り「核廃絶に向けた小さな、しかし重要な一歩を、核攻撃を受けた唯一の国の日本が阻止することになれば、悲劇的だ」と訴えた。
 誤認や計器の誤作動によって核ミサイルが発射され、核戦争に発展する危険性は常にある。それに至らぬまでも、放射能漏れなどの核兵器事故は起きている。核は保有するだけでも危険なのだ。
 核兵器を違法とし製造、保有、使用などを禁じる核兵器禁止条約が今年、発効した。政府はこれにも背を向けている。被爆国の責務を果たすべきだ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Russia: This Can’t Go On Forever*

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Turmoil in Los Angeles: Key Test of Trump’s Power

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia

Topics

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Germany: Peace Report 2025: No Common Ground with Trump

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Turmoil in Los Angeles: Key Test of Trump’s Power

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail

Related Articles

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Israel: Trump Wants To Sell Warplanes to Turkey and This Is Bad News for Israel

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Japan: Trump’s Tariffs Threaten To Repeat Historical Mistakes