Managing the Release of Stockpiled Oil without Causing Chaos in the Market

Published in Hokkaido Shimbun
(Japan) on 25 November 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dani Long. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
In order to keep crude oil prices in check, the Biden administration has announced that it will release part of its oil reserves into the market, in collaboration with other countries such as Japan, China and the U.K.

The sudden increase in the price of crude oil could usher in high prices for other commodities and is the main source of economic problems. That these countries, which are all major consumers of crude oil, will work together on these measures is significant.

However, this announcement from the U.S. was met with a further increase in crude oil prices. This is because there is a widespread belief that oil-producing countries such as those in the Middle East restrict production in response to the movement to release stockpiles.

Compared to how much oil is in the market now, the amount that can be released from stockpiles is negligible. Can these measures really result in lower prices?

Oil-producing countries are reluctant to increase production because they believe that demand will not easily recover from the effects of COVID-19.

In the long term, demand will certainly decline due to the trend toward decarbonization. For the time being, however, a continuation of the oil supply shortage would have enormous harmful effects.

Countries that consume oil should persist in negotiating with oil-producing countries to find a balance between production and prices. Oil-producing countries also have a responsibility to be flexible in coordinating with oil-consuming nations.

After the announcement from the United States, Prime Minister Fumio Kishida also announced that he would open Japan’s stockpile for the first time.

National stockpiling began with the first oil crisis. There are 10 such stockpiles nationwide, such as the one in the eastern region of Tomakomai, Hokkaido.

From the stockpile, which contains enough for 145 days of Japanese domestic consumption, a few hundred thousand kiloliters will be sold on the market.

It is worrisome that the legal basis for the release is unclear.

The 1975 Oil Stockpiling Act provides that release from the stockpile is limited to times of disaster or if there are fears of a supply disruption. Does the desire to control prices comply with the intent of the law?

Initially, the Japanese government said that “because there is a surplus, there’s no problem.” After that, the explanation changed to “a sale to replace old petroleum with new.”

It is said that the release is in line with the intentions of the United States.

The government will also subsidize petroleum wholesalers in an effort to reduce the prices of gasoline and kerosene. That said, it is still doubtful that the subsidies will be sufficiently reflected in retail prices.

Effective support measures are needed so that kerosene demand is met and people’s lives are not affected.

The slowdown of production in the United States, the largest oil producer, is also a factor in the rise in oil prices.

The oil industry’s profits have suffered from competition with the Middle East and the effects of COVID-19, causing management streamlining to be prioritized. The Biden administration’s decarbonization policy also conflicts with increased production.

If other countries are asked to increase production, these points should be carefully explained.


原油価格を抑えるため、米バイデン政権は日本、中国、英国などと協調して石油備蓄の一部を市場に放出すると発表した。

 原油価格の高騰は各国で物価高を招き、経済の波乱要因となっている。主要消費国が対策で足並みをそろえる意義は小さくない。

 ところが米国の発表を受け、原油価格は上昇してしまった。

 中東などの産油国が備蓄放出の動きに反発して生産量を絞る―との見方が広がったためだ。

 原油市場の規模に比べ、放出できる備蓄量はごくわずかだ。価格を期待通り引き下げる効果が見込めるのだろうか。

 産油国が増産に消極的なのは、コロナ禍で落ちた需要が簡単には回復しないとみているためだ。

 脱炭素の流れの中、需要が長期的に減っていくのは確かだ。とはいえ、現在のような供給不足が続くのは弊害が大きすぎる。

 消費国は産油国と粘り強く協議し、折り合える生産量と価格を探るべきだ。産油国も、責任の重さを踏まえ柔軟に対応してほしい。

 米国の発表を受け岸田文雄首相はきのう、石油の国家備蓄を初めて放出する考えを表明した。

 国家備蓄は第1次石油危機を契機に始まった。苫小牧東部地域など全国10カ所に基地がある。

 国内消費量145日分の備蓄のうち、数日分に当たる数十万キロリットルを市場で売却する。

 気になるのは、放出の法的根拠がはっきりしないことである。

 石油備蓄法が放出を認めるのは、災害時や供給が途絶する恐れがある場合に限られる。今回は価格抑制が目的であり、法の趣旨に合致しないのではなかろうか。

 政府は当初「余剰分なので問題ない」と言い、その後「古い石油を新しい石油に入れ替えるための売却」と説明を変遷させている。

 米国の意向に沿い、放出ありきで進めたと言われても仕方ない。

 政府は石油元売りに補助金を出し、ガソリンや灯油の価格を抑えるとも言う。だが補助金が小売値に十分反映されるかは疑わしい。

 灯油需要期を迎え国民生活にこれ以上影響が出ないよう、実効性のある支援策が欠かせない。

 原油価格を巡っては、最大の産油国である米国の生産が伸びないことも上昇要因とされる。

 中東との競争やコロナ禍で石油業界の採算は悪化し、経営合理化を優先させている。米政権の脱炭素方針も増産の逆風だ。

 他国に増産を求めるなら、こうした点を丁寧に説明すべきだ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Germany: Trump’s Selfishness

Canada: Tell Me Again Which North American Leader Is Acting like a Dictator?

Austria: Deterrence, but Not for Everyone

Topics

Canada: No, Joly, We Don’t Want America’s Far-Left Academic Refugees

Germany: Trump’s Selfishness

Austria: Trump Ignores Israel’s Interests during Gulf Visit

Germany: Trump’s Offer and Trump’s Sword

Canada: A Guide To Surviving the Trump Era

Canada: Trump Prioritizes Commerce Over Shared Values in Foreign Policy Gamble

Australia: Another White House Ambush Sends a Message to World Leaders Entering Donald Trump’s Den

Related Articles

Canada: No, Joly, We Don’t Want America’s Far-Left Academic Refugees

Mexico: Trump and His Pyrrhic Victories

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats