Ukraine Crisis: Japan Must Mirror US Sanctions

Published in Sankei News
(Japan) on 27 January 2022
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Max Guerrera-Sapone. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
The risk of a Russian invasion of Ukraine is rising.

The American government has ordered a force of some 8,500 troops to prepare for deployment to Europe. It has also made clear that, in the event of a Russian invasion, it will implement export restrictions on high-tech parts to Russia along with financial sanctions.

An invasion of Ukraine would be a flagrant act of aggression against a sovereign country. To prevent an invasion, Prime Minister Fumio Kishida should act in concert with the Americans and declare his willingness to consider placing economic sanctions on Russia.

In the event of an invasion, Japan should, together with America, impose stringent sanctions without a moment’s delay. Preparations for this must be made immediately.

U.S. President Joe Biden expressed his concerns on Jan. 25, when he stated that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would be the gravest act of military aggression since World War II and “would change the world.” He also said that he was considering imposing sanctions on the person of Russian President Vladimir Putin. At a meeting of European leaders, there was discussion of implementing measures that would make Russia pay “a high economic price” for any invasion.

Regrettably, Japan’s response to what is an international crisis has been obtuse.

In talks with Biden on Jan. 21, Kishida confirmed that he would take “strong action” in the event of a Russian invasion of Ukraine. At the Jan. 26 meeting of the House of Representatives Budget Committee, however, Kishida said only the following: “I am very concerned about the Russian military buildup and am keeping a close eye on the situation. Putting emphasis on discussions within the Group of Seven developed countries forum, I will respond as appropriate.” Where was any explanation of the “strong action” he said he would take?

Japan’s half-baked response to the 2014 Russian annexation of the southern Ukrainian territory of Crimea must not be repeated. The Japanese government at that time took such measures as pausing talks to ease visa requirements, which caused no real harm to Russia, and appeared weaker than even the European Union’s half-hearted response.

At that time, Shinzo Abe’s government was trying to avoid any worsening of relations with Russia so as to prevent hindering what were then ongoing negotiations to return the Northern Territories to Japanese rule. Those four islands were invaded by the Soviet Union amid the confusion at the end of World War II. To this day, Russia continues to illegally occupy them. On the points of infringement of sovereignty and territory, this was no different from Russia's actions in Crimea and Ukraine. Japan, which has witnessed first-hand Russia’s disregard for the principles of sovereignty, should stand at the vanguard of criticism of Russian actions in Ukraine now.

In Asia, China is threatening the territory and territorial waters of its neighboring countries. China is watching how each country is responding to Russia's aggression. Kishida should display a firm stance: Japan does not recognize any attempts to change the status quo through the use of force.


ロシアによるウクライナへの軍事侵攻の危険がさらに高まっている。

米政府は約8500人の米軍部隊に対し、欧州への派遣に備えるよう命じた。また、ロシアが侵攻した場合、ハイテク部品などの対露輸出禁止措置や金融制裁を発動する方針を明らかにした。

ウクライナへの侵攻は主権国家に対する明白な侵略である。岸田文雄首相は、侵攻を防ぐためにも、米国と歩調を合わせ経済制裁の検討を表明すべきだ。

侵攻した場合は、間髪入れずに米国とともに厳しい制裁を科すべきである。そのための態勢を早急に整えなければならない。

バイデン米大統領は25日、ロシア軍が侵攻すれば先の大戦後で最大の侵略になるとし、「世界を変える」との危機感を示した。ロシアのプーチン大統領個人への制裁を検討する考えも表明した。欧州首脳との会談では、ロシアに「経済的に大きな代償を払わせる」措置などを協議した。

問題は、この世界的危機に際して日本の動きが鈍いことだ。

岸田首相は21日のバイデン氏との会談で、ウクライナ侵攻に「強い行動」を取ることを確認した。だが、26日の衆院予算委員会で岸田首相は「露軍増強の動きなどに重大な懸念を持って注視している。先進7カ国(G7)の枠組みを重視しながら適切に対応する」と述べるにとどまった。「強い行動」について、何ひとつ説明できないのはどうしたことか。

2014年にロシアがウクライナ南部クリミア半島を併合した際の煮え切らない日本政府の対応を繰り返してはならない。日本政府は査証(ビザ)協議の停止など米国はおろか、欧州連合(EU)よりも腰の引けた対応で、ロシアに実害の及ばない措置だった。

安倍晋三政権下の当時、北方領土の返還交渉を抱え、プーチン露政権との関係悪化を避けたいとの思惑があったとされる。だが、北方領土はソ連が大戦末期の混乱に乗じて侵攻し、ロシアが不法占拠している。主権と領土の侵害という点でクリミアやウクライナと変わらない。日本こそ、ロシア批判の先頭に立つべきである。

アジア地域では中国が、他国の領土や領海を脅かしている。中国はロシアに対する各国の対応をみている。岸田首相には、力による現状変更を認めないという日本の強い姿勢を示してもらいたい。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Philippines: ‘Bye, Bye, Miss American Pie’

Egypt: Davos 2026 and the Reshaping of the International Order: The Trump–El-Sisi Summit

Ireland: How Should the EU Deal with Trump? Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick

Germany: Trump Now Wants To Rule the World Too

Indonesia: Why Power Makes Leaders See Threats Everywhere

Topics

South Korea: ICE: A Cold That Cuts Flesh

Egypt: Davos 2026 and the Reshaping of the International Order: The Trump–El-Sisi Summit

Saudi Arabia: Imposing Peace Through War

India: US Sutra | America Is at War with Itself: Minnesota Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Australia: Donald Trump’s Many Foreign Policy Bluffs Come at a Political Price

Australia: Donald Trump Has Iran in His Sights, but What Is His Endgame?

Austria: Donald Trump, Ice Cold Narcissist

Ireland: Ireland’s Reluctance To Speak Out against Trump’s Board of Peace Is Shameful

Related Articles

Indonesia: Why Power Makes Leaders See Threats Everywhere

Luxembourg: No Cold War: How the US and Russia Are Gradually Becoming Mirror Images of Each Other

India: How US Is ‘Rediscovering’ Japan to Check China

Japan: 1 Year into Trump Administration: Don’t Lose Your Allies’ Trust

Taiwan: If National Interest Comes 1st, What about Taiwan?