US Forces in Japan Should Not Be Lifting COVID-19 Measures

Published in Ryukyu Shimpo
(Japan) on 1 February 2022
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by D Baker. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
On Jan. 31, measures confining U.S. military personnel to their bases to minimize the spread of COVID-19 were lifted. The move was approved by the Japanese government.

It was the actions of U.S. forces that instigated the current outbreak; after the Japanese government's delayed response, Okinawa was left dealing with record numbers of new cases.

It is unacceptable that U.S. forces have ignored Okinawa Prefecture's request to further extend restrictions on leaving U.S. bases and have instead lifted them. At the very least, the regulations should remain in place until the prefecture's “pre-emergency COVID-19 measures” end.

Last Dec. 17, the prefecture announced that a large cluster of cases had been identified at the Camp Hansen military base. An employee at the same location was the first in Okinawa to be diagnosed with the omicron variant.

At the time, it was discovered that U.S. forces had failed to conduct PCR tests on personnel entering Japan from the United States at all U.S. military bases in Japan, including those in Okinawa. It also came to light that U.S. military personnel were able to move freely around bases during their period of quarantine after entering the country. These were major flaws in the measures put in place by U.S. forces to stop the spread of COVID-19.

However, it was not until 20 days after the cluster at Camp Hansen had been identified that Foreign Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi requested stronger COVID-19 regulations, including restrictions on U.S. military personnel leaving their bases.

The failure to prevent the outbreak during the quarantine period is due to the U.S.-Japan Status of Forces Agreement, which states that infectious disease control is the responsibility of U.S. forces.

According to Article 9, U.S. military personnel are exempt from Japanese laws and regulations when entering the country. So long as the agreement that grants privileged status to U.S. forces is not amended and its loopholes remain, it is likely there will be further outbreaks due to the actions of U.S. military personnel.

In response to questions in the Diet on Jan. 21, Prime Minister Fumio Kishida indicated that he does not intend to reform the U.S.-Japan Status of Forces Agreement. Why doesn't he have the will to do so when that very agreement is endangering the lives of citizens?

In response to the lifting of restrictions confining U.S. forces to their bases, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated, “We accept that restrictions have come to an end as a result of a decline in the number of new cases among U.S. military personnel in Japan, as monitored by both sides.” However, there are questions to be answered about the testing methods employed by U.S. forces.

The Japanese government has been unable to confirm the type of antigen testing used by U.S. forces on military bases in Japan (as of Jan. 24). The Japanese government is requesting that quantitative antigen tests, which are used across Japan, also be used at bases, as they have the same level of accuracy as PCR tests. However, U.S. forces have yet to disclose any details about the kind of tests they use, as revealed by Kishida and Hayashi at the Lower House Budget Committee on Jan. 24. If this is the case, how can we trust any reports by U.S. forces?

To add to this situation, a derivative strain 18% more transmissible than omicron has been identified within Japan. It has been noted that this derivative may become the dominant strain, and as Okinawa Governor Denny Tamaki said, “We are not in a position to be lifting restrictions.” The decision to drop COVID-19 regulations at U.S. bases is reckless.


<社説>米軍が外出制限解除 重点措置中は継続せよ
2022年2月1日 05:00

在日米軍は1月31日、新型コロナウイルス感染拡大を受けて実施していた基地からの外出制限を解除した。日本政府も解除に同意した。
 今回の感染拡大の引き金になったのは米軍であり、日本政府対応が後手に回ったため、沖縄は過去最多の新規感染者が発生した。
 沖縄県が外出制限の再延長を求めたにもかかわらず、米軍が制限を解除したことは全く容認できない。少なくとも県の「まん延防止等重点措置」期間が解除されるまで、外出制限を継続すべきだ。
 昨年12月17日、県はキャンプ・ハンセンで大規模クラスターが発生したと発表した。同基地の従業員が県内初の「オミクロン株」の確認事例となった。
 このとき、米軍は沖縄を含む全ての在日米軍施設で、米国からの出国時にPCR検査を実施していなかったことが発覚した。入国直後の行動制限期間中に米兵らが基地内を自由に動き回れていたことも判明した。米軍の水際対策に欠陥があったのだ。
 しかし、林芳正外相が米兵の外出制限を含む対策強化を要請したのは、キャンプ・ハンセンのクラスター発生から20日後だった。
 水際で食い止められない原因は、感染症対策を米軍任せにせざるを得ない日米地位協定の存在がある。9条によって入国手続きに関し日本の法令が適用されない。水際対策に穴があいた状態なのである。米軍の特権的な地位を定めた協定を見直して穴をふさがない限り、米軍由来の感染拡大が繰り返されるだろう。
 しかし、岸田文雄首相は1月21日の衆参両院の代表質問で、日米地位協定を改定しない考えを示した。なぜ、国民の生命を危険にさらしている地位協定を見直すと表明できないのか。
 在日米軍の外出制限終了について、外務省は「これまでの双方の継続監視で、在日米軍関係者の新規陽性者も減少傾向にある結果として終了するに至ったと受け止めている」と説明した。しかし、米軍の検査方法には疑問がある。
 在日米軍基地で米軍が実施する抗原検査について、日本政府は検査方法を確認できていない(1月24日時点)。日本政府は国内で実施するものと同じ「抗原定量検査」を求めている。「抗原定量検査」はPCR検査と同等の検査精度があるからだ。しかし、米側は検査内容を明かしていない。24日の衆院予算委員会で、岸田首相、林外相が答弁で明らかにした。この状態で、どうして米軍の報告をうのみにできるのか。
 さらに感染力がこれまでのオミクロン株より18%高いとされる別の派生株が国内で見つかっている。派生株へ置き換わる可能性も指摘される。現状でも「制限を解除できる状態にあるとは言えない」(玉城デニー知事)中で、米軍の外出制限の解除はあまりにも拙速だ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: Minnesota School Shooting Is Just More Proof That America Is Crazed

Australia: Australia Boosts Corporate Law Enforcement as America Goes Soft

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Germany: The President and His Private Army

Topics

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Related Articles

Nigeria: 80 Years after Hiroshima, Nagasaki Atomic Bombings: Any Lesson?

Taiwan: Trump’s Japan Negotiation Strategy: Implications for Taiwan

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Japan: Iran Ceasefire Agreement: The Danger of Peace by Force

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far