From Biden and Xi to Blue and Green

Published in Taiwan Times
(Taiwan) on 15 November 2022
by Li Li-shen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jennifer Sampson. Edited by Wes Vanderburgh.
Joe Biden and Xi Jinping, the two leaders of the U.S. and China, met in a historic encounter that received global attention. For those who were watching for their positions on the issue of Taiwan, neither side budged an inch. Although on the surface, both powers exhibited the smiles of soft diplomacy, neither Biden nor Xi will budge on Taiwan's situation, which is to be expected. At least it was not a meeting with malicious intent, which is more than can be said of Taiwan's polarized national consciousness in which the blue Kuomintang Party and green Democratic Progressive Party adhere to their own views and do not discuss anything.

While the whole world paid attention to Biden and Xi's discussion of Taiwan, the outcome after the meeting ended was close to national and international predictions. Biden expressed to Xi his opposition to China's coercion and increasingly provocative behavior toward Taiwan, while Xi proposed that resolving the Taiwan issue was a domestic matter for China. This kind of talk makes Taiwan anxious. How does the rest of the world regard Taiwan and the U.S. and China's hard red line on the issue? It is a world divided, that's how.

Before they both became leaders of their respective countries, Biden and Xi had met and could be considered old acquaintances. Meeting again years later as the two most influential leaders in the world, older and wiser, they must have had mixed feelings. However, international diplomacy is so raw and pragmatic that the two do not have time to sympathize with one another.

One of the main keys to Biden and Xi's sharp opposition is that in arbitrating on the matter of Taiwan, Biden is not an impartial party, based on his defense of U.S. national interests and international order. Until now in Taiwan, on the issues of national interest and independence or reunification, Taiwan's green and blue parties have always taken two parallel tracks that will never intersect.

For the sake of national interests, Biden and Xi can meet. For the sake of Taiwan's national interests, green and blue parties have difficulty meeting! Of course, Taiwan's local elections are currently being fought, just as the presidential election will soon be. Both parties coming together to discuss national interests in such a short period is a non-starter.


(無事不論)從拜習到藍綠

美中兩大領導人拜登和習近平完成全球關注的歷史性會晤,對國人緊盯台灣議題的立場,雙方半吋不退,但「強強配」表面仍展現柔軟的微笑外交;拜習會對台海風雲毫無讓步,本在預期中,但仍非「會無好會」,至少強過台灣兩極化的國家意識,藍綠堅持己見,完全沒得商量。

拜習會觸及台灣議題,雖全球關注,但強強會晤落幕,結論跟原來國際和國內預估,相差不遠。拜登向習近平表達反對中國對台灣脅迫與日益挑釁的行為、習近平向拜登提出「解決台灣問題是中國內政」這種讓國人跳腳的言論,兩強對台灣議題的硬底子紅線,對全球如何看待台灣?正是一個地球切兩半。

拜登和習近平尚未坐上國家領導人大位前,即曾會面,也算舊識;時隔多年再會晤,兩人同為全球最具影響力的領袖,兩人那種「已非昔日吳下阿蒙」,理應百感交集,但國際外交就是這麼赤裸且現實,讓兩人來不及惺惺相惜。

拜習尖銳對立,關鍵之一就是「事主台灣」,「公親拜登」如此強勢,也是基於捍衛美國國家利益和國際秩序。但台灣藍綠至今在至關國家利益的統獨意識上,從戒嚴到解嚴、再從解嚴到史上最自由國度的現在,雙方始終走在兩條平行線,盡頭永無交集點。

美中為了國家利益,拜習可會;台灣為了國家利益,藍綠難會!當然,目前九合一選舉激戰,緊接著是總統大選,藍綠坐下來談論國家利益,短期內還是假議題。(記者李麗慎)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Iran and Israel: a Fragile Cease-fire

Pakistan: After Me, the Deluge

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Canada: Trump Did What Had To Be Done

Topics

Canada: Trump Did What Had To Be Done

Japan: Reckless Government Usage of Military To Suppress Protests

Mexico: The Military, Migrants and More

Australia: NATO Aims To Flatter, but Trump Remains Unpredictable

Germany: Can Donald Trump Be Convinced To Remain Engaged in Europe?

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Iran and Israel: a Fragile Cease-fire

India: US, Israel and the Age of Moral Paralysis

Related Articles

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Taiwan: 2 Terms Won’t Satisfy Trump