Pressure on TikTok Is US-Style Robbery

Published in Guangming Daily
(China) on 21 March 2023
by Guo Yan (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jo Sharp. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States recently warned TikTok that unless its parent company, ByteDance, sold its stake in the company, CFIUS would block the app in the U.S. This is just another example of the United States expanding what it defines as national security. In recent years the U.S. has continually spread lies and abused its power to unjustifiably suppress Chinese companies. Throttling a business in such a brazen and unscrupulous way is no different from a smash-and-grab robbery.

This isn’t the first time that the U.S. government has cracked down on TikTok. Against a backdrop of hyping the “China threat” theory, the U.S. government has repeatedly used the pretext of “national security,” claiming that TikTok might hand over data to the Chinese government, and it has tried a variety of ways to bully TikTok into submission. In August 2020, President Donald Trump signed an executive order requiring TikTok to divest its U.S. operations. The Trump administration claimed at the time that the company stood to “threaten the national security.” In June 2021, President Joe Biden lifted the ban on TikTok but asked the Commerce Department to evaluate the company and act “as appropriate.” Some U.S. politicians have continued to claim that TikTok is a tool that China can use to threaten the U.S.

CIA Director William Burns has bizarrely claimed that TikTok’s popularity worries Washington because “the Chinese government is able to insist upon extracting the private data of a lot of TikTok users in this country and also to shape the content of what goes onto TikTok,” thus posing a threat to U.S. national security.

Although TikTok has said that it has invested $1.5 billion in the U.S. to launch Project Texas, storing the data of U.S. users at Oracle Corporation in Texas to meet data security requirements, this move has not been met with any generosity by the U.S., which has increased restrictions on TikTok. In February the White House told federal agencies to remove TikTok from government devices and systems.

The U.S. government’s crackdown on TikTok has also been fueled by collusion between individual corporate executives and politicians. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been a key driver of political pressure on TikTok. He repeatedly claimed before Congress that the Chinese government has stolen technology from U.S. companies, and he has regularly played up the “China threat” theory. The underlying reason for that is that since its launch, TikTok has challenged Facebook’s market position around the world. Oracle founder Larry Ellison, a direct beneficiary of the crackdown on TikTok, has also repeatedly exaggerated the “China threat.”

U.S. pressure on TikTok follows a typically coercive pattern, featuring lots of U.S.-style ideological capture and allowing self-interest to triumph over open justice. The so-called market economy and fair competition are really only superficial. Governments and companies around the world should realize that TikTok is not the first company to have such an experience with the U.S. and will not be the last. Such domineering and aggressive behavior by the U.S. violates market principles and international norms. It will not only hurt TikTok but will also damage the business environment of the U.S. itself with inevitable long-term negative impacts on its economy.


美国外国投资委员会近日威胁TikTok,要求其母公司字节跳动出售TikTok的股份,否则将在美国封禁该应用程序。此举是美方泛化国家安全概念的又一例证。近年来,美方持续散布虚假信息,滥用国家力量无理打压中国有关企业,如此不顾脸面、不择手段去扼杀一家企业,与抢劫、豪夺无异。
  这不是美国政府首次打压TikTok,在反复鼓吹和炒作“中国威胁论”背景下,美国政府频频打出“国家安全”旗号,妄称TikTok可能将美国用户数据“移交给中国政府”,动用各种手段威逼TikTok,妄图迫其就范。2020年8月,时任美国总统特朗普签署一份行政令,要求字节跳动剥离TikTok在美业务。特朗普政府当时宣称,该公司可能采取“威胁美国国家安全”的行动;2021年6月,现任美国总统拜登一度撤销了针对TikTok的禁令,但同时要求美商务部对其进行评估,并“酌情采取行动”。一些美政客此后持续叫嚣“TikTok是中国威胁美国的工具”。
  美国中央情报局局长威廉·伯恩斯曾妄称,TikTok的受欢迎程度令华盛顿感到担忧,因为“中国政府可以坚持要求获取美国用户信息的访问权限并获得访问权限,还能控制社交平台上的内容,对美国的国家安全构成威胁”。
  尽管TikTok表示,公司已经投入15亿美元在美国推出“得克萨斯计划”,将美国用户的数据存储在得克萨斯州的美国甲骨文公司,以满足保护数据安全的要求。但这些举动并没有换来美方的“高抬贵手”,对于TikTok的禁令一直在收紧。今年2月,白宫要求政府机构在其联邦设备和系统上禁用TikTok。
  美国政府对TikTok的打压,还因个别美国企业高管和美政客合谋推波助澜。脸书首席执行官马克·扎克伯格一直是TikTok在美国遭遇政治胁迫的重要推手,他曾在美国国会多次声称中国政府窃取了美国企业的技术,频繁渲染“中国威胁论”。其根本原因在于TikTok自推出以来,在全球范围内挑战了脸书的市场地位。TikTok被打压的直接受益者——甲骨文公司,其创始人拉里·埃里森也多次渲染“中国威胁论”。
  美方对TikTok的施压,是典型的胁迫交易,充满了美式意识形态绑架,让私利战胜了公理,所谓的市场经济和公平竞争仅剩下苍白的皮囊。世界各国政府和企业都应当意识到,TikTok在美国的遭遇不是第一家,也绝非最后一家。美方这种霸道蛮横的行径,违反了市场原则和国际规则,伤害的不仅仅是TikTok,更会破坏美国自身的营商环境,必将对美国经济造成长远负面影响。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Donald Trump Is Taking Over the US Federal Reserve and Financial Markets Have Missed the Point

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Pakistan: Trump’s Gaza Blueprint Unfolds

Canada: Minnesota School Shooting Is Just More Proof That America Is Crazed

Topics

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Related Articles

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands

Zimbabwe: What the West Doesn’t Understand about China’s Growing Military Might

Sri Lanka: Trump Is Very Hard on India and Brazil, but For Very Different Reasons