Why Was China Not Discussed in the US Presidential Debate?

Published in Sankei Shimbun
(Japan) on 29 June 2024
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dorothy Phoenix. Edited by Michelle Bisson.
You can't say the debate was productive. The problem of how to protect world peace and stability is urgent because autocratic, power-loving nations threaten the international order with their continued actions.

Watching the world's No. 1 major economic and military nation, we had hoped that the first thing the U.S. presidential candidates discussed would be their readiness and concrete policies.

This was the first televised debate between President Joe Biden, a Democrat, and former President Donald Trump, the Republican candidate. The main themes were domestic issues, including economic and immigration measures and abortion.

All of these are major subjects that directly affect and concern the lives of the American people, and it is reasonable to discuss them. On the other hand, it is problematic that there was no discussion about China, the primary cause of disturbance to the international order.

China is increasing pressure on the administration of Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te without ruling out the use of military force against Taiwan. It is also continuing its aggressive military expansion in the South China Sea, intensifying friction with the Philippines. China is also a threat from the standpoint of economic security, including allegations of stealing high tech.

We hope that future debates, including the one scheduled in September, will address attitudes and policies regarding China.

The discussion of Russia's invasion of Ukraine went no deeper.

"No major war in Europe has ever been able to be contained just to Europe ... this kind of dislocation [invasion] has a serious threat to the whole world peace," Biden said, emphasizing the significance of his administration's support for Ukraine.

Trump criticized Biden, saying that “if we had a real president ... that was respected by Putin... he would have never invaded Ukraine." Trump further asserted that he “would have that war settled ... as president-elect,” but neither candidate has expressed any concrete plan for effecting the Russian military's complete withdrawal or peace.

The debate also failed to address the situation in the Palestinian territory of Gaza.

Trump asserted that Israel should be allowed to “finish the job.” He shared his own theory that had he been president, the fighting in Gaza would not have happened.

During the debate, the candidates attacked each other as the “worst president” in history and accused each other of telling “lies.” It is disappointing that the personal attacks stood out, rather than a debate over policy.


<主張>米大統領選討論会 「中国」をなぜ語らぬのか

実りある討論会だったとは言えまい。力の信奉者である専制国家が国際秩序を脅かす動きを進める中、世界の平和と安定をどう守っていくのかは、火急の課題だ。

世界一の経済・軍事大国で、最も強い影響力を持つ米国の大統領候補にまず語ってほしかったのは、その覚悟と具体的な政策である。

米民主党のバイデン大統領と共和党の前大統領、トランプ候補による初回のテレビ討論会が行われた。経済や移民対策、人工妊娠中絶など、内政問題が主なテーマとなった。

いずれも生活に直結する、米国民の関心が高いテーマだ。これらが論じられるのは当然だろう。一方で国際秩序の最大の攪乱(かくらん)要因である中国について語らなかったのは問題である。

中国は台湾への軍事力行使を否定せず、頼清徳政権への圧迫を強めている。南シナ海でも中国は、強引な軍事拡張を続け、フィリピンと摩擦を強めている。先端技術窃取の疑いなど、経済安全保障上の観点からも脅威である。

両氏には、9月に予定される次回討論会を含めた今後の論戦で、中国に対する姿勢や政策を語ってもらいたい。

ロシアの侵略を受けるウクライナについても議論は深まらなかった。

バイデン氏は「欧州の大きな戦争が欧州だけで収まったことはない。(侵略は)世界の平和に対する深刻な脅威だ」と述べ、政権が行ってきたウクライナ支援の意義を強調した。

トランプ氏は、「プーチン(露大統領)が一目置くような米大統領だったら侵略はなかっただろう」とバイデン氏を批判した。さらに「次期大統領に決まったら、解決に乗り出す」と発言したが、両氏ともロシア軍の全面撤退や和平を実現する具体策を示したわけではない。

パレスチナ自治区ガザ情勢についても、議論はかみ合わなかった。

トランプ氏は、「イスラエルに最後まで仕事をさせるべきだ」と主張し、自身が大統領だったらガザでの戦闘も起きなかった、と持論を展開した。

討論会で両氏は、互いを「史上最悪の大統領」「噓つき」と呼んで非難した。政策論争ではなく、個人攻撃が目立ったのは残念だ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Ukraine War: Cease-fire Still Out of Reach

Japan: Expectations for New Pope To Mend Rifts among American People

OPD: 16 May 2025, edited by Helaine Schweitzer

Russia: Will Trump Investigate Harris? Political Analyst Responds*

Australia: Which Conflicts of Interest? Trump Doubles Down on Crypto

Austria: Soon Putin Will Have Successfully Alienated Trump

Topics

Germany: Trump for the Charlemagne Prize!

Canada: It Turns Out Trump’s Tariffs Were Illegal After All

Australia: Trump’s Tariffs Were Already Ever-Changing. Now, Court Fights Add to the Uncertainty

Austria: Soon Putin Will Have Successfully Alienated Trump

Canada: Scorning Trump’s Golden Dome Would Be a Mistake

Related Articles

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China