Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True
It's good that U.S. President Donald Trump has managed to propose a Middle East peace plan. Whether it comes to pass is another matter.*
For the first time in a long while, a faint glimmer of light flickers at the end of the tunnel in the Middle East. It's hard to say at the moment whether our eyes are deceiving us or whether the stream of light truly reveals an opening. But in any case, there’s some traction in a deadlocked situation that was spiraling downward at an alarming pace. The mere fact that a peace plan exists — one supported by the Arab states involved and at least partially accepted by both Israel and Hamas — is an achievement in itself. Despite all the misgivings about U.S. President Trump, this attempt at peace deserves recognition.
If anyone is capable of forcing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into a peace process, it’s President Trump. Hamas, in turn, cannot fully ignore the wishes of Qatar, where part of its leadership lives in exile. Even so, it's hard to deny that the American peace plan seems too good to be true.
It remains difficult to envision, for instance, how Hamas will consent to its own disarmament, preferring instead to press for negotiations to retain its weapons — and with that, real power. That would be completely unacceptable for Israel, however. And beyond that, far-right elements within Netanyahu’s current cabinet are already threatening to dissolve the coalition — raising the urgent question of with whom the prime minister would even be able to finalize a negotiated peace plan.
Yet aside from the grand vision of everlasting peace in the region, there’s a strong chance that the Israeli hostages — whether dead or alive — could at least be released in exchange for roughly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners. A temporary ceasefire also seems entirely plausible. Such a respite from fighting is no small thing, considering the catastrophic living conditions and ongoing loss of life in the Gaza strip.
Whether anything more can be achieved will depend on the momentum of the negotiations in Cairo. Trump can pound the table all he wants and even nominate himself ahead of time for the Nobel Peace Prize — but ultimately, a minimum level of trust is essential for any peace process. Israeli-Palestinian relations are at an unprecedented low; everything that was achieved in the 1990s has shattered into countless pieces. Repairing these fragments will require time — along with something that’s currently nowhere to be seen: the will for peace.
*Editor’s note: Israel agreed to a ceasefire deal with Hamas on Oct. 10 based on a proposal presented by President Trump a week earlier.
For the first time in a long while, a faint glimmer of light flickers at the end of the tunnel in the Middle East. It's hard to say at the moment whether our eyes are deceiving us or whether the stream of light truly reveals an opening. But in any case, there’s some traction in a deadlocked situation that was spiraling downward at an alarming pace. The mere fact that a peace plan exists — one supported by the Arab states involved and at least partially accepted by both Israel and Hamas — is an achievement in itself. Despite all the misgivings about U.S. President Trump, this attempt at peace deserves recognition.
If anyone is capable of forcing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into a peace process, it’s President Trump. Hamas, in turn, cannot fully ignore the wishes of Qatar, where part of its leadership lives in exile. Even so, it's hard to deny that the American peace plan seems too good to be true.
It remains difficult to envision, for instance, how Hamas will consent to its own disarmament, preferring instead to press for negotiations to retain its weapons — and with that, real power. That would be completely unacceptable for Israel, however. And beyond that, far-right elements within Netanyahu’s current cabinet are already threatening to dissolve the coalition — raising the urgent question of with whom the prime minister would even be able to finalize a negotiated peace plan.
Yet aside from the grand vision of everlasting peace in the region, there’s a strong chance that the Israeli hostages — whether dead or alive — could at least be released in exchange for roughly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners. A temporary ceasefire also seems entirely plausible. Such a respite from fighting is no small thing, considering the catastrophic living conditions and ongoing loss of life in the Gaza strip.
Whether anything more can be achieved will depend on the momentum of the negotiations in Cairo. Trump can pound the table all he wants and even nominate himself ahead of time for the Nobel Peace Prize — but ultimately, a minimum level of trust is essential for any peace process. Israeli-Palestinian relations are at an unprecedented low; everything that was achieved in the 1990s has shattered into countless pieces. Repairing these fragments will require time — along with something that’s currently nowhere to be seen: the will for peace.
*Editor’s note: Israel agreed to a ceasefire deal with Hamas on Oct. 10 based on a proposal presented by President Trump a week earlier.
Previous article![]( "The Kirk Paradox")
Next article![]( "A Sensible Plan for Gaza*")
