We Can Be More Calm in the Face of Hillary's Accusations

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 16 May 2011
by Xi Lan Cheng (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Huifang Yu. Edited by Derek Ha.
During an interview with Atlantic Monthly, Hillary said, “They're worried, and they are trying to stop history, which is a fool's errand. They cannot do it, but they're going to hold it off as long as possible." Almost the whole world read about China being on a "fool's errand" after this quote was cited and reported by mainstream Western media outlets like Reuters, Agence France-Presse and so on. Over 20 famous Chinese international experts were interviewed by the media; 16 viewed Hillary's words as diplomatic faux pas while 12 believed that Hillary should elaborate her position. "Fool's errand" is obviously a derogatory term. It is no wonder that scholars said that this is the most severe official criticism since Clinton accused China of changing in the wrong direction in 1997.

Many netizens are furious at this American diplomat, but I am more cool-headed as there are far too many examples to explain that our actions are not foolish. China is currently on its growth path. The changes that occur in tea production in my hometown, a mountainous area in southern coastal China, serve as an example.

During my trip back home for the Lunar New Year, I realized many locals who used to ride motorcycles are now driving compact cars. As a result, a huge traffic jam took place in Beijing on a certain day of the first month of the Lunar New Year. I heard a highway network would be be built in the mountainous area. In the past, it took about two to three hours to go a few dozen kilometers from the mountains to the seaside by bus. In the future, with the highway, that time will be shortened to less than an hour. In addition, a tea competition took place in this area.

One kilogram of tea leaves picked in spring was auctioned at a price of almost 20,000 yuan. Regardless of the type of famous Chinese tea, such prices are rare. Such prices were unimaginable in the past when excellent quality was associated with reasonable prices. As early as 1978, tea produced from the local tea estate was given as a national gift to Emperor Hirohito of Japan. Now, tea farmers have no reason to worry that their tea will be worthless.

China's development has brought many tangible benefits to many areas in China. These benefits are obvious. Just when everybody is worried that the construction of China's high-speed railway is too fast and costs too much, there are already many who have already enjoyed the benefits of convenience of commuting. We will not deny the success of our accomplishments despite real problems. Talk of the "collapse of China" does not match what people really believe. In fact, Hillary talks of China when discussing how the U.S. should deal with the Middle Eastern revolution, saying, "We live in a real world. We don't walk away from dealing with China because we think they have a deplorable human rights record. We don't walk away from dealing with Saudi Arabia.” What the U.S. dwells on is her own interests.

Samuel P. Huntington pointed out in his book "The Clash of Civilizations" that "economic growth is strengthening Asian governments in relation to Western governments." He also mentioned that "overall the growing economic strength of the Asian countries renders them increasingly immune to Western pressure concerning human rights and democracy." This is also consistent with the current situation of China. All the more reason that this should be the perspective to view the world. Let us not forget when Richard Nixon said in 1994, “Today, China’s economic power makes U.S. lectures about human rights imprudent. Within a decade it will make them irrelevant. Within two decades it will make them laughable.” Whether Hillary's words were right, Huntington makes sense and Nixon's thoughts were far-sighted. Some scholars said that although the same social problems exist in Middle East, China's problems are due to its success while Middle East's problems are due to its failure.

In the long run, strengthening Asian societies is equivalent to strengthening the power of Asian governments, and economic growth will give rise to an increasingly powerful middle class. If this is the case, how does one explain Hillary's open display of disrespect for China if the progress of the Chinese society is not dependent on what she says? Or, perhaps one can say that even a typical American elite like Hillary, despite being straightforward, knows that the relationship between the U.S. and China can never become too good nor too bad.

Author Xi Lan Cheng is a Beijing media figure.


面对希拉里的指责,我们可以更淡定

社评:希拉里莫辱没自己的国务卿之尊

  “他们担心。他们试图阻止历史,这是‘a fool’s errand’(傻瓜的差事)。他们办不到,但他们要坚持尽可能长久。”当美国国务卿希拉里接受《大西洋月刊》专访时说的话,被路透社、法新社等西方主流媒体快速转引和报道后,几乎全地球的人都可以读到中国正在“做蠢事”。随后,20名中国知名国际问题专家接受了媒体采访,其中16人认为希拉里的这种表态属于外交失礼,12人还认为希拉里应就此做出解释。据查证,“fool’s errand”在英文里面显然是一个贬义词。难怪有学者说,这是从1997年克林顿总统指责中国处于“历史错误方向”以来,美国官方对华批评中最严厉的一次了。


  相比许多网友对这位美国第一外交官感到怒不可遏,笔者倒是冷静了许多,因为生活中有太多的例子说明我们干的不是“蠢事”。中国正走在成长路上。以我的家乡——中国南方某沿海产茶山区这几年的一些变化为例:过年回了一趟家,发现以前许多开摩托车的乡亲都开上小汽车了,正月的某一天镇上还发生了北京才有的大堵车现象;而且听说山区很快要建设高速公路网了,以前从山里面坐客车到海边去,短短几十公里也要两三个小时,以后走高速会缩短到1小时之内;另外,最近那里搞了“茶王比赛”,1公斤春茶拍卖出了将近2万元天价,这价格不管哪种中国名茶都罕见。这在以前物美价贱的时候是不可想象的,尽管当地产的茶叶早在1978年,就被作为国礼送给了日本天皇裕仁。茶农应该再不会感叹“有市无价”了。


  中国的发展给很多地方带来了实实在在的好处。有目共睹。正如大家在担心中国的高铁建设是否过快过猛时,有更多的人已享受到了回家、出差更便利的好处。我们不会因为现实中的问题而否认我们取得的成就。中国“正在崩溃”更不符合许多人直观的感受。事实上,希拉里是在讨论美国如何应对中东革命时主动谈到中国的,“我们并不因为中国人权记录糟糕就拒绝与其打交道,我们不拒绝跟沙特打交道……”她比谁都重视包括中国在内的非西方国家的发展给美国带来的机会。要不然她就不会在《大西洋月刊》网站刊发文章的同一天下午说,中美两国“合作比冲突对两国好处更多”,“一个繁荣的美国有利于中国,一个繁荣的中国有利于美国”。美国心里惦记得更多的也是好处。


  亨廷顿在《文明的冲突》一书中讨论“人权与民主”时早已指出,经济增长会加强亚洲国家政府相对于西方国家政府的权力。他说,“亚洲国家总体经济实力的增强,使得它们对西方在人权和民主问题上施加的压力,越来越可以采取置之不理的态度。”这也符合中国眼下的真实情况,更应当成为我们看世界的视角。同时别忘了回顾美国前总统尼克松在1994年说过的话:“今天,中国的经济实力使美国关于人权的说教显得轻率;10年之内,会显得不着边际;20年之内,会显得可笑。”希拉里说的更正确,还是亨廷顿讲的有道理、尼克松想的更有远见,现实已经给出答案。有学者就说了,尽管与中东一样存在社会问题,但中国的问题是成功带来的,不像中东是由失败引起的。


  长远来看,要增强“亚洲社会相对于亚洲国家政府的权力”,有待经济增长催生一个日益强大的中产阶层。这是亨廷顿对人类社会历史发展的另外一个分析。那么,如果说中国的社会进步依靠的不是希拉里的教训,何以解释她会在一个很公开的场合不尊重中国呢?或许可以说,像她这样典型的美国社会精英除性格直率外,也咬定有一个基本的事实改变不了:中美关系好也好不到哪去,坏也坏不到哪去。(作者:溪兰城 北京媒体人)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Pakistan: The Beginning of the 2nd Cold War

Turkey: No Kings in America but What about the Democratic Party?

Canada: Donald Trump Isn’t Just Demolishing the East Wing — He’s Marking Territory He Never Plans To Leave

Ireland: The Irish Times View on the Trump-Zelenskyy Meeting: 1 Step Backward

Topics

South Korea: The CIA and Its Covert ‘Regime Change’ Operations

Canada: Donald Trump Isn’t Just Demolishing the East Wing — He’s Marking Territory He Never Plans To Leave

Canada: Canada Has a Better Model for Cutting Government than Trump’s Shutdown Theatrics

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Australia: Breaking China’s Iron Grip on World’s Supply of Critical Minerals

Hong Kong: Trump’s Obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize Is a Farce

India: The World after the American Order

Related Articles

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Australia: Breaking China’s Iron Grip on World’s Supply of Critical Minerals

India: The World after the American Order

India: The Real Question behind the US-China Rivalry

Pakistan: The Beginning of the 2nd Cold War