On the Rise: America’s Military Soft Power

Published in Global Times
(China) on 27 May 2011
by Han Xudong (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Qu Xiao. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
America has caught people’s attention by recently taking a series of actions: First, Obama has nominated CIA Director Leon Panetta to be the next Secertary of Defense; second, U.S. special forces have killed bin Laden in a successful raid, putting the 10-year-long death pursuit to an end; third, America has published International Strategy for Cyberspace. At first glance, these things appear to be irrelavant, but in fact, they are all part of America’s plan to strive for dominance in terms of soft power.

With new technology becoming more and more a part of social life, the competition of soft power, especially military soft power, is getting ever more severe. Cyber war, psychological war and public opinion war have already become new areas for military competition. In these new fields, a new challenge lying in front of America is how to take the upper hand and seize the dominant power. For example, in cyberspace, America has been constantly attacked by hackers, resulting in frequent damage to America’s national defense. The competition of military soft power will be one of the focuses of the American government; it’ll also be Panetta’s core job after he’s assumed office. It can be speculated that Panetta will take active measures to boost America’s military soft power.

Panetta, who used to be a secret agent, has what it takes to help America promote its military soft power. The competition of soft power, especially military soft power, needs the support of intelligence. America cleverly saw this point, so it has closely combined intelligence and national defense. The present Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, was a good example. He worked in the American intelligence community for many years, and he has made great efforts to boost America’s military soft power after taking office. As the general director of the intelligence community in America, Panetta knows very well about the competition in the field of soft power in and outside America, and he’s deeply aware of what kind of resources he has at his disposal.

More and more countries are starting to work on increasing their soft power. The Bosnian War, Kosovo War, and Russia-Georgia War all show that soft power-based competition is very fierce, especially when it comes to cyber war. The United Kingdom, after publishing the first National Cyber Security Strategy in June 2009, has become the first country in the world to draw up regulations on cyber security. UK government officials said that Britain has set up two divisions for cyber security, namely the Office of Cyber Security and Cyber Security Operations Center; Britain is now capable of participating in cyber wars. Other countries are taking measures to defend their cyber security as well. South Korea has founded cyber headquarters in 2010 to centralize power and boost its capability in cyber wars; America launched the plan of setting up cyber headquarters in May 2010, and in October, the division was put into use. America’s newly founded division is a real unit to protect America’s cyber security efficiently and to carry out cyber attacks worldwide.

With America putting more and more effort into advancing its soft power, the pressure on China’s shoulder is getting heavier and heavier. We can see this clearly in three aspects. First, since America is leading the game in the international competition, more and better rules are being drawn up, and space for China’s activity is becoming smaller and smaller accordingly. Second, after publishing International Strategy for Cyberspace, America has made it clear that it’s aiming for the hegemony in the cyberspace, and this has undoubtedly put China, the biggest developing country, under the influence of rules made by America in its future development. Third, China is still not strong enough in many fundamental aspects of advancing its soft power; a big gap between America and China in terms of their ability to use soft power will continue to exist.


最近,美国在国内外采取的一系列重大举动引人关注:一是奥巴马提名美国中情局局长帕内塔接任国防部长;二是长达10年的追捕本·拉登行动终以美国特种部队将拉登击毙而告终;三是公布《网络空间国际战略》。这些事件看似毫无关系,实则是美国为争取软实力主导地位而布下的棋局。


  随着新技术不断进入社会生活,软实力,尤其是军事软实力的竞争与较量越发激烈。网络战、心理战和舆论战等已经成为军事研究和竞争新领域。在这些领域中如何占据主动地位或夺占霸权,这是美国面临的一个新问题。如在网络领域,美国不断遭受网络黑手的攻击,导致美国的国防领域频频出现损失。军事软实力的竞争将是美国政府的一个工作重点,也是帕内塔上任后的一项中心工作。帕内塔会采取积极措施推进美军的软实力提升。


  情报出身的帕内塔将有提升美军软实力的“资本”。软实力竞争,尤其是军事软实力竞争是离不开情报支撑的。美国恰恰看到这一点,将国防与情报工作结合得非常紧密。现任国防部长盖茨就曾在美国的情报界打拼多年,他担任国防部长后为美军的软实力提升做出巨大努力。作为美国的情报总管,帕内塔深知美国内外软实力领域斗争的激烈“内情”,也深知美军在提高软实力的过程中有哪些资源可以利用。


  在软实力竞争上,越来越多的国家已经开展工作。不管是波黑战争,还是科索沃战争时期,或者格鲁吉亚战争等,软实力的较量都非常激烈,网络战尤为突出。英国于2009年6月出台首份“国家网络安全战略”。这也是世界上最早对网络安全制定规则的国家。英国政府官员说,英国已组建两个网络安全部门,即网络安全办公室和网络安全行动中心,已有能力发动网络战。其他国家也都纷纷着手捍卫自己的网络安全。韩国于2010年成立网络司令部,使网络力量形成合力,提高网络战的能力。美国于2010年5月启动建立网络司令部的工作,同年10月,该司令部全面投入运行。这一机构是美国在全球范围内展开网络攻击、以便有效维护美国网络安全的一个实体单位。


  随着美国越发提升其软实力,中国受到美国的软实力压力会不断严重起来。这主要表现在:一是美国主导的国际游戏规则越来越多、越来越完善,中国的活动空间越来越受到挤压;二是美国发布《网络空间国际战略》确立夺占网络游戏规则的霸权目标,这无形中就使世界上最大的发展中国家中国在未来的信息社会中不得不在美国定下的规则中行事;三是在发展软实力基础的许多方面,中国还是很薄弱的,与美国发展软实力的基础还存在着很大差距。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Germany: We Should Take Advantage of Trump’s Vacuum*

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Topics

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Related Articles

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands