Will All the Western Countries Go Bankrupt?

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 17 June 2011
by Liu Yang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Michelle Deeter. Edited by Emily Sicard.
Recently Greece, Spain, Portugal and Ireland, otherwise known as the PIGS of Europe, lapsed into national debt crises, causing the world to recognize the powerful influence of national debt. In fact, almost every developed Western country has a large amount of national debt; the only difference is that some are more deeply in debt than others. Jacques Attali, chief advisor to former French President Francois Mitterand, described the origins of national debt in his book, State Bankruptcy, which was recently translated into Chinese. This scholar, once named one of the 100 Top Public Intellectuals in the World by Foreign Policy Magazine, believes that the West cannot keep conning others.

The Chinese people have a good habit: They try neither to lend money nor owe money. If they do lend money to others, they generally advocate “giving to those in dire need but not the poor.” However, this traditional Chinese notion does not fit with Europe and its use of government bonds. In State Bankruptcy, Attali says the original use of European government bonds was simply a method to accumulate wealth by dishonest means: “When the ruler…is unable or unwilling to increase the tributes or taxes of his subjects, he will borrow money in his own name.” This reveals that selling government bonds is the strong lending money to the weak, the rich lending money to the poor. The only goal is for the powerful to preserve their standard of living.

The difference between China and Europe is that China has a long history of being an egalitarian society where poor people and rich people have equal status under the law. The rich cannot force the poor to “voluntarily” lend their money. Europe, on the other hand, has been a society strictly governed by class, where rich people could use their power to force poor people to lend their money. A Chinese saying goes, “If you owe money to others, you have to pay.” In contrast, the kings of Europe often did not pay their debt back when they had borrowed money from the Jews, or they would find ways to repudiate the debt. The most common method was to expel the Jews from the country, which would write off all debt in one stroke.

But after dismissing debt time and again, it became difficult to borrow money the next time. Europe’s first public debts were not clear, peaceful investments; thus it was necessary to rely on wars to rob the riches of others and ensure that debt continued. When every country started to use this method to get profits from treasury bonds or government bonds, World War II became inevitable. When America became the world’s superpower following the two world wars, it continued the European tradition of investing in wars and gaining huge profits in interest from the war investment.

When the last country to profit from wars is the United States, what will Europe do? If the so-called “cultured” European countries cannot use wars to make profit, will they go completely bankrupt? According to Attali: “Ultimately, the day will come (sooner than we think) when it will be revealed that a country has no ability to maintain its most basic public services, such as schools, hospitals, the military, the police force and pension payments.”

Many people believe that the system in Western countries is more modernized than that of China, but the only reason they became modern in the first place is because there were still places in the world that the Western countries could rob. The system is similar to a pyramid scheme, in which one can accumulate a great mass of wealth in a very short time, but needs an endless number of contributors. When the contributors to the pyramid scheme reach their limit, this so-called modern scheme becomes a scam and a crime. Treasury bonds and other government bonds of Western countries use the same system. When there are no more places for Western countries to rob, the system with its generous benefits, happy life and human rights will all be over.

Today, America still enjoys its huge war profits. Since America has no new war gains and relies on profits from earlier wars, it will soon be in a similar predicament when it is unable to make ends meet. Thus America is using the same method that the European ruling class used: borrowing money from the poor. If one assumes that the American system is more advanced than the European system, it is simply because European powers used to borrow money from the poor in their own county and rely on profits from wars to repay its loans, while America borrows money from poor people all over the world, especially from the poor Chinese people.

Western culture, in essence, is a culture of expansion. Its existence rests on that fundamental requirement — constant expansion. War is the most effective method of expansion. When the expansion ends, Western culture will end. In contrast, Chinese culture is relatively isolated and self-sufficient. For this reason, when Western culture stops expanding, there will be only one option: returning to Chinese culture and entering a period where the world is relatively isolated. When both Europe and America are unable to continue to expand and face state bankruptcy, and the poor people in China give their money to the rich people in America, what will happen? If we look at Europe’s customs and practices, America will certainly reject its debt. America has the greatest war machine in the world today, which has become its main crutch for reneging on its debt, similarly to the special privileges granted by the class system of the past. People in China today have no idea of the method America will use to renounce the loans that the poor Chinese people gave them.

The author is a famous Beijing scholar.

*Translator’s Note: Attali’s book appears not to have been translated into English at the time of this publication.


刘仰:西方国家会一一破产吗

最近一段时间,希腊、西班牙、葡萄牙等“欧猪四国”陷入主权债务危机,让世界见识了主权债务的厉害。实际上,西方发达国家几乎个个都有大量主权债务,差别只是轻重不同而已。法国前总统密特朗的首席顾问雅克•阿塔利在中国刚刚出版的新书《国家的破产》中,讲述了当今国家主权债务的起源。这位曾被美国《外交政策》杂志评为“全球100位思想家”之一的学者也认为,西方快玩不下去了。


  中国人有一个好习惯:尽量不借钱、不欠债;即便借钱给别人,一般也都主张“救急不救穷”。然而,中国人的这种传统观念,对欧洲“公债”来说并不适用。雅克•阿塔利在《国家的破产》中说,欧洲“公债”的源头只是统治者的一种敛财方式,“统治者……不能或不想向其臣民增收贡品或者税赋时,他会以个人的名义来借款”。这说明,公债是强权者向无权无势者借钱,是富人向穷人借钱,目的只是为了让富人保持他的生活水准。中国和欧洲之所以不同,是因为中国很早就是平民社会,穷人和富人的法律地位是平等的,富人不能强迫穷人“自愿”借出。而欧洲长期是森严的等级社会,富人可以借助权势,逼迫穷人借出。中国人说“欠债还钱”,而欧洲国王向犹太人借的钱就经常不还,或者以各种名义赖账,最常见的方式就是将犹太人驱逐出境,所有债务一笔勾销。


  赖账多了,下次再要想借就难了。欧洲最初的“公债”并没有明确的、和平的投资对象,因此不得不靠战争来掠夺别人的财富,以保证“公债”的延续。当每个国家都以这种方式寻求“公债”或“国债”的回报时,世界大战就成为必然。美国在两次大战之后成为世界头号强国,正是这一欧洲传统的延续:美国投资战争,并从战争投资中获得巨大利益。


  最后一个获得战利品巨大红利的是美国,欧洲怎么办?没有了战争的红利,欧洲“文明”国家会不会彻底破产?用雅克•阿塔利的话说:“最终只能在某一天(比我们想象的更快)被暴露出没有能力维持最基础公共服务的正常运转,比如,学校、医院、军队、警局以及退休金的支付。”


  很多人都认为西方国家比中国制度先进,但事实上,它当初的“先进”不过是因为世界上还有地方可以抢劫。这就好比传销,一开始能很快积累财富,但它需要无穷无尽的“下线”。当传销的“下线”到达极限时,它的“先进”就成为诈骗和罪恶。西方国家的“公债”、“国债”制度也一样,当世界上不再有地方可以抢劫时,这个制度连同它的高福利、幸福生活和人权,都将一起完蛋。


  如今,美国仍在享用那笔巨大的战争红利。但没有新的战利品,仅靠旧的战利品红利,美国也会陷入入不敷出的窘况。于是,美国再次采用欧洲统治阶级的做法:向穷人借钱。如果说美国制度比欧洲先进,其先进就在于,欧洲当年主要是向本国穷人借钱,靠战争还钱;而美国则是向世界穷人借钱,尤其是向中国穷人借钱。


  西方文化本质上是一种扩张文化。它的生存基础在于必须时时刻刻扩张,战争就是它最强有力的扩张手段。当扩张到头时,西方文化就结束了。而中国文化是相对封闭、自给自足的文化。因此,当西方文化扩张到头时,只有一条路可走,就是回到中国文化,进入世界相对封闭的环境。当欧洲和美国都因为无法继续扩张而面临“国家破产”时,中国穷人借给美国富人的钱,结局会怎样?从欧洲的惯例和传统来看,它一定会赖账。美国拥有当今世界最强大的战争机器,这就好比是当年等级制度下的特权,成为它赖账的强大依靠。今天的中国人只是不知道,美国将以什么方式来赖掉欠中国穷人的钱。▲(作者是北京知名学者。)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Germany: We Should Take Advantage of Trump’s Vacuum*

Topics

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Related Articles

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands