Commentary by the editors of the Foreign Department of Gazeta Wyborcza on the report of European Council on secret CIA prisons in Poland
In the European Councils report , there is no hard evidence of the existence of secret CIA prisons in Poland. Nevertheless, the accusations in the report are so severe that the Polish government cannot let them go unanswered. And it isnt the European Council that it must answer, but the citizens of Poland. Yesterday, this is just what the European Commission recommended.
We are accused of torturing people in Poland. Denials by current heads of Security and the highest-ranking politicians will not suffice. It is obvious that the government cannot admit to anything that would expose our security forces and our alliances.
The issue should be investigated by a commission of independent factors, recognized as authorities both in Poland and especially important abroad. A good team would be, for instance, a commission consisting of three ex-Foreign Ministers, who were not in the government while the CIA prisons were supposed to be operating: W?adys?aw Bartoszewski, Dariusz Rosati and Bronis?aw Geremek.
The commission should have access to all documents and people related to the investigation, and it should be up to the commission to decide what should be made public after the investigation is completed - so as not to compromise the alliances and security of Poland.
The commission should establish to what degree, in the years 2003-2005, Poland cooperated with CIA in transporting suspected terrorists. Was international law violated, especially the conventions protecting human rights and forbidding torture? Has this cooperation put the dignity and good name of Poland into question? Have Polish functionaries abused their prerogatives or transgressed the law?
Our national interest requires that Poland should defend its image as a country rule by law. Establishing such a commission would be a good weapon in this fight.
Komentarz szefów dzia?u zagranicznego Gazety Wyborczej o raporcie Rady Europy o tajnych wi?zieniach CIA w Polsce
W raporcie Rady Europy nie ma dowodów na istnienie tajnych wi?zie? CIA w Polsce. Ale raport stawia tak ostre zarzuty, ?e rz?d RP musi na nie odpowiedzie?. Nie Radzie Europy, lecz Polakom. Do tego samego wezwa?a wczoraj Komisja Europejska.
Jeste?my oskar?ani o to, ?e w Polsce torturowani byli ludzie. Zaprzeczenia kolejnych szefów s?u?b i najwy?szych rang? polityków nie wystarcz?. Jest jasne, ?e rz?d nie mo?e potwierdzi? niczego, co narazi?oby na szwank nasze s?u?by i nasze sojusze.
Spraw? powinna zbada? komisja z?o?ona z niezale?nych od w?adzy ludzi, uznawanych za autorytety przez rozmaite ?rodowiska polityczne w Polsce i - co wa?ne - za granic?. W tej roli sprawdzi?aby si? komisja z?o?ona np. z trzech by?ych ministrów spraw zagranicznych, którzy nie pe?nili funkcji pa?stwowych w czasie, gdy mia?y dzia?a? tajne wi?zienia CIA: W?adys?awa Bartoszewskiego, Dariusza Rosatiego i Bronis?awa Geremka.
Komisja powinna otrzyma? dost?p do wszystkich dokumentów i osób obj?tych dochodzeniem. Od komisji powinno zale?e?, co ujawni? opinii publicznej po zako?czeniu ?ledztwa - tak by nie nara?a? sojuszy i bezpiecze?stwa narodowego Polski.
Komisja powinna ustali?, jak w latach 2003-05 wygl?da?a wspó?praca polskich s?u?b z CIA w transportowaniu osób podejrzanych o terroryzm. Czy naruszone zosta?o prawo mi?dzynarodowe, zw?aszcza konwencje chroni?ce prawa cz?owieka i zakazuj?ce tortur? Czy na tej wspó?pracy ucierpia?a godno?? dobre imi? Polski? Czy polscy urz?dnicy nadu?yli swych uprawnie? lub z?amali prawo?
Racja stanu wymaga, by Polska broni?a si? przed wizerunkiem kraju bezprawia. Ustalenia takiej niezale?nej komisji by?yby dobr? broni?.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.