Poland Itself Must Investigate Secret CIA Prisons

Published in ?ukasz Lipi?ski and Bartosz W?glarczyk
(Poland) on June 8, 2007
by Gazeta Wyborcza (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Halszka Czarnocka. Edited by .
Commentary by the editors of the Foreign Department of Gazeta Wyborcza on the report of European Council on secret CIA prisons in Poland



In the European Council’s report , there is no hard evidence of the existence of secret CIA prisons in Poland. Nevertheless, the accusations in the report are so severe that the Polish government cannot let them go unanswered. And it isn’t the European Council that it must answer, but the citizens of Poland. Yesterday, this is just what the European Commission recommended.



We are accused of torturing people in Poland. Denials by current heads of Security and the highest-ranking politicians will not suffice. It is obvious that the government cannot admit to anything that would expose our security forces and our alliances.



The issue should be investigated by a commission of independent factors, recognized as authorities both in Poland and – especially important – abroad. A good team would be, for instance, a commission consisting of three ex-Foreign Ministers, who were not in the government while the CIA prisons were supposed to be operating: W?adys?aw Bartoszewski, Dariusz Rosati and Bronis?aw Geremek.



The commission should have access to all documents and people related to the investigation, and it should be up to the commission to decide what should be made public after the investigation is completed - so as not to compromise the alliances and security of Poland.



The commission should establish to what degree, in the years 2003-2005, Poland cooperated with CIA in transporting suspected terrorists. Was international law violated, especially the conventions protecting human rights and forbidding torture? Has this cooperation put the dignity and good name of Poland into question? Have Polish functionaries abused their prerogatives or transgressed the law?



Our national interest requires that Poland should defend its image as a country rule by law. Establishing such a commission would be a good weapon in this fight.



Komentarz szefów dzia?u zagranicznego Gazety Wyborczej o raporcie Rady Europy o tajnych wi?zieniach CIA w Polsce



W raporcie Rady Europy nie ma dowodów na istnienie tajnych wi?zie? CIA w Polsce. Ale raport stawia tak ostre zarzuty, ?e rz?d RP musi na nie odpowiedzie?. Nie Radzie Europy, lecz Polakom. Do tego samego wezwa?a wczoraj Komisja Europejska.



Jeste?my oskar?ani o to, ?e w Polsce torturowani byli ludzie. Zaprzeczenia kolejnych szefów s?u?b i najwy?szych rang? polityków nie wystarcz?. Jest jasne, ?e rz?d nie mo?e potwierdzi? niczego, co narazi?oby na szwank nasze s?u?by i nasze sojusze.



Spraw? powinna zbada? komisja z?o?ona z niezale?nych od w?adzy ludzi, uznawanych za autorytety przez rozmaite ?rodowiska polityczne w Polsce i - co wa?ne - za granic?. W tej roli sprawdzi?aby si? komisja z?o?ona np. z trzech by?ych ministrów spraw zagranicznych, którzy nie pe?nili funkcji pa?stwowych w czasie, gdy mia?y dzia?a? tajne wi?zienia CIA: W?adys?awa Bartoszewskiego, Dariusza Rosatiego i Bronis?awa Geremka.



Komisja powinna otrzyma? dost?p do wszystkich dokumentów i osób obj?tych dochodzeniem. Od komisji powinno zale?e?, co ujawni? opinii publicznej po zako?czeniu ?ledztwa - tak by nie nara?a? sojuszy i bezpiecze?stwa narodowego Polski.



Komisja powinna ustali?, jak w latach 2003-05 wygl?da?a wspó?praca polskich s?u?b z CIA w transportowaniu osób podejrzanych o terroryzm. Czy naruszone zosta?o prawo mi?dzynarodowe, zw?aszcza konwencje chroni?ce prawa cz?owieka i zakazuj?ce tortur? Czy na tej wspó?pracy ucierpia?a godno?? dobre imi? Polski? Czy polscy urz?dnicy nadu?yli swych uprawnie? lub z?amali prawo?



Racja stanu wymaga, by Polska broni?a si? przed wizerunkiem kraju bezprawia. Ustalenia takiej niezale?nej komisji by?yby dobr? broni?.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: Donald Trump Can’t Escape the Shadow of His Old Friend Jeffrey Epstein

Egypt: The Siege of Starvation between America and Israel

Australia: Have the Epstein Files ‘Ripped MAGA Apart’? Maybe Not, but There Will Be Fallout

Israel: Israel Cannot Let Trump Set Syria Policy by Default

Topics

Saudi Arabia: 4 Points from the Meeting between Mohammed bin Salman and Trump

Spain: Trump’s Focus on the Western Hemisphere Is Astute, but His Policy Needs Adjustment

Canada: Sydney Sweeney Won’t Apologize to the Woke Mob

Australia: G20 Leaders Are ‘Saving the Furniture’ as Trump Leads a Boycott

Jordan: The Danger of Gaza’s Division

Kenya: PR Power Play: The Zohran Mamdani Masterclass

Saudi Arabia: Mohammed bin Salman and Trump…Bridges to the Future

Related Articles

Poland: Donald Trump’s Delusions about South Africa

Poland: Trump Sets up Power Directorate: Brussels No Longer Rules Europe

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Poland: Time Is Running Out for Putin. Has Trump Seen through His Tactics?

Poland: America’s Suicide: Trump’s Trade War*