Fat Cats on Hot Tin Roofs

Published in Aftenposten
(Norway) on 27 November 2008
by Harald Stanghelle (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Lars Erik Schou. Edited by .
It probably won't happen, even if the conservative newspaper The New York Post demands it on its Tuesday front page. Because this week it's Citibank. Last week it was the auto industry. New crises emerge – and new calls for government aid, while businessman Warren Buffet calls this an “economic Pearl Harbor.”

But there are surprisingly few leaders who are willing to admit even one mistake. Rather it seems like most of them feels that everything has been done by the book – and bonus programs. It just went horribly wrong.

This arrogance, which the usually careful newspaper USA Today calls it, has created outrage from politicians and average people. When the heads of the three giants--Ford, General Motors and Chrysler-- flew the short 90 minute flight from Detroit to Washington in three separate corporate jets, the outrage peaked. Their errand was to beg congress for money to survive.

This irony made congressman Gary Ackerman say “Couldn’t you all have downgraded to first class or jet-pooled to get here?” But that idea had not struck any of the three corporate heads. The idea of cutting their own wages seemed just as alien. Like down to one dollar, the symbolic and powerful gesture Chrysler-boss Lee Iacocca made famous three decades ago when he received government aid to save the company.

Ford's Alan Mullaly flatly refused. But then, he did make 154 million dollars last year.

Listening to and understanding the music of our society has never been the best ability of corporate leaders. Still, it is an almost astounding deafness that has been demonstrated by many corporate leaders this fall. Like when congress found out that Richard Fuld, head of Lehman Brothers, the bank who kicked off this financial crisis with its bankruptcy on September 15th, almost ridiculed a suggestion to hold back bonuses of the CEO's to send a strong signal to employees and investors just three months before.

“Dont worry”, Fuld said in an email, “they are only people who think about their own pockets.”

These ideas are obviously alien to Richard Fuld. He's only gotten 2.45 billion NOK in the last even years it took him to run this once proud institution into the ditch.

Citigroup's councelor Robert E. Rubin – Bill Clinton's former Secretary of the Treasury – received 749 million NOK before he left the sinking ship in August. By the way, he is the role model for the top economic advisors of Barack Obama.

The fat cats, as they are called, are wandering on hot tin roofs these says. Perhaps there can be some comfort that professor Dan Ariely recently presented research showing that people work better without promises of extra rewards. It simply distracts and creates stress.



Fete katter på hete blikktak

DET SKJER NEPPE, selv om den konservative avisen The New York Post forlanger det på førstesiden tirsdag. For denne uken er det Citibank. I forrige uke var det bilindustrien. Stadig nye kriser – og stadig nye rop om statshjelp i det finansmannen Warren Buffet har kalt «dette økonomiens Pearl Harbor».

Likevel er det oppsiktsvekkende få ledere som er villig til å erkjenne et eneste feilgrep. Snarere virker det som om de fleste mener alt har vært gjort etter læreboken – og bonusprogrammene. Det har bare gått så forferdelig galt.

Denne arrogansen – som den vanligvis forsiktige avisen USA Today kaller det på lederplass – har skapt kraftig forargelse både hos politikere og folk flest. Den toppet seg da sjefene i de tre bilgigantene Ford, General Motors og Chrysler reiste den 90 minutters korte flyturen fra bilbyen Detroit til Washington i tre forskjellige privatfly. Ærendet i hovedstaden var å trygle Kongressen om penger for å overleve.

Denne kontrastfylte ironi fikk kongressrepresentanten Gary Ackerman til å utbryte: «Kunne dere ikke i det minste nedgradert dere til førsteklasse på et rutefly? Eller slått dere sammen om et eneste privatfly?»

Men den tanken hadde ingen av de tre toppsjefene vært inne på. Like fremmed virket ideen om et kraftig kutt i egne lønninger. For eksempel til en dollar, den symbolske og virkningsfulle gest eks-Chrysler-sjef Lee Iacocca gjorde berømt da han for tre tiår siden tok imot statlig hjelp for å redde selskapet.

«Jeg tror jeg har det bra som jeg har det», lød Fords Alan Mulally blanke avvisning av hele problemstillingen. Så tjente han da også rundt 154 millioner dollar i fjor.

Samfunnsmusikalitet har sjelden vært næringslivslederes sterkeste side. Likevel er det en nesten imponerende tonedøvhet mange toppledere har demonstrert denne høsten. Som når det i Kongressen ble avslørt at Richard Fuld – sjef for Lehman Brothers, banken som med konkursen 15. september ga startsignalet til den store finanskrisen – bare tre måneder tidligere nærmest latterliggjorde et forslag om å holde tilbake toppsjefenes bonuser for å sende et sterkt signal til både ansatte og investorer om alvoret.

«Ta det med ro», skrev Fuld i et nå offentliggjort skjermbrev, «slike forslag kommer bare fra folk som tenker på sine egne lommebøker.»

Tanker som åpenbart er fjerne for Richard Fuld. Han har jo «bare» fått med seg 2,45 MILLIARDER kroner i løpet av de syv årene det tok ham å kjøre den en gang så stolte institusjonen i grøften. Citigroups spesialrådgiver Robert E. Rubin – Bill Clintons tidligere finansminister – fikk med seg 749 millioner kroner før han i august forlot det synkende bankskipet. Han er for øvrig forbildet for Barack Obamas økonomiske toppfolk.

De fete kattene, som de kalles, vandrer på hete blikktak for tiden. Kanskje kan det være en slags trøst at professor Dan Ariely i The New York Times nylig har presentert forskning som viser at folk arbeider bedre uten løfter om store ekstra belønninger. Det siste simpelthen distraherer og stresser dem for mye.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Sri Lanka: Israel-Hamas Truce: Trump’s Peace Push-Dividends or Deception?

Germany: A Sensible Plan for Gaza*

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Germany: It’s Not Only Money That’s at Stake: It’s American Democracy

Topics

Russia: Trump Essentially Begins a ‘Purge’ of Leftist Regimes in Latin America*

Mexico: Trump’s Climate Denialism vs. Reality

Turkey: Dismembering Syria, Bombing Gaza: Can Trump Finally Veto Neocons?

Sri Lanka: Israel-Hamas Truce: Trump’s Peace Push-Dividends or Deception?

Germany: Cooly Calculated: Trump Constructs Authoritarian Realities

Germany: The Main Thing Is That the War Stops

Germany: It’s Not Only Money That’s at Stake: It’s American Democracy

South Korea: Trump: ‘I’ve Never Walked into a Room So Silent Before’

Related Articles

Norway: Assange Can Be Extradited to the United States, Risks 175 Years in Prison

Norway: Ziwe Fumudoh Has Based Career on Making White Interview Subjects Uncomfortable*

Norway: Could Latin America Be the Winner of the New Cold War?

Norway: Oscar Worthy Portrayal in ‘Passing’

Norway: Facebook’s Metaverse Will Make Us Even More Vulnerable