The Curve That Became Poker Straight

Published in Sydsvenskan
(Sweden) on 12 February 2012
by Patrik Svensson (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Grace Olaison. Edited by Tom Proctor.
Inequality and social mobility are the Laurel and Hardy of economic theory; they are two entirely different things that seem to be inseparable.

The concept is not least important in the most economically unequal countries: One often motivates the other. In other words, it doesn’t really matter if resources are unevenly distributed as long as everyone has a chance of helping themselves.

This idea received a painful shot in the foot the other week when Alan Krueger, one of Obama’s economic advisers, presented a diagram that showed that economic equality and social mobility go hand in hand.

The findings have been attested from several directions in the academic world. It shows quite simply that the most egalitarian countries — in essence, the Nordic nations — are also those which have the greatest social mobility by far. The most unequal country, the U.S., has the least social mobility. And the numbers correlate in an almost uncanny way. The curve is poker straight.

What does Krueger call the diagram? “The Great Gatsby Curve.” Clearly, one must go to literature to find a name for something so enlightening.


Ojämlikhet och social rörlighet är Helan och Halvan i ekonomisk teori. Två helt olika saker som ändå inte tycks kunna gå att skilja åt.

Begreppen är inte minst viktiga i de mest ekonomiskt ojämlika länderna där det ena ofta motiveras av det andra. Det vill säga, det kanske inte spelar så stor roll om resurserna är ojämnt fördelade så länge alla har samma chans att ta för sig.

Denna idé fick sig ett smärtsamt skott i foten häromveckan när Alan Krueger (bilden), en av Barack Obamas ekonomiska rådgivare, presenterade ett diagram som visar att ekonomisk jämlikhet och social rörlighet hänger ihop som två vågskålar.

Rönen har bekräftats på flera håll i den akademiska världen. De visar i all sin enkelhet att de mest jämlika länderna – i materialet de nordiska – också är de som har överlägset störst social rörlighet. Det mest ojämlika landet, USA, har också den minsta sociala rörligheten. Och siffrorna korrelerar på ett nästan spöklikt sätt. Kurvan är rak som en spik.

Vad Krueger kallar diagrammet? ”The Great Gatsby Curve”. Klart man måste gå till litteraturen för att hitta ett namn på något så upplysande.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Topics

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Related Articles

Austria: Elon Musk Could Learn a Lesson in Sweden

Finland: The US Expects Finland and Sweden To Join NATO at the Same Time

Malaysia: NATO Goes Nordic

Venezuela: Eyes on the Atlantic Alliance

Sweden: The New US-China Strategy: A Red Flag for Beijing