Combat Effectiveness of U.S. Military in Asia Remains a Question

Published in Xinhua
(China) on 10 June 2012
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Xiaowan Zhou. Edited by Audrey Agot.
According to American media, the United States may deploy 20 to 40 littoral combat ships (LCS) to the Pacific Naval Force. If the Asia Pacific Naval Force is dominated by LCS, then their contribution to combat effectiveness of U.S. military in Asia Pacific region will be questioned. After all, LCS is a type of light weapon – it can complete missions from anti-submarine to mine clearance, but it is not effective in direct confrontation with the enemy.

Stealth Warships Seem to be Impossible

The American media reports that a naval force containing numerous cruisers and destroyers can cause heavier damages to the enemy, compared to one dominated by LCS. A recent report states that the Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer, still under construction, will be deployed in the Asia Pacific region. According to the U.S. military, the ship’s low radar profile and advanced gun system will serve as the pillar of support for the U.S. military in future Asia Pacific wars. However, due to its high cost of $7 billion, they only plan to build three.

Furthermore, among the 11 U.S. aircraft carriers, six are deployed in the Pacific Ocean. The deactivation of the USS Enterprise is scheduled for this year. USS General R. Ford is scheduled to be deployed in the Pacific Ocean after 2015 to maintain the U.S. military’s advantage in terms of the number of aircraft carriers. In other words, U.S. will maintain the number of its aircraft carriers in Asia Pacific at six.

Effect of U.S. Seventh Fleet is More Direct

No matter how much military strength the U.S. Navy deploys to Asia Pacific, the U.S. Pacific Fleet that is long stationed in the region will surely benefit. More specifically, the U.S. Seventh and Third Fleet will be the biggest beneficiaries in this adjustment plan of U.S. Naval forces. Moreover, forces of change to the U.S. Seventh Fleet –whose scope of operations is closer to the countries in the Asia Pacific region – will affect the security of that region more directly.


本报讯  据美国媒体报道,今后可能会有20至40艘濒海战斗舰加入太平洋舰队。如果在美国向亚太增加的海军力量中,濒海战斗舰构成了主力,那么,其究竟能在多大程度上增强美军在亚太地区的战斗力将备受质疑。毕竟,这种战舰只是一种轻武器战舰,它可以完成从反潜到清除水雷的各项任务,但却无法胜任与敌军作战舰只直接对抗的任务。

隐形战舰有点悬

有美国媒体称, 与一支以濒海战斗舰为主体的舰队相比,拥有大量巡洋舰和驱逐舰的舰队能给敌军以更沉重的打击。近日有报道说,正在建造中的“超级隐形驱逐舰”DDG-1000未来将部署在亚太地区,按照美军的说法,这种拥有超级隐形能力、先进电磁大炮的先进驱逐舰将成为美军未来亚太战略的重要支撑。只不过,由于单艘价格高达70亿美元,这种超级战舰美国只打算造3艘。

此外,在美国现有11艘航空母舰中,有6艘部署在太平洋,其中“企业”号航母定于今年退役;“杰拉尔德・R・福特”号2015年服役后将部署在太平洋,保持美军在这一海域的航母数量优势。也就是说,美国在亚太地区的航母仍将维持6艘的规模。

第七舰队影响更直接

不论美国海军向亚太增兵多少,增加何种兵力,常驻亚太的美国太平洋舰队无疑都将从中受益。更具体点说,太平洋舰队所辖的第七舰队和第三舰队将是此次美国海军兵力调整计划的最大受益者。而且,活动范围更为靠近亚太各国的第七舰队的兵力变化对该地区安全格局的影响显然要更为直接。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Topics

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Related Articles

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands