After Aurora, It’s Business as Usual

Published in Le Figaro
(France) on 7/22/12
by Jean-Sébastien Stehli (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Tabitha Middleton. Edited by .

Edited by Katie Marinello

During dramatic events, we sometimes discover strange things. Recently, we discovered that National Rifle Association members read The New Yorker. As soon as Adam Gopnik gave his opinions about the Aurora massacre on his blog, 207 comments defending the right to possess firearms, even assault weapons if desired, were posted.

So, nothing is going to change. Especially not the ritual that accompanies each massacre.

As with any ritual, this one is always the same: We hear speeches full of good feelings and compassion for the families, but certainly not a word on the essential issue of firearms. No one has mentioned again that the murderer was able to buy, among other things, 6,000 bullets. On the campaign in Florida, Obama asked for a moment of silence for the victims and their families and cancelled the rest of his campaign events, asking that flags fly at half-mast. But nothing was said about the right to possess not just a firearm, but an arsenal. Absolute silence. The Democrats, who blame Al Gore’s defeat in 2000 on his anti-gun position, learned their lesson. Talking about guns doesn’t pay off politically. Let the massacres continue, but protect the campaign.

Mitt Romney himself is a friend of the NRA. On Apr. 13, he spoke before the members of the lobby to defend the right of each person to possess weapons. “We need a president who will stand up for the rights of hunters, sportsmen, and those seeking to protect their homes and their families. President Obama has not; I will.”

But in 2004, while he was governor of Massachusetts, Romney passed a law forbidding assault weapons. He has trouble today justifying that law, as he does the state’s universal health care law, before his electorate. Fifty-five percent of Republican voters own a firearm, versus 40 percent of Democrats. Forty-seven percent of Americans own at least one gun. More than 300 million firearms circulate in the United States. But what’s worse, for the last 10 years, Congress has abandoned all attempts to regulate the possession of firearms. The law on the possession of assault weapons expired in 2004 with elected officials careful not to renew it, and the waiting period for owning a firearm has not budged. Forty-four states have passed a law allowing citizens to carry firearms outside of their homes.

In a recent issue of American Rifleman, the NRA’s magazine, David Keene, the NRA’s new president, explains to his 4 million members that the 2012 election will be without a doubt, “the most crucial election, from a Second Amendment standpoint, in our lifetimes.” Just that. So there is little chance that we will hear the Democratic or the Republican candidate mention the word “firearms” in their homilies. The massacres can continue.


Après Aurora, les affaires continuent

A l'occasion d'un drame, on découvre parfois de drôles de choses. Ainsi, on découvre que les membres de la NRA (National Rifle Association) sont des lecteurs du New Yorker. A peine Adam Gopnik avait-il écrit sur son blog les réflexions que lui inspirait le massacre d'Aurora, que 207 commentaires venaient défendre le droit de posséder des armes à feu, même des armes d'assaut, autant qu'on le souhaite.

Le rituel est immuable (c'est d'ailleurs le propre des rituels): on entend des discours pleins de bons sentiments et de compassion pour les familles, mais surtout pas un mot sur la question essentielle -- les armes à feu. Que le meurtrier ait pu acheter, entre autre, 6.000 balles, personne ne trouve à y redire. En campagne en Floride, Obama a demandé un instant de silence pour les victimes et leurs familles et a annulé le reste des événements de sa campagne en demandant que les drapeaux soient en berne. Mais rien sur le droit non pas de posséder une arme, mais un arsenal. Silence absolu. Les Démocrates qui imputent la défaite d'Al Gore en 2000 à sa position anti guns ont compris la leçon. Parler des armes n'est pas payant politiquement. Continuons à massacrer, mais protégeons l'élection.

Romney, lui, est un ami de la NRA. Le 13 avril, il a pris la parole devant les membres du lobby pour défendre le droit de toute personne à posséder des armes. "Nous avons besoin d'un président qui défendra les droits des chasseurs, de ceux qui veulent défendre leur maison et leur famille. Le président Obama ne l'a pas fait. Je le ferai." Mais en 2004, Romney a fait voter une loi lorsqu'il était gouverneur du Massachusetts interdisant les armes d'assaut. Il a du mal, aujourd'hui, à justifier cette loi (comme celle sur l'assurance santé) auprès de son électorat. 55% des électeurs Républicains sont détenteurs d'une arme à feu, contre 40% pour les Démocrates. 47% des Américains possèdent au moins une arme. Plus de 300 millions d'armes circulent aux Etats-Unis. Mais pire, depuis dix ans, le Congrès a abandonné toute velléité de réglementer la possession d'armes: la loi sur la possession d'armes d'assaut a expiré en 2004 et les élus se sont bien gardés de la renouveler; le délai d'attente pour entrer en possession d'une arme n'a pas bougé. 44 Etats ont passé une loi autorisant le port d'une arme à feu hors de chez soi.

Dans une récente livraison du magazine de la NRA, American Rifleman, son nouveau président, David Keene, explique à ses 4 millions de membres que l'élection de 2012 sera sans doute "l'élection la plus cruciale de notre vie pour la défense du Second Amendement." Rien que cela. Il y a donc peu de chance que l'on entende le Démocrate ou le Républicain mentionner le mot "armes" dans leurs homélies. Le massacre peut continuer.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Iran: US Strategy on Iran: From Sanctions to Perception Warfare

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

South Korea: Trump: ‘I’ve Never Walked into a Room So Silent Before’

Germany: A Sensible Plan for Gaza*

Topics

South Korea: Trump: ‘I’ve Never Walked into a Room So Silent Before’

Iran: US Strategy on Iran: From Sanctions to Perception Warfare

Germany: A Sensible Plan for Gaza*

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Related Articles

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

France: Trump Yet To Make Progress on Ukraine

France: Tariffs: The Risk of Uncontrollable Escalation

France: Donald Trump’s Laborious Diplomatic Debut

France: Trump’s Greenland Obsession

1 COMMENT

  1. As long as there are no Active Death Penalty Laws and Protections for home owners then guns are needed. The best Quote I have heard so far is “When seconds count the Police are minutes away”. In my town there is no Police Department and it can take up to 30 minutes for a response. I will do anything to stop any threat to my family. An American Citizen