The new year began on a high note in the U.S. In Europe, too, the economic situation does not seem as uncertain as one year ago. However, on both sides of the Atlantic, economic and social stability depend on the maturity and openness of politicians. In the United States, Barack Obama's reelection as president has set the market fundamentalists on the defensive. Maybe because of this, when it was least expected, the House of Representatives – dominated by Republicans hostile to Obama – approved on the very first day of the new year a budget agreement that prevented the terrifying “fiscal cliff.” Even if the suspense lasted until the end of the vote, toward midnight, the House of Representatives adopted the budget agreement in the same manner in which it was finalized, in extremis, one day prior and immediately voted into the Senate. Could this be a sign that Barack Obama's second term will be marked by a next deal?
The highly discussed "fiscal cliff" would have automatically been applied at the start of the new fiscal year, when the transition period for modifying fiscal legislation that was favorable to the great wealth from the Bush era would expire. This would have brought on higher taxes to all social categories and drastic cuts in budget spending. Finally, on the last night of the year, after prolonged negotiations, American Vice-President Joe Biden and Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell reached a compromise concerning higher taxes for homes with an annual income greater than $450,000. Taxes would go from 35 percent to 39.6 percent, an important concession from the Republicans who usually are opposed to any tax increase. Sure, the income taken into consideration for taxation went up from $250,000, the amount proposed by Obama during the election campaign in autumn of last year, to $450,000. However, the Rooseveltian principle of a higher contribution to the budget by the rich has triumphed.
In comparison, in Romania the so-called aggressive taxation proposed by the USL (Social Liberal Union) during the elections late last year does not raise taxes for higher incomes at all (currently at 16 percent), but instead proposes a decrease of taxes for lower incomes.
However, even if the agreement passed Congress and was approved by President Obama, the confrontation between Democrats and Republicans on the topic of fiscal and social policies is far from over. The Obama administration has two months to convene with Republicans over budget cuts. And here the Republicans will try to intervene against the administration's social policies. On the other hand, the conflict between the Obama administration and the House of Representatives might take on the form of a confrontation on the subject of raising the debt ceiling, which was already reached on Dec. 31. In this case, the raising of the debt ceiling is attributed to the House. When it happened in the past, in the summer of 2011, the conflict between the administration and Congress led to a downgrade of the U.S.’s rating from Standard and Poor's. Even if he clearly won the elections, over the next two years Obama will find himself in a hostile cohabitation with a Republican-dominated House of Representatives, just like in 2011 and 2012.
However, the conditions for a Rooseveltian New Deal are fulfilled. After "Obamacare" was declared constitutional by the Supreme Court last summer and validated through elections by the majority of voters, the political resources of the tea party movement, which ever since 2010 has set the ideological line of the Republican Party, are limited. It remains to be seen if again, as in his former term, Obama will be facing a Europe held prisoner by neoliberal ideology and obsessed only with austerity.
Noul an a început pentru Statele Unite cu dreptul. Si nici în Europa situatia economica nu mai pare la fel de nesigura ca în urma cu un an. Dar, pe ambele coaste ale Atlanticului stabilitatea economica si sociala depinde de maturitatea si deschiderea politicienilor. În Statele Unite realegerea lui Barack Obama ca presedinte a pus fundamentalistii pietei în defensiva. Poate si din aceasta cauza, atunci când putini se mai asteptau, Camera Reprezentantilor, dominata de republicani ostili lui Obama, a adoptat, chiar în prima zi a noului an, un acord bugetar care a facut ca înspaimântatorul "zid bugetar" (fiscal cliff) sa nu intre în vigoare. Chiar daca suspansul a ramas pâna la încheierea votului, spre miezul noptii, Camera Reprezentantilor a adoptat acordul bugetar exact în aceasi forma în care fusese încheiat, in extremis, cu o zi înainte si votat imediat în Senat. Sa fie semnul ca al doilea mandat al lui Barack Obama va sta sub semnul next deal-ului?
Asa ca atât de comentatul "zid fiscal" ar fi intrat automat în vigoare odata cu noul an fiscal, când expira perioada de tranzitie pentru modificarea legislatiei fiscale favorabile marilor averi din era Bush, si ar fi dus la cresterea impozitelor pentru toate categoriile de contribuabili si reduceri drastice ale cheltuielilor bugetare. În final, în noaptea ultimei zile a anului, dupa negocieri îndelungate vicepresedintele american Joe Biden si liderul opozitiei republicane din Senat, Mitch McConnell, au ajuns la un compromis privind cresterea impozitului pentru gospodariile cu un venit anual mai mare de 450.000 de dolari, de la 35% la 39,6%, o cedare importanta din partea republicanilor care se împotrivesc, din principiu, oricarei cresteri a impozitului. Sigur, venitul luat în calcul pentru impozitare a crescut de la 250.000 de dolari, suma avansata de Obama în timpul campaniei electorale din toamna anului trecut, la 450.000 de dolari, dar principiul rooseveltian al contributiei mai mari la buget a celor bogati a triumfat. Spre comparatie, în România asa-zisul impozit progresiv propus de USL în timpul campaniei electorale de la sfârsitul anului trecut nu creste cu nimic impozitarea veniturilor mari, care ramâne la 16%, ci propune scaderea impozitarii veniturilor mici.
Dar, chiar daca acordul a trecut de Congres si a fost promulgat de presedintele Obama, confruntarea dintre democrati si republicani pe tema politicilor fiscale si sociale este departe de a se fi încheiat. Administratia Obama are la dispozitie doua luni pentru a conveni cu republicanii asupra reduceri bugetare. Iar în acest subiect republicanii vor încerca sa intervina asupra politicilor sociale ale administratiei. Pe de alta parte, conflictul dintre administratia Obama si Camera Reprezentatilor poate lua si forma confruntarii în privinta ridicarii plafonului legal de îndatorare, care a fost deja atins pe 31 decembrie. Or, cresterea plafonului de îndatorare este atributia Camerei Reprezentantilor. Când istoria s-a mai întâmplat, în vara anului 2011, conflictul dintre Administratie si Congres a dus la retrogradarea ratingului SUA de catre Standard and Poor´s. Chiar daca a câstigat detasat alegerile, Obama se va afla si în urmatorii doi ani, ca si în 2011 si 2012, într-o relatie ostila de coabitare cu o Camera a Reprezentantilor cu majoritate republicana. Cu toate acestea, consditiile pentru un next deal (o urmatoare sau viitoare orientare) de tip rooseveltian sunt întrunite. Caci dupa ce "Obamacare" a fost declarata constitutionala de Curtea Suprema în vara anului trecut si validata în alegeri de majoritatea alegatorilor resursele politice ale miscarii Tea Party, care a imprimat începând cu 2010 linia ideologica a Partidului Republican, sunt limitate. Ramâne de vazut daca si de data aceasta, ca în precedentul sau mandat, Obama se va mai confrunta cu o Europa prizoniera a ideologiei neoliberale si obsedata doar de austeritate.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.
Time will tell whether the strategic ambitions of the French-German alliance, including those regarding the European army, will jeopardize the EU's cohesiveness, and especially how much longer they can work together within NATO.