Biden’s Visit to East Asia Tests the United States’ ‘Balancing Act’

Published in Haiwai
(China) on 4 December 2013
by Ling Shengli (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Gloria Furness. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
As the year comes to a close and winter thickens, another storm of change sweeps across the Asia-Pacific region. China's demarcation of an air defense identification zone in the East China Sea has incited a heated reaction from Japan and has successively pushed the United States, Japan and South Korea closer to a trial. At this sensitive moment in time, U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's tour of East Asia largely serves to test the United States' "balancing act."

It should be observed that the dispute between China and Japan over the East China Sea air defense identification zone is merely a tactical dispute. The United States' chief strategic interests lie in how to coordinate its Asia-Pacific allies and seek an avenue for peaceful coexistence between China and the U.S. in the Asia-Pacific, thereby ensuring its dominant status in the region. America's “balancing act” in the Asia-Pacific is no easy task. It must focus on four key factors.

The first is the strategic balance between China and the United States. This is a matter of whether the two countries can realize the goal of building a new major power relationship. A strategic balance between China and the United States does not indicate that the two countries are equally matched, but rather questions how the U.S. and China can gain mutual satisfaction through mutual understanding. Preventing conflicts and controlling crises play especially critical roles in this question. To that end, while the United States is continuously pressuring and testing China, it will also seek to mitigate issues. This goal of mitigation, however, is not only intended to avoid conflicts, but also to develop principles that promote the systematization and transparency of bilateral relations. Although Biden will consider how to harmonize the conflicts between China and Japan on this visit, realizing the Sino-U.S. strategic balance will remain one of his major objectives. Sino-U.S. relations are wide-ranging and complex; there are many issues that need confronting. In addition to strengthening cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region, China and the United States must join hands to combat many issues on a global scale. The two countries cannot lose sight of the big picture over a minor air defense identification zone incident.

The second is the balance between the U.S. and its Asia-Pacific allies. America's Asia-Pacific allies are the important backbone of its implementation of rebalancing in the Asia-Pacific. Nonetheless, the differences in strategic objectives and divergences in strategic interests between the U.S. and its allies have also led to incessant quarreling amongst themselves. Japan is using China's air defense identification zone demarcation to launch an attack, utilizing the old maxim "the crying baby gets the milk." On his visit to Japan, Biden will consider appeasement, but more importantly how to strengthen the United States’ allies, coordinate responses and thereby ensure stability in the East China Sea.

Simultaneously, the United States also intends to bring together its Asia-Pacific allies to strengthen cooperation, thus propelling the transformation of the U.S. and its allies into a fan-shaped net across the region. Among Northeast Asian countries, its cooperation with Japan and Korea is the most crucial. However, over the course of the past 60 post-war years, Korea and Japan have lacked sufficient internal power to strengthen security cooperation; the outlook is not promising. Aside from this, the United States must also coordinate with its allies on a multitude of other issues, including security and the economy. How to provide security appeasement in exchange for economic concessions presents further difficulties.

The third is the United States' internal strategic balance. The crux of the U.S. strategy to rebalance the Asia-Pacific lies in whether it can realize a balance between its own objectives, means and resources. Prior to this, Obama’s absence from the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit due to domestic issues revealed that the United States is sometimes inadequate to the task of rebalancing the Asia-Pacific. That Biden's visit is focused on China, Japan and South Korea suggests that he is by no means making up for the regret of Obama's absence. Fundamentally, America's formidable strength is its cornerstone for the rebalancing of the Asia-Pacific. If the United States blindly persists in holding China as an opponent or an enemy, it will forfeit the strategic initiative in the implementation of balance. In fact, there are too many difficulties for the United States to cope with in rebalancing the Asia-Pacific. The majority of the issues lie within the United States itself and not within China; the U.S. must do some self-reflection.

The fourth is promoting the balance between China and the United States' Asia-Pacific allies. The United States' rebalancing risks are amplified in the face of China's accelerating development and its allies' increasing anxiety. On one hand, the United States will need to rely on its allies to implement rebalancing and push them to the forefront; on the other hand, the U.S. worries that in so doing it will accidentally set off an explosion between its allies and China, plunging everyone into a difficult predicament. Therefore, the United States’ interests in promoting balance between its allies and China are enormous. America plays the role of an honest broker to strengthen the dialogue and cooperation between its allies and China, integrating both sides and hedging risks. South Korea's recent deliberations on promoting strategic dialogue between China, the U.S. and Japan can be seen as a type of test; Biden's visit to Korea may thus strengthen consensus.

Ling Shengli is a doctoral candidate at the China Foreign Affairs University Institute of International Relations and special commentator for Haiwai Online.


  凌胜利:拜登东亚行考验美国“平衡手”

年终岁末,冬意趋浓,亚太地区依旧风波诡谲,中国划定东海防空识别区引发日本激烈反应,美日韩更是接连逼近试探。值此敏感时刻,美国副总统拜登的东亚之行更是考验美国如何施展“平衡手”。

  应该看到,中日东海防空识别区之争仅是战术层面,美国的重大战略利益在于如何协调亚太盟友,谋求中美亚太和平共处之道,进而确保美国在亚太地区的主导地位。美国施展亚太“平衡手”并非易事,需要注意四重平衡。

  一是中美之间的战略平衡。这关系到中美新型大国关系的构建能否实现。中美之间的战略平衡并不意味着两者之间势均力敌,而是中美如何通过谅解取得 彼此的相对满意。其中,预防冲突与管控危机尤为关键。为此,美国在不断施压试探中国的同时也会谋求缓和,不过缓和的目的并非仅仅规避冲突,还在于制定规则 以推进两国关系制度化、透明化。此次拜登之行,虽有协调中日矛盾考虑,但实现中美战略平衡才是大头。中美关系广泛而复杂,需要面对的议题颇多,除了在亚太 地区加强合作外,中美在全球层面还存在许多问题需要携手处理,不会为了防空识别区而因小失大。

  二是美国与其亚太盟友之间的平衡。美国亚太联盟是其实施亚太再平衡的重要依托,不过美国与其盟友存在战略目标分歧与战略利益分化,这也导致美国 与盟友之间龃龉不断。日本此次借中国划定防空识别区发难,动用“会哭的孩子有奶喝”的伎俩,拜登此行访日有安抚日本的考虑,但更为重要的是如何加强联盟、 协调应对,进而确保东海局势稳定。

  与此同时,美国还有意撮合其亚太盟友加强合作,从而推动美国亚太联盟由扇形向网状转型。在此之中,东北亚联盟中的日韩合作尤为关键,不过从战后 近六十年的历程来看,日韩加强安全合作的内在动力不足,前景不容乐观。除此之外,美国还需在安全、经济等多方面与盟友协调,如何以安全安抚换取盟友经济让 步也存在困难。

  三是美国自身战略平衡。美国亚太再平衡战略的关键在于自身能否实现目标、手段与资源之间的平衡。奥巴马此前因国内问题缺席APEC峰会,表明美 国亚太再平衡时有力不从心。拜登此行聚焦中日韩,也意味着其并非出于弥补奥巴马缺席之遗憾。归根结底,美国的强大实力是其亚太再平衡的基石所在,美国一味 地将中国视为对手或敌人而实施再平衡将丧失战略主动权。其实,美国亚太再平衡捉襟见肘,问题更多在于自身而非中国,需要多做自我反省。

  四是推进美国亚太盟友与中国之间的平衡。面对日益发展的中国和日渐焦虑的盟友,美国的再平衡风险增大。一方面美国需要依靠盟友实施再平衡,更多 地将盟友推向前沿;一方面又担忧盟友与中国之间擦枪走火,使其陷入进退维谷的境地。因此,推进其亚太盟友与中国之间的平衡对于美国而言利益重大,美国扮演 诚实的掮客,加强盟友与中国之间的对话与合作既是避险,也是融合。最近韩国方面酝酿推进中美日三国战略对话可以视为一种尝试,拜登访韩可能会就此与韩国加 强协商。

  (凌胜利,外交学院国际关系研究所博士,海外网特约评论员)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation against Wikipedia

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Topics

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation against Wikipedia

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Germany: We Should Take Advantage of Trump’s Vacuum*

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Related Articles

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands