The sanctions policy is working. The U.S. and Europe have managed to insist on this course of action.
Just as Washington has continued to exert economic pressure against Russia, the European Union has managed to insist that the policy of economic sanctions played the decisive role for the Kremlin in the destabilization and break-up of Ukraine. Following the announcement of the European measures, the U.S. triggered others against Gazprom, the Russian energy giant, as well as the main banks and an industrial defense conglomerate. Coordination between Brussels and the U.S. raises trouble for the Russians in the form of retaliation.
In Europe, where supporters face a war of rhetoric and a confrontational policy to be taken over sooner or later, which will put the 28 member states in conflict with Moscow — the EU has opted to commit to measures that have proven efficient. These measures are much more responsive effective and in front of which, Vladimir Putin is much more sensitive when it comes time to weigh decisions with regard to his Western neighbor.
The final round of European sanctions brings two more important changes. The first is that it will affect the oil sector for the first time, which is a key part of the Russian economy. Therefore, Putin has received the message that the EU considers no area taboo when it comes time to apply sanctions. Moreover, there is no advantageous position prior to understanding, for example, that defeated summer did not make him about to put the subject of energy relations with Moscow on the table.
The other is that this second round of European measures applies after the member states agreed to announce the sanctions but not apply them, given the ceasefire agreement between the Ukrainian government and the pro-Russian rebels. A round of direct calls to five groups between President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy and the leaders of the United Kingdom, Germany, France and Italy — and the unanimity between them, forged mainly by German Chancellor Angela Merkel — forced the rest of the European states to accept this method.
It is not possible to overlook that Spain — which expressed discretion on the application of these sanctions — has remained outside the inner circle where decisions are made. In this case, regarding the battle with Russia, they have already demonstrated that some national production sectors have been affected.
Golpe a la economÃa rusa
La polÃtica de sanciones está funcionando. EE UU y Europa aciertan al persistir en esa lÃnea.
En Europa, frente a los partidarios de una retórica belicista y una polÃtica de confrontación —que de ser asumida tarde o temprano pondrÃa a los Veintiocho en la tesitura de un enfrentamiento total con Moscú—, la UE opta por incidir en medidas que se han mostrado eficaces y ante las cuales VladÃmir Putin es mucho más sensible a la hora de sopesar las decisiones respecto a su vecino occidental.
No es posible pasar por alto que España —que habÃa expresado sus reservas sobre la aplicación de esas sanciones— ha quedado fuera del núcleo duro donde se toman las decisiones. En este caso, sobre un asunto, el de la pugna con Rusia, donde ya se ha demostrado que resultan afectados algunos sectores productivos nacionales.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
When political legitimacy becomes contingent on recognition by a superpower, populations lose their right to self-determination and democracy becomes a selective tool.
The Washington Post Guild, the staff union, questioned Bezos' commitment, saying that if he is no longer willing to invest in its mission, the institution needs a steward who understands it.
Clearly, this year’s halftime show, which Bad Bunny headlined at Levi’s Stadium in California, was one of the most impactful in the event’s history.
When political legitimacy becomes contingent on recognition by a superpower, populations lose their right to self-determination and democracy becomes a selective tool.
The Washington Post Guild, the staff union, questioned Bezos' commitment, saying that if he is no longer willing to invest in its mission, the institution needs a steward who understands it.
Trump is threatening to cut Kyiv's U.S. security guarantees ... What is this man talking about? There are no ... commitments from Washington regarding ... security.
The rise of transactional unilateral diplomacy—most visibly associated with U.S. President Donald Trump—has exposed structural vulnerabilities in the alliance system.