Obama’s Dead End

Published in El Pais
(Colombia) on 21 November 2014
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Courtney Cadenhead. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
President Barack Obama announced yesterday that he will use his executive powers to advance reforms in the United States’ immigration policy. Just as this issue initially created high expectations, it is also likely to produce a new conflict between Democrats and Republicans that could bring about another congressional stalemate.

There is no doubt that with this reform, Obama plans to fulfill one of his failed promises — one that was unsuccessful in part because of his opposition’s actions within Congress, and in part because of the president’s inability to facilitate an agreement on such a sensitive subject. This issue involves defining the status of 11 million undocumented people, especially young people that arrived in the United States as children and that cannot be returned to their countries of origin without performing an injustice.

With these executive orders unveiled, another round of partisan problems is expected that could bring on another impasse, given that the Republicans will control both houses of Congress at the start of next year. That is the worry of many Americans who used their vote to express their weariness of Washington politics because it does not contribute to the nation’s progress.

Apparently, the goal of these presidential directives is to protect against the deportation of young and old undocumented people, who have contributed to the U.S. economy, national security and even the tax system for years. But at the same time, the rulings involve decisions to prevent the southern border of the United States from continuing to be a point of entry for undocumented immigrants.

It’s important to remember that in 2013, Obama presented an immigration reform project, which was approved by the Senate, but languished in the House of Representative due to Republican objections. Now, the Republican Party has indicated that it will fight “tooth and nail” against the unilateral measures, as John Boehner, speaker of the House of Representatives, recently assured. Mitch McConnell, the next Senate majority leader, also conveyed his skepticism and asked the president to work with the opposition “in order to find a way to improve the immigration system.”

The problem is that without consensus, even though Obama could implement the reform, it will not be effective if it is not approved in the governmental budget. The final result could be another deadlock in the country, due again to the president’s inability to reach a bipartisan agreement.

The objections suggest that the divisions which have made Congress’ job so difficult over the last few years will only continue to deepen. It is likely that Obama´s announcement will hinder the reform’s approval through the legislative route, which would have a more widespread and lasting effect than an executive action.

It is important to remember that the United States finds itself in an election campaign, and that Latinos were the principal force that guaranteed Obama’s re-election. But many of them were disappointed when he did not fulfill his promise to pass comprehensive immigration reform.

However, the cure could be worse than the disease, not just because of the partisan clash, but also because in the immediate future, any immigration reform proposal could remain blocked in Congress.


El presidente Barack Obama anunció ayer cómo usará sus poderes ejecutivos para impulsar reformas en la política migratoria de Estados Unidos. Así como el contenido generó expectativas, también significará una nueva confrontación entre demócratas y republicanos que llevará a otra parálisis del Estado.

Es inocultable que con la reforma, Obama pretende cumplir una de sus promesas fallidas, en parte por la acción de la oposición en el Congreso, en parte por su incapacidad para lograr consensos alrededor de un tema tan sensible. Se trata de definir el estatus de 11 millones de indocumentados, en especial de jóvenes que llegaron niños a Estados Unidos, y que no pueden ser devueltos a sus países de origen sin cometer una injusticia.

Conocidas las decisiones presidenciales, se espera otro round partidista que puede llevar a la parálisis, considerando que a partir del próximo año los republicanos controlarán ambas cámaras del Congreso. Allí está la preocupación de los estadounidenses que con su voto expresaron su hastío hacia la política que se hace en Washington porque no aporta al progreso de su nación.

Según parece, el objetivo de las directivas presidenciales es proteger de la deportación a jóvenes y mayores indocumentados, que por años han aportado a la economía, la seguridad e incluso al sistema impositivo de Estados Unidos. Pero, a la vez, incluye decisiones para evitar que la frontera sur siga siendo la puerta de ingreso a la migración ilegal.

Hay que recordar que en 2013 Obama presentó un proyecto de reforma migratoria, aprobado en el Senado pero que languideció en la Cámara de Representantes por las objeciones republicanas. Ahora ese Partido ha indicado que se opondrá “con uñas y dientes” a las medidas unilaterales, como aseguró John Boehner, presidente de la Cámara. Mitch McConnell, próximo líder de la mayoría en el Senado, también mostró su escepticismo y le pidió al Presidente que trabaje con la oposición “para encontrar una manera de mejorar nuestro sistema migratorio”.

El problema es que sin consenso, aunque Obama podrá implementar la reforma esta no será efectiva si no se aprueban las partidas presupuestales. El resultado final puede ser una nueva parálisis del país, por la incapacidad del Presidente de alcanzar un acuerdo bipartidista.

Las objeciones hacen prever que se ahondarán las divisiones que han dificultado la labor en el Congreso en los últimos años. Y es probable que el anuncio obstaculice más la aprobación de una reforma por vía legislativa, que tendría un efecto más duradero y amplio que una acción ejecutiva.

No hay que olvidar que Estados Unidos se encuentra en campaña electoral y que los latinos fueron la fuerza principal que garantizó la reelección de Obama. Pero muchos están decepcionados porque no cumplió la promesa de realizar una reforma migratoria integral. Tal vez de allí provenga el afán del Presidente.

Pero el remedio puede ser peor que la enfermedad, no sólo por el enfrentamiento partidista, sino porque en el futuro inmediato cualquier propuesta de reforma migratoria quedará bloqueada en el Congreso.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Germany: We Should Take Advantage of Trump’s Vacuum*

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Topics

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Related Articles

United Kingdom: The Democrats Are in Deep Trouble in the US – and Labor Is on the Way to Joining Them

Pakistan: The Heir Apparent

India: Trump vs Judiciary: Will US Power Balance Shift?

Ireland: Obama’s Silence on Gaza Makes Freedom of Dublin Award Deeply Problematic

Malaysia: Even MAGA’s Having Doubts: How Israel Is Losing the American Right