Neither Clinton nor Trump Will Fully Win or Lose

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on November 7, 2016
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Fiona McAllister. Edited by Alexandra Mullin.
America will vote in its general election this Tuesday, and it is possible that the preliminary results will be available by midday on Wednesday in Beijing. This year's election is undoubtedly the most sensational election there has been in a long time, and the closer we get to its final moments, the more unclear it all seems. Its result will probably have a profound impact and will affect many people around the world. There are only two days left of the election, and opinion polls indicate support levels between the two candidates are closer than ever before - various opinion polls show that Clinton leads by just 1 to 3 percentage points. At the moment, it still seems more likely that Clinton will win; however, there is still enough uncertainty to make her and her community of elite supporters fretful and restless.

If Clinton only beats Trump by a narrow margin, she will gain power, but the political result of her victory will largely be of less value than anticipated; Trump will go down fighting, and he will be entitled to say that he was unfairly pushed aside by the unjust American media, while criticizing the election for being “rigged.” Whether or not American society will recover after the election will largely depends on Trump’s attitude because if he has a mind to continue, he will be capable of doing that. If Trump wins, it will cause a massive political earthquake in America. He has been labeled as sinister in fierce attacks by the American elite, and his victory would overturn the traditional values of American politics and the American system and American society will, unusually, be put to the test on whether it is able to facilitate a soft landing.

Regardless of the outcome of this election, America is unlikely to cease being a superpower and it is likely able to bear any resulting crisis. However, America’s soft power has already been unavoidably weakened by this election. It has fully exposed the real problems within the American political system, as well as the issue that Americans can also clearly see these problems and yet are powerless to resolve them. Through this election, people have seen the hypocrisy of America’s top politicians in their willingness to tear down their opponents by fair means or by foul. This way of selecting a leader has become alienating; even the American Secretary of State John Kerry has expressed that this election has been “difficult for our country’s perception abroad” and has been “embarrassing.”* 80 percent of American participants in a survey said they “felt disgusted” by the behavior of the two candidates.**

Will America really be heading for reform after this election? That’s going to be quite difficult. The trend in the whole of the Western world is that their leaders are becoming weaker and weaker, while the people are becoming stronger. In the West there is seldom a leader who is elected by an overwhelming majority - the leaders lack the boldness, the decisiveness and the authority to push for reform. Trump is a loudmouth who is only capable of foolishly shouting; ultimately, he is destructive, not an initiator of strength. If he gets the chance to enter the White House, he will very quickly go from being a tiger to a pussycat, from a grape to a raisin.

Put simply, Western voters are accustomed to living comfortable lives; they select leaders who will help them live even cozier lives and they don’t select those who will elevate them and make a difference. For this reason they are forced to bear the labor pains of reformist leaders. Western society is calling out for reform, too, but everyone believes that other people should be the ones to action that change, and yet there is no reform that would be able to change their own thoughts in their own heads. Thus, this election has uncovered some scars in the American form of government, and this has shocked people, but the rate at which this shock is able to effect positive change is expected to be very low. American society will probably accept these shocks out of laziness; what is most likely is that these shocks will be dealt with passively, they will be left to run their course, a stitch will be made here and there to patch things up, and everybody will continue as normal.

America is very fortunate to have been a developed country early on, and many factors, including geographical factors, have seen it become the largest developed Western nation. But its dominance is gradually wearing out, problems are beginning to surface, and yet the culmination of its achievements together with its correlating dominant status support the continuation of a national self-confidence, which means that it can continue to ignore problems that, to some outsiders, appear very serious. But its surfacing problems continue to be seen just as clearly. Differences of opinion are allowed, and this week America will attract the majority of global attention and public opinion, but this is no longer due to it playing a “positive role” - the applause has become sparse and fragmentary, and the boos and jeers can be heard from all directions.

*Editor's note: Though accurately translated, this quote has not been verified.
**Editor's note: Though accurately translated, this has not been verified.


美国大选将在本周二投票,最早到北京时间星期三中午时分,有可能出初步结果。本届美国大选无疑是很长时间以来最轰动的一次,越到最后时刻,局面越显得不明朗了。它可能产生的深刻影响也牵动了全球的很多人。

  到大选只剩下2天的时候,希拉里与特朗普的民调支持率空前接近了,不同的民调说,希拉里的领先只剩下1-3个百分点。现在看来,希拉里的赢面仍比特朗普大,但不确定性足以让她和支持她的精英群体焦躁不安了。

  如果说希拉里最后只是以微弱优势险胜特朗普,她能获得权力,但她获胜的政治效果将大打折扣,特朗普将“虽败犹荣”,并将有资格说自己就是被美国媒体不公正的选边站冤打下去的,指责选举“被操控了”。美国社会能否实现选举之后的重新弥合将在很大程度上取决于特朗普的态度,特朗普如果想“继续闹”,他将拥有那样的能量。

一旦特朗普获胜,就会成为美国的政治大地震。因为美国精英群体打他打得太狠了,他被贴上各种邪恶的标签,他的获胜将导致美国传统政治价值的颠覆。这样的颠覆会有多严重,美国社会是否有能力促成它的软着陆,将是对美国体制弹性的罕见考验。

  无论大选的结果是什么,美国作为一个超级大国不会终结,这个国家大概有能力承受大选所带来的危机。不过美国的软实力被这场大选削弱已经不可避免,它充分暴露了美国体制在政治层面的真实问题,以及美国人明明看到这些问题却无力解决的困境。

  人们通过这次大选看到了美国顶级政客的虚伪,他们为了扳倒对手的不择手段。这种选择领导人的方式已经被搞异化了,有些像逆淘汰的恶作剧了。连美国现任国务卿克里都表示这次选举“影响美国形象”“令人尴尬”。80%的美国受访者表示两位候选人的表现让他们“感到厌恶”。

  美国会通过这次选举走向真正的改革吗?应当很难。西方世界的整体趋势是领导人越来越弱势,选民越来越强势。西方很少出以压倒性优势取胜的政治领袖了,领导人缺少大刀阔斧推动改革的权威。特朗普也是大嘴巴,只会瞎嚷嚷。他其实最终只会是个“破坏者”,并无开创一个新机制的强大实力。一旦他有机会进入白宫,他很快会从老虎变成猫,从一只果子被腌成果脯。

  从根本上讲,西方的选民舒服日子过习惯了,他们在选一个帮他们更加舒适的领导人,而不是选一个带他们有所作为、并为此逼他们承受改革阵痛的领导人。西方社会也喊改革,但都认为该被动奶酪的是别人,根本就没有改革有可能改到自己头上的思想准备。

  因此这次大选揭开了美国政治体制的一些深层伤疤,造成了冲击,但这种冲击的正能量转化率估计将很小。美国社会大概会懒于为这样的冲击接盘,最大可能还是总体上消极对待这种冲击,让它自生自灭,只做些缝缝补补,大家将就着继续过。

  美国很幸运地早发展了一步,包括地理优势在内的多种因素将它塑造成为西方最大的发达国家。它的体制优势正逐渐损耗,问题浮上水面,但它所积累的成就和与之相关的优越地位支撑了国家自信的延续,使得它可以忽略一些外人看来很严重的问题。

  然而美国逐渐发作的问题就像它仍在持续的强大一样清晰可见。仁者见仁,智者见智,可以预见,本周这个国家将吸引走全球舆论的大部分注意力,但它这次已不再是个“正面角色”,掌声变得稀稀拉拉,倒彩从四面八方响起。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Australia: Australia Boosts Corporate Law Enforcement as America Goes Soft

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Poland: Ukraine Is Still Far from Peace. What Was Actually Decided at the White House?

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Topics

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Related Articles

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade