North Korea Locks Horns With The U.S.

Published in United Daily News
(Taiwan) on 25 July 09
by Liu Shun-Da (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by John Yu. Edited by Alex Brewer.
Yesterday, the South Korean media widely reported that the U.S. and North Korea have begun a political war of words over the latter's nuclear tests and missiles. Attending the ASEAN regional forum, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton again strongly criticized North Korea. Unwilling to back down, North Korea immediately returned the favor. Will their war of words cause North Korea to do something foolish down the line, leading to war with the U.S.? It is worth consideration.

Since Hillary Clinton’s appointment this January, it can be said that her position and rhetoric toward North Korea remain unchanged, especially in light of the U.N. Security Council’s recent announcement to adopt a variety of sanctions toward North Korea. The country has not only responded unfavorably, but has exacerbated the situation, publicly announcing its refusal to accept international sanctions or resume the six-party talks. As a result, at a press conference on July 22, Clinton had harsh words for North Korea, describing its actions as immature and only done to gain international attention.

North Korea did not compromise, instead locking horns with the U.S. A North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesperson immediately responded, calling Clinton a schoolgirl and taking a step further to emphasize that that North Korea will never accept the so-called "packaged" proposal: only if North Korea completely demolishes its nuclear weapons will the U.S. be willing to resume friendly U.S.-North Korea relations, guarantee the continuation the North Korean political regime, provide economic aid, etc.

For example, at a press conference, North Korean Foreign Ministry Disarmament Bureau head Li Xing-Zhi responded that for over 50 years North Korea has received international sanctions, and thus are unfazed in the face of a new wave of sanctions. Actually, it should be said that North Korea has become thick-skinned, its belly accustomed to hunger, and so it no longer cares about international sanctions and accusations.

Although North Korea is thick-skinned, it has prepared a way to back down gracefully. According to reports, host country Thailand put great effort into inviting North Korean Foreign Ministry head Pu Yi-Chun to personally lead the North Korean team and attend the meeting, but instead North Korea sent envoy Pu Gen-Guang, who holds no position as team leader, thus decreasing the rank of its dispatched envoy. Their intention is to evade international accusations while making room for a graceful exit from the ASEAN regional forum.

North Korea is quite familiar with the vicious cycle of exchanging nuclear tests and missiles for sanctions. This time, running up against Lee Myung-Bak and Obama, it can no longer use its old ways to deal with the international community. At this juncture, North Korea really has no capital to fight a war with the U.S. Hopefully, it will give up its wild ambitions as soon as possible.


對美硬碰硬? 北韓預留下台階

【聯合報╱劉順達/韓國昌信大學客座教授(南韓馬山)】

2009.07.25 03:01 am

日昨南韓各媒體大幅報導,針對北韓核武與飛彈問題,美國與北韓間展開政治口水戰。美國國務卿希拉蕊出席東協區域論壇時再次強烈抨擊北韓。北韓也不甘示弱地立即「回敬」。雙方「你死我活」的激憤舌戰,日後會不會讓北韓一時蠢動,釀成不惜與美國一戰?值得一探。

自希拉蕊於今年一月上台以來,可以說對北韓的立場與發言未變,尤其看到近日聯合國安理會宣布對北韓採取各種制裁措施後,北韓不僅未作善意回應,反而變本加厲,公開聲明不接受國際制裁,也不會重返六方會談。在這種情勢下,希拉蕊於廿二日記者會中說出重話,形容北韓是耍花樣的稚子,想在國際中央舞台出風頭。

北韓不妥協,只有硬碰硬。北韓外交部發言人立即回應,指出希拉蕊像是小學女學生,又像是要有人扶持的老太婆。並進一步強調,北韓絕不接受所謂的「包裝式」提案(即只要北韓完全廢核,美國願意履行包括美北建交、保證北韓政權存續、提供經濟援助等)。

誠如此次參加論壇的北韓外交部軍縮局長李興植,在記者會中回答,北韓五十年來一直習慣接受國際制裁,因此面對又一波制裁,北韓不覺壓力。其實應該說,北韓臉皮厚了,肚子也餓慣了,無所謂國際制裁與指責。但北韓雖臉皮厚,卻也準備了下台階。據悉,主辦國泰國想盡辦法全力邀請北韓外交部長朴義春率團親自出席會議,但北韓派出無任所大使朴根光為團長,降低官階層次,有意躲開國際的指責,另一方面也預留了下台階的空間。

北韓深知核武、飛彈換取制裁的惡性循環,此次碰到李明博和歐巴馬,再不能使用陳舊的方法對付國際社會。此際,北韓更沒有本錢與美國一戰。希望北韓早日放棄「狼子野心」。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Topics

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Related Articles

Taiwan: Trump’s Japan Negotiation Strategy: Implications for Taiwan

China: Trump’s Tariff Policy Bullies the Weak, Fears the Strong and Applies Double Standards

Taiwan: Trump Stacks the Deck: EU-Canada Trade Talks Forced To Fold

Taiwan: 2 Terms Won’t Satisfy Trump

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice